Final Cut on Final Solution? (Page 2)

So here's what you can gather from The Specialist: Eichmann wipes clean a pair of eyeglasses and then tries to put them on, forgetting that he is already wearing a pair. While waiting for a translation to come through his headphones, he pulls his mouth leftward in a grimace. Answering a question, he rises and snaps to attention, then sits, rises again to answer, sits, rises again. "How did he look?" the prosecutor asks a witness, who is meant to place Eichmann at the scene of a massacre, only to receive the brusque reply, "He looks better than he ought to." A man in the audience begins to shout and is ejected. A judge expels a puff of air. Another judge, having just watched film footage of Auschwitz, covers his face with his hands. When the lead prosecutor, Gideon Hausner, is rebuked for introducing extraneous evidence, he responds by accusing judge Moshe Landau of not understanding the case. More shouts from the audience; more people ejected. Eichmann, sifting through piles of documents, stands in his glass booth and talks and talks and talks and talks, while different security guards appear and disappear behind him. What was his role at the Wannsee Conference? He merely wrote up the minutes, he says. Hausner, with more anger than forensic sarcasm requires, rounds on him and shouts, "Were you an SS lieutenant colonel or a stenographer?"

"It was German bureaucratic language," Eichmann snaps with a waspishness of his own, when asked at another point about an order he had signed. "'I' doesn't mean Eichmann. I wasn't writing private letters." As if to test this proposition, the filmmakers have his image fade away.

The Specialist is more or less a compilation of such breakdowns and missteps, their indecorum emphasized by a multitude of manipulations of image and sound. (The filmmakers have even placed the ghostly faces of spectators and witnesses--digital "reflections"--on the surface of Eichmann's glass booth.) Were I to make up an overall meaning for these pictures, I would be stepping in it myself. And so I will--because a respect for human mess is something else to be gathered from this film.

Eichmann had no respect for mess. The most efficient of men, he placed all his faith in meaning rather than facts. "Meaning," in his case, was his sworn duty as an officer; "facts," both human and mechanical, were mere instruments to be pushed around. The Specialist, in its very materials, resists this impulse to resolve away the particular. It resists the impulse as found in Eichmann himself; and it resists the impulse as expressed in the trial, which was less concerned with judging an individual than with using him for a larger purpose.

Am I establishing a moral equivalence? God forbid. There is a saving grace to be found in the trial, as Sivan and Brauman show in the remarkable sequence they choose as their climax. Late in the film, the judges, bypassing both the prosecutor and the Hebrew language, are moved to question Eichmann directly, in German. They don't try to make a point; they apparently have nothing to prove. They want to know him, the person whose "I" was supposedly irrelevant. How had he managed to go on, if he felt repugnance at his orders, as he claims? Is he testifying to some form of mental reservation? "I don't have to reveal my conscience," he complains; but when pressed, he replies, "It's possible to have a conscious split state."

For a moment, the specialist has become human, to the great interest of the men assigned to judge him. And then, being Eichmann, he blows it. "Remorse," he says, "is for little children."

The Specialist, distributed by Kino International, is on view in New York at Film Forum through April 25.

* * *

When Billy Wilder defined alcoholism for the movies in The Lost Weekend, a New York drunk was a man who attended the opera, spoke in high-flown phrases and had German Expressionist visions of bats. Now, several decades later, 28 Days gives us the contemporary definition: a woman who rocks out, blurts one-liners and has fuzzy-video visions of her mom.

Yes, manners have declined. But I'll say this for 28 Days: The drunk is Sandra Bullock, who's enjoying her first good role in years, and the director is Betty Thomas, who learned long ago at The Second City how to alternate good, vulgar gags with moments of pathos. She and Bullock know how to sell shtick (as when our heroine has to clean the toilet at the rehab center), and they know how to sell emotion (as when Bullock is tempted to reveal herself to the hunky guy in her therapy group).

The strong and varied supporting cast includes Viggo Mortensen (a star baseball pitcher when not bottomed out), Azura Skye (a teenager addicted to heroin and soap operas), the smooth-talking Dominic West (Bullock's boyfriend and enabler), Alan Tudyk (a gay German performance artist, who may have been thrown into the mix as the filmmakers' tribute to Billy Wilder) and, in a stroke of casting genius, Steve Buscemi as the rehab counselor. In a world where Buscemi is the figure of reason, who needs bats?

• « Previous
• 1
• 2

• Get The Nation at home (and online!) for 68 cents a week!
• If you like this article, consider making a donation to The Nation.
• Reprint this article. Click here for rights and information.