Learning Pack Preview:
The Sacco and Vanzetti Case
Purchase
Introduction
|
|
On April 15, 1921, two employees of the Slater and Morrill
shoe company in South Braintree, Massachusetts,
left their office, carrying some $16,000 of the company's
payroll to its factory. Two armed bandits approached.
Shots rang out, and in seconds the payrollmaster and guard lay
dead. The bandits grabbed the money and made their getaway
in a Buick touring car with three other men inside.
Those were just about the only facts that anyone ever
agreed on about the small-town robbery that would soon reverberate
around the world and is still being felt today. The reason
for the uproar was the arrest, conviction and execution of
Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti, "the good shoemaker
and the poor fish peddler" for the crime they said they did not
commit after a trial they--and millions of their supporters--claimed
was not fair.
The trial of Sacco and Vanzetti was conducted in the overheated
atmosphere of the Red Scare, when, under the direction
of US Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer, radicals around the
country were beaten by mobs, arrested and deported. For most
of them, their "crimes" were nothing more than organizing
labor unions, opposing war or just being foreigners.
If this sounds familiar, it's because here in the twenty-first century
foreigners -- mostly of Arab descent -- have been
languishing in jails around the country since 9/11, held on the
flimsiest of excuses and having committed no crimes and not
being charged with any, either.
If most of them end up being deported, they will have been
lucky compared to Sacco and Vanzetti, who were imprisoned
for some seven years before their execution on August 22,
1927. Their treatment cast the US in a harsh new light. The
Statue of Liberty, once a beacon of hope, was now the Statue of
Irony, a symbol of justice gone wrong and freedom denied.
Their execution set off worldwide protests. The Nation and
other publications predicted that it would set back American
relations with the rest of the world for years to come. They
weren't wrong. Alas, that's another lesson yet to be learned, as
many members of the world community object to heavyhanded
American tactics not only in Iraq but also in regard to
the environment and the enforcement of repressive free-trade
policies.
On the last day of his life, Vanzetti wrote in a letter to
Sacco's son, "What I wish more than all in this last hour of
agony is that our case and our fate may be understood in their
real being and serve as a tremendous lesson to the forces of
freedom -- so that our suffering and death will not have been
in vain."
|
|
|

The Sacco and Vanzetti Cases
Elizabeth Glendower Evans | The Nation's first article on the case discusses the impending trial and the charges against the two men (June 15, 1921).
Editorial
The Nation reports that Sacco and Vanzetti were convicted of first-degree murder
(August 3, 1921).
Letter to the Editor
A reader says The Nationwas wrong when it called Judge Webster Thayer's charge to the
jury "fair" and writes that Sacco and Vanzetti were on trial for their political beliefs
(August 31, 1921).
Sacco-Vanzetti: A Reasonable Doubt
Arthur Warner | After examining the evidence and, perhaps more important, the personalities of the two defendants, the author suggests that the two were framed (September
28, 1921).
Anatole France to the People of America
Anatole France | A call for justice in the United States from the French perspective
(November 23, 1921).
Editorial
A important prosecution witness now says her testimony was coerced (September 27,
1922).
Chileans Condemn "Yankee Justice"
Chilean members of the Industrial Workers of the World express their outrage at the verdict, which, they say, stemmed from the pro-labor sympathies of the defendants (July 4,
1923).
Editorial
The Nation notes that a prosecution ballistics expert now says that the "mortal bullet"
taken from one of the victims was not fired from Sacco's gun (February 20, 1924).
Editorial
The Nation reports that a new affidavit filed for the defense places the responsibility for
the South Braintree murders on a gang from Rhode Island (June 30, 1926).
Editorial
A motion for a new trial is to be heard on behalf of the defendants (September 22, 1926).
|