Kucinich's Antiwar Bid

By John Nichols

This article appeared in the March 10, 2003 edition of The Nation.

February 20, 2003

Cedar Rapids, Iowa

Three days after he sued the President to force a Congressional vote on whether to attack Iraq, and one day after hundreds of thousands of antiwar demonstrators in New York cheered his call to turn the tide toward peace, Congressional Progressive Caucus chair Dennis Kucinich was addressing a more down-to-earth issue at the Cedar Rapids Public Library. "It's K-u-c-i-n-i-c-h," he told seventy Linn County Democrats gathered to hear the first speech of the Ohio Congressman's bid for the 2004 Democratic presidential nomination.

» More

Kucinich may lack the name recognition enjoyed by more centrist contenders, but in the crowded Iowa primary Kucinich found there still might be room for a candidate who says without blushing, "Yes, I am a candidate for peace. I am a candidate for economic justice. I am a candidate for social justice. I am a candidate who says we can change the outcome. We can change this country. We can change this world."

"He's the one Democrat who is--as Paul Wellstone said--from the democratic wing of the Democratic Party," said Gary Sanders, an American Federation of Teachers local president in Iowa City, who noted that Kucinich is the only candidate who voted in Congress against authorizing Bush to wage war on Iraq. "He's been the most courageous on the war. He's got the best labor record. He sounds like one of us, not a warmed-over Republican" [see Studs Terkel, "Kucinich Is the One," May 6, 2002].

As he set the tone for his late-starting, underfinanced candidacy, Kucinich campaigned as much against the message malaise of his own party as against the Republicans. "You want to shake up the Democratic Party?" he asked an Iowa City activist who backed Ralph Nader in 2000. "Send me inside the Democratic primaries as your candidate, and we will shake this party so much that we get it right."

"I find myself being excited by what you are saying, which is strange for me because I have never supported a major party candidate in my adult life," said former Iowa City Council member Karen Kubby, director of Iowa City's Emma Goldman Clinic. But she was not signing a volunteer card. She grilled Kucinich on his opposition to reproductive rights. "I have a hard time reconciling all the things you are saying about economic and social justice with the positions you have taken on abortion rights."

"I've had a tough time with abortion. It has not been an easy journey for me," Kucinich replied, before explaining that he now supports a woman's right to choose, that he would veto any attempt to limit that right, that he would not nominate judges who would seek to overturn Roe v. Wade and that he favors Medicaid funding for abortions as part of a program to provide pregnant women a full range of choices. That answer left some dissatisfied.

For Kucinich, the trek to Iowa provided a dose of political reality. In a state where the caucus system heightens the influence of antiwar and labor activists who are most likely to rally to his candidacy, he found a warm response but something short of a full embrace. "Democrats here want to hear the antiwar message. They want to hear the FDR-Democrat message, and Kucinich can probably deliver it better than anyone else," says David Loebsack, a Cornell College political science professor and one of Iowa's savviest progressive Democrats. "But it's going to take some convincing, even in Iowa, for Kucinich to get beyond the choice issue and to get Democrats thinking this guy--who a lot of them are still getting to know--could be their candidate."

Well aware that, in a sped-up competition designed to reward candidates with more money and establishment support, he will need a strong showing in the first caucus state to sustain a serious candidacy, Kucinich says he's ready to do that convincing. "Everything I know about politics tells me Iowa Democrats, like Democrats everywhere, are desperate for a real alternative to Bush," he says. "I'm determined to give it to them."

About John Nichols

John Nichols, a pioneering political blogger, has written The Beat since 1999. His posts have been circulated internationally, quoted in numerous books and mentioned in debates on the floor of Congress.

Nichols writes about politics for The Nation magazine as its Washington correspondent. He is a contributing writer for The Progressive and In These Times and the associate editor of the Capital Times, the daily newspaper in Madison, Wisconsin. His articles have appeared in the New York Times, Chicago Tribune and dozens of other newspapers.

more...
Most Read

Issues »

Most Emailed

Issues »

Popular Topics

Blogs

» State of Change

Georgia Runoff is About More Than Filibusters | A Democratic win in this tough race would signal an important shift in southern politics.
John Nichols
Posted at 2:17 PM ET

» The Notion

DC to Delhi: Only Our Missiles -- Not Yours | What is Rice going to say to India: only DC not Delhi is allowed to bomb Pakistan?
Laura Flanders

» Act Now!

World AIDS Day | How to help in the fight against the AIDS pandemic.
Peter Rothberg

» The Beat

Why Obama's Got "Complete Confidence" In Clinton | She won't bring the change his backers believed in. But Obama never really shared that belief.
John Nichols

» Editor's Cut

Robert Gates: Wrong Man for the Job | What we need after eight ruinous years is experience informed by good judgment.
Katrina vanden Heuvel

» The Dreyfuss Report

Obama's New Team at State, Defense, NSC | And some comments about why John Brennan didn't get the CIA job.
Robert Dreyfuss

» Passing Through

Forget GM's Plan -- Where's The Government's Plan? | Create a demand for green cars.
Jane Hamsher

» Capitolism

Is Personnel Policy? | How much do personnel choices reflect the Obama administration's policy direction
Christopher Hayes

» And Another Thing

Election Updates --Good News and Not | Details on some ongoing stories
Katha Pollitt