The Nation.

It's My Party and I'll Whine if I Want To

beltway bandits

By David Corn

This article appeared in the December 25, 1989 edition of The Nation.

March 3, 2005

This is an excerpt from a column that originally appeared in the issue of December 25, 1989.

The Frank budget has not been embraced by the Democratic leadership--and is unlikely to be so welcomed. The Democratic Party still hasn't caught on; it remains a body at war with itself. Last month Senator Charles Robb, a leader of the Democratic Leadership Council, issued a broadside against those whom he may as well have called out-of-the- closet liberals. Speaking in readily decipherable code, he decried his party for "expanding government for the benefit of special interests" instead of "expanding opportunities for ordinary Americans." By "special interests" he did not mean the robber barons of the savings and loan industry. When I asked his press secretary if Robb could explain the difference between "ordinary Americans" and "special interests," she paused and then promised to get back to me. The promise wasn't kept, but then it didn't need to be.

» More

Robb's speech was vapid. "We can become the architects of a fundamental redirection of our national priorities," he huffed. But he's an architect without a blueprint. He bemoaned Congress's preoccupation with such symbolic is-sues as arts funding and flag burning, but could do no more than urge his party to "build a new agenda on mainstream values." Change D.L.C. to D.P.L., for Democratic Party Lite: great tasting themes and no filling details. Alas, for Robb, with the changes in the East, the D.P.L. crowd has lost half its brief against those liberals who once were derisively termed McGovernite. (Remember Les Aspin's snotty remark in July when the House approved a scaled-back Pentagon budget: "We've got a Michael Dukakis budget.") The best Robb can do now is show that he is not as crass as Lee Atwater in playing the race card. While attacking "speciid interests," he neverthelessclaims his is the party to give hope to the impoverished, deal with the housing crisis, expand health and child care. But, unlike Frank and the black caucus, the architect has nothing concrete to offer.

About David Corn

David Corn is Mother Jones' Washington bureau chief. Until 2007, he was The Nation's Washington editor and is co-author, with Michael Isikoff, of Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War.

Corn's work has appeared in the Washington Post, the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, Harper's Magazine and many other publications. His books include The Lies of George W. Bush: Mastering the Politics of Deception (a New York Times bestseller), Blond Ghost: Ted Shackley and the CIA's Crusade and the novel Deep Background.

more...

Popular Topics
Most Searched

Issues »

Most Emailed

Issues »

Blogs

» Campaign 08

McCain Campaign Bans Bush Librarian (Video) | The McCain Campaign drops the hammer on a librarian who dared suggest the supposed "maverick" is like Bush.
Ari Melber

» Capitolism

Can't Keep Brian Beutler Down | Beutler talks to Feingold about FISA
Christopher Hayes

» The Beat

What Obama Should Be Saying About FISA | The Democratic candidate for president could have struck a blow for civil liberties and corporate responsibility today.
John Nichols

» The Dreyfuss Report

The Problem with Power | Samantha, that is. Her Zimbabwe solution is a dangerous step on a slippery slope.
Robert Dreyfuss

» Editor's Cut

Iraq Reconstruction Corruption, Part 7 | The Commission on Wartime Contracting should be a critical curb to the systemic waste, fraud and abuse associated with the wartime-support and reconstruction in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel

» The Notion

The Afghan Pipeline You Don't Know About | It was in the planning stages in 2001; now the U.S.-backed Afghan pipeline has returned, but nobody in the mainstream media is writing about it.
Tom Engelhardt

» ActNow!

Of House and Home | Urge Congress to fight back against the subprime swindle.
Peter Rothberg

» Passing Through

Leveraging the Power of Celebrities | With the help of Web 2.0 tools, celebrities can contribute more than just hype to this election cycle.
Michael Connery

» And Another Thing

Preachers and Politics | Secularism looks better and better.
Katha Pollitt