Learning Pack Preview:
The Roots of the Vietnam War
Purchase
Introduction
|
|
The ink on the agreement that ended World War II barely
had time to dry before another war began, this time in a remote
corner of the Earth that most Americans barely knew
anything about -- the peninsula in Southeast Asia called Indo-
China. But by the time the fighting ended thirty years later, there
was hardly an American without a very strong opinion one way
or another on the Vietnam War, which cost nearly 50,000 American
lives and created deep divides in this country that have yet
to heal. In fact, the debate over American involvement in Iraq is
nearly a mirror image of the arguments over Vietnam that raged
in the 1960s. Those who opposed the Vietnam War did so on the
grounds that it was a fight that America couldn't win. Besides,
the US had no business meddling in the affairs of a sovereign
nation on the other side of the globe, they said. Sound familiar?
Even a cursory look at Vietnam's history would seem to indicate
that the US's attempt to impose its will on the Vietnamese
was doomed from the start. Here were a people whose battle for
independence began more than 2,000 years ago when the Chinese
first invaded the peninsula. By World War II, with both the
French and the Japanese occupying Indo-China, the nationalist
fervor exploded into war when the Viet Minh formed to fight for
independence under the leadership of Ho Chi Minh, the son of a
government official, who for a brief period had worked as a cook
in America. Few gave Ho's underfed army a chance against one
of the so-called Great Powers. But over the next eight years, Ho
consistently out-fought and out-manuevered his supposedly superior
rivals. Ironically, because the Viet Minh fought against the
Japanese during World War II, for a time they received aid from
the American Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the forerunner
of the CIA. That also mirrored later developments in Afghanistan
where in the 1980s the CIA actively supported its future enemy,
the Taliban, when the Islamist group was fighting Russia.
The war between France and the Viet Minh lasted eight
years until a truce was declared shortly after the French forces
suffered an ignominious defeat at Dienbienphu. By then, American
involvement in the war on the side of the French was an open
secret, even though American soldiers were already fighting and
dying in the frozen mountains of Korea. After the Eisenhower
Administration linked the two nations, calling them both victims
of Communist aggression, it was clear that soon, Americans
would be fighting and dying in the tropical heat of Vietnam.
How did it get to that point? How did America become involved
in a war that it was destined to lose? Let's turn back the pages
of The Nation to 1947, when the roots of America's first military
defeat took root in the soil of Vietnam.
|
|
|

Behind the Viet-Nam Revolt
Michael Clark | The author sets the historical background for the current conflict between
France and the Viet Minh rebels led by Ho Chi Minh (May 17, 1947).
Viet Nam Celebration
A letter celebrates the Viet Minh insurgency and says that contrary to French propaganda,
the group is not Communist-dominated (September 20, 1947).
Last Act in Indo-China
Andrew Roth | According to this eyewitness account, France is losing both the political
and military battles being fought against Ho Chi Minh, who, the author says, is not
under Moscow's control. Ho is more of a nationalist, he says (January 8, 1949).
Note on Viet Nam
An editorial says the French, who are comitting atrocities against the Viet Namese, are
waiting for the United States to step into the fight (July 16, 1949).
Indo-China Next
J. Alvarez Del Vayo | The author says the United States's course of action in Indo-China
will be dependent in part on its relationship with China (January 14, 1950).
Puppets and Patriots
American recognition of the puppet ruler Bao Dai is all about cold war politics (March
4, 1950).
Why Ho Chi Minh Can Win
Peggy Durdin | The French continue to lose on the battlefield despite the support of the
US (November 11, 1950).
The Mess in Indo-China
Helen Mears | In a change of policy, the US links Vietnam and Korea, saying both are
battles against Communist aggression. This is a mistake, says the author, who writes that
the Viet Nam conflict is about nationalism (April 25, 1953).
Korea and Indo-China
An editorial says the help the Viet Minh have received from China in their anti-colonial
battle has allowed the US to falsely label their fight as being about Communist aggression
(May 9, 1953).
|