Flunking the Tests

This article appeared in the July 9, 2001 edition of The Nation.

June 21, 2001

Democrats and Republicans alike are claiming the education bill as a victory. The national testing plan--mandating annual tests in grades three through eight, plus one in high school--is a significant departure from the past. As right-wing pundit Chester Finn once observed, liberals have traditionally hated the word "testing" and conservatives have hated the word "national." But old principles gave way to current political imperatives. Democrats seized on words like "accountability" and Republicans armed themselves with "compassion."

The bill is not, however, a victory for children in public schools, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds. The Harvard Civil Rights Project has shown that poor and minority children are hurt the most by an excessive reliance on high-stakes testing--in which performance on standardized tests determines promotion to the next grade, graduation or even the survival of the school. High-stakes tests are associated with high dropout rates, an escalating problem among African-American boys. Exams alone don't motivate struggling students and can even have the opposite effect, according to a Boston College study.

What students need are tests that truly measure how well schools are teaching basic skills, accompanied by constructive responses to weak points--tutoring, after-school programs that go beyond remediation, summer school (when necessary) that does more than rehash the year's curriculum and, above all, expertly trained, decently paid teachers for all our schools, especially those serving a high concentration of poor students. The education bill emerging from Congress guarantees none of those things. Instead, failing schools receive as little as one year of technical assistance, and students get tutoring and transportation subsidies to attend another school; within five years the failing school could face total "reconstitution," meaning the staff would be fired.

Subscriber Login

4 ISSUES FREE

Subscribe Now!

The only way to read this article and the full contents of each week's issue of The Nation online is by subscribing to the magazine. Subscribe now and read this article -- and every article published since for the past five years -- right now.

There's no obligation -- try The Nation for four weeks free.

.
Most Read

Issues »

Most Emailed

Issues »

Popular Topics

Blogs

» Campaign 08

Free-basing McPalin | MoveOn feeds your head with the funniest ad of the race.
Leslie Savan

» Act Now!

We Need an Environmentalist President | Climate change is one of the key issues facing the next administration. Will we elect someone who takes it seriously?
Peter Rothberg

» The Beat

How to Fix the Debates: Better Moderators | The candidates need to be pushed and prodded. Who can do it? How about Amy Goodman? Pat Buchanan? Or Ralph Nader?
John Nichols

» The Dreyfuss Report

Iran Readies Its End-Game Iraq Strategy | Is it meddling? Or pursuit of national interests? We report, you decide.
Robert Dreyfuss

» Capitolism

A Well-Deserved Prize for An Outspoken Liberal | Paul Krugman, Nobel laureate. It has a nice ring to it.
Christopher Hayes

» Editor's Cut

Nation to New Yorkers: Vote Change Like You Mean It. | By voting on the Working Families Party ballot line, progressives can vote both for Obama and for the movement needed to push him.
Katrina vanden Heuvel

» The Notion

Is the Second Superpower of the Cold War Going Down? | The Soviets were bankrupted by an Afghan War that wouldn’t end. Now, is it our turn?
Tom Engelhardt

» And Another Thing

Are You the Very Model of a Modern Vice-President? | Sarah's not the only one with a special skill.
Katha Pollitt