The Nation.



The Imperial Presidency

This article appeared in the September 16, 2002 edition of The Nation.

August 29, 2002

The August 26 speech by Vice President Dick Cheney at the Veterans of Foreign Wars convention in Nashville has made at least two things clear: first, that the Bush Administration is fully committed to launching a war against Iraq with the aim of removing Saddam Hussein, regardless of UN efforts to insert weapons inspectors; and second, that the Administration will brook no dissent on this matter from Congress or senior figures in the Republican Party. "At bottom," Cheney declared, those who favor caution and delay in removing Saddam are advocating a dangerous path "that could have devastating consequences for many countries, including our own."

» More

  • Noted. Subscribe

    Electoral Politics

    The I-word, back on the table; Fannie Lou Hamer and the Democrats.

  • For a New Economics

    Economic Policy

    The tepid platform Democrats will adopt in Denver isn't a new social contract, but it does go places Republicans never will. Let's hope Obama does better.

  • 1988: A Charismatic Candidate

    Nation History

    Flawed and flamboyant, the charismatic Jesse Jackson wasn't the perfect candidate, but his idealism and progressive message led The Nation to endorse his bid for the White House.

  • 1908: The First Denver Convention

    Nation History

    When Democrats nominated William Jennings Bryan as their presidential candidate, The Nation was skeptical.

  • Noted. Subscribe

    Naomi Sobel on efforts to improve conditions at the notorious Postville, Iowa kosher slaughterhouse; Nation correspondents on Obama's world tour.

  • The Nation Sues the Government Subscribe

    The Nation joins the ACLU and several other organizations and attorneys in a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the FISA act.

  • Noted. Subscribe

    Ari Melber tracks the continuing fight over FISA; Stuart Klawans remembers Thomas Disch.

The intolerance of dissent expressed by Cheney is symptomatic of the assumption of imperial warmaking powers by George W. Bush and his coterie of close advisers. Bush himself acknowledged this trend in his response to a number of senior Republican leaders--including noted conservatives like former National Security Adviser Brent Scowcroft and former Secretary of State James Baker as well as US special Mideast envoy, retired Marine Gen. Anthony Zinni--who have expressed qualms about his plans. "I am aware that some very intelligent people are expressing their opinions about Saddam Hussein and Iraq," he told reporters at his Texas ranch on August 16. "I listen very carefully to what they have to say. But America needs to know, I'll be making up my mind based upon the latest intelligence and how best to protect our own country plus our friends and allies."

There have, of course, been occasions when a sitting President has assumed warmaking powers with little regard for the views of Congress or the general public. US forces were already involved in Vietnam when Lyndon Johnson engineered the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution of 1964, and George Bush Senior acquiesced in a two-day Senate debate on US intervention in the Persian Gulf only after 550,000 US troops had been deployed on the perimeter of Kuwait. Even so, George W. Bush has surpassed his predecessors in the assumption of imperial powers--most conspicuously, perhaps, in his tendency to conflate America's war against terrorism with his own existential destiny. "I will not forget this wound to our country," he told the nation shortly after September 11. "I will not yield; I will not rest; I will not relent in waging this struggle for freedom and security for the American people." In assuming this pivotal role, moreover, Bush has made it clear that he will allow no bounds on his exercise of national power.

From this, it's a short step to other manifestations of imperial decision-making, such as the August 26 opinion by White House lawyers that Bush does not require Congressional approval for an attack on Iraq. Supposedly, the 1991 resolution secured by the elder Bush for Operation Desert Storm is sufficient. "We don't want to be in the legal position of asking Congress to authorize the use of force when the President already has that full authority," a senior White House official told the Washington Post.

The assumption of imperial powers is also reflected in the President's tendency to mislead the public: He has repeatedly declared that he has not yet decided whether to use force in removing Saddam and that he is prepared to entertain nonmilitary options, but this flies in the face of growing evidence of a substantial buildup of US forces in the areas surrounding Iraq and the reports of frantic efforts by the Defense Department to produce a winning strategy for the assault on Baghdad (doubters are encouraged to compare the January and June 2002 satellite photos of the new US military air base in Qatar posted at www.globalsecurity.org).

And then there's the President's obvious disdain for the views of our long-term allies, who argue for putting UN inspectors into Iraq before anything else. This by no means exhaustive catalogue should trouble all Americans who believe in the democratic process and the preservation of constitutional limitations on the power of the executive. American freedom and democracy cannot coexist with an imperial presidency.

Popular Topics
Most Searched

Issues »

Most Emailed

Issues »

Blogs

» The Notion

NBC Makes Mockery of McKay Legacy | Jim McKay's coverage of the crisis at the '72 Olympics set the gold standard for serious reporting. NBC's coverage in Beijing doesn't even qualify to compete.
Dave Zirin

» The Dreyfuss Report

Scheunemann, Iraq and Georgia | Where's the congressional investigation?
Robert Dreyfuss

» The Beat

Stephanie Tubbs Jones: Champion of Electoral Justice | Honor the late congresswoman by enacting the election reforms she sought.
John Nichols

» Campaign 08

One Last Clinton Scenario | It's probably Biden, but...
John Nichols

» Editor's Cut

A Fateful Crossroads for America | Faced with neocon policies that have led to a new cold war, will Obama show the courage to chart a new course?
Katrina vanden Heuvel

» ActNow!

From Fannie Lou Hamer to Barack Obama | Denver Public Library highlights how the civil rights movement changed American politics.
Peter Rothberg

» And Another Thing

Good-Bye, John Edwards | On policies and persons
Katha Pollitt

» Capitolism

Six Little Words | How Civil Rights Act could save America's labor movement
Christopher Hayes