The Past Ahead of Us
-
History
Victor Navasky:
Outside the arena, progressives are saying this is a moment of transformational politics. Is the party leadership, observing a different historical moment, listening?
-
History
Jeffrey N. Wasserstrom:
He'd feel bad that the whole Communist era was airbrushed out of the Olympic spectacle. But he'd probably like the swimming.
-
History
John Nichols:
Democrats have come a long way from the first Denver convention a century ago.
-
Non-Fiction
Andrew Rice:
Two new books explore the states of wonder and mortification evoked by baseball.
-
Books, Literature, & Ideas
Thomas J. Sugrue:
Historian Rick Perlstein explores the resentment and polarization sparked by the Nixon era's cultural and political strife.
-
Russia
Katrina vanden Heuvel:
Despite the controversies he aroused in the West and in Russia, Solzhenitsyn remains above all else a writer who bore witness to Soviet society's long-censored suffering.
-
History
Tom Hayden:
Assessing Barack Obama's mythic destiny: will he become more Athenian than Spartan?
» More
-
Electoral Politics
The I-word, back on the table; Fannie Lou Hamer and the Democrats.
-
Economic Policy
The tepid platform Democrats will adopt in Denver isn't a new social contract, but it does go places Republicans never will. Let's hope Obama does better.
-
Nation History
Flawed and flamboyant, the charismatic Jesse Jackson wasn't the perfect candidate, but his idealism led The Nation to endorse his bid for the White House.
-
Nation History
When Democrats nominated William Jennings Bryan as their presidential candidate, The Nation was skeptical.
-
Naomi Sobel on efforts to improve conditions at the notorious Postville, Iowa kosher slaughterhouse; Nation correspondents on Obama's world tour.
-
The Nation joins the ACLU and several other organizations and attorneys in a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the FISA act.
-
Ari Melber tracks the continuing fight over FISA; Stuart Klawans remembers Thomas Disch.
"History," wrote James Baldwin, "does not refer merely, or even
principally, to the past. On the contrary, the great force of history
comes from the fact that we carry it within us, are unconsciously
controlled by it in many ways, and history is literally
present
in all that we do." Citing this as a starting point, historian and
Nation editorial board member Eric Foner goes on to note, "There
is nothing unusual or sinister in the fact that each generation rewrites
history to suit its own needs, or about disagreements within the
profession and among the public at large about how history should best
be taught and studied." He assembles a set of essays primarily taken
from events in his life over the past decade--it's a personal book in
this regard--including accounts of his experience in two societies
grappling with deep historical change, Russia and South Africa. All
investigate the relationship between the historian and his or her world.
Since much of Foner's own work has centered around Reconstruction, many
of the essays broach that subject and the effects on race relations to
this day (he takes on Civil War documentarian Ken Burns and the cult of
nostalgia in this context).
Overall, much of Who Owns History? stands as an argument for
public engagement, and touches on issues such as globalization, social
reconciliation and national identity. "'American' is what philosophers
call an 'essentially contested concept,'" Foner observes, and he
cautions in his chapter on "American Freedom in a Global Age" that, in
the shadow of the Reagan revolution, "the dominant constellation of
definitions seems to consist of a series of negations--of government, of
social responsibility, of a common public culture," amid the tightening
web of economic and cultural ties termed "globalization." Foner says
that "the relationship between globalization and freedom may be the most
pressing political and social problem of the twenty-first century."