State of Change

Fox Focus Groups in Your Face

posted by Ari Melber on 05/19/2008 @ 10:57pm

Frank Luntz's polling keeps getting weirder.

On Fox News this weekend, Bill Bradley addressed a focus group of undecided voters while Luntz collected their live reactions on his "Instant Response" dials. 2008-05-20-Picture7.png And the results were instantaneously graphed across Bradley's head as he spoke.

The absurd presentation was demeaning for Bradley, the thoughtful former senator, presidential candidate, author, Rhodes Scholar and hall-of-famer, and it captures all the vapidity of tactical spectator politics. Luntz hypes the spikes in audience feedback and questions Bradley without any pretense of interest in the issues -- it's all performance. The voters are asked to explain their reactions to Bradley's comments, but really they're scoring the show. It reminded me of a point Matt Bai made about the rise of "meta-voting" back in the 2004 presidential race:

Decades of trying to dissect and interpret the desires of the American voter -- for the purpose, ultimately, of undermining opponents and manipulating public opinion -- have changed the character of the voter himself. The popularizing of political strategy, on TV and in newspapers, has created a class of voter who sees politics more as a tactical pursuit than as a means to an end.

See if the video gets your dial going:

Comments (3)

  1. Anything to keep the US voting public isolated from one another... and looking to the MSM for 'guidance' and directives.

    The 'technological boost' is largely a sham... it's far to easily 'tampered with' behind the scenes... and it's just another way to distract the American public from listening to one another, and telling the MSM to...

    "pay attention to individual citizens, or get out of the way..."

    In the video... the commentator drew at least three conclusions that were 'providential' for the corporate agenda... yet... they were speculations disguised as technologically attained facts.

    Hocus-pocus... gimme your focus

    We know what you'll think

    Spectators pay... the cabal's cabaret

    While attention is stood on the brink

    Posted by ttr at 05/20/2008 @ 11:34am

  2. This was the logical next step for a debate forum which has perfected the technique of interrupting a person in mid-sentence to prevent him or her from completing a coherent thought.

    Probably the next step will be to consult a focus group's opinion of a featured guest BEFORE he or she even begins to speak on the air.

    The Fox News Corp. is our country's leading producer of opinion-based information, working hard to make information-based opinions a thing of the past.

    Posted by JakobFabian at 05/20/2008 @ 3:32pm

  3. ignorant short-term pandering is immoral and stupid!!!

    Posted by jrs112

    but

    that's

    the

    way

    it's

    done.

    Posted by frosty zoom at 05/20/2008 @ 10:08pm

Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Beat

House Passes Health Reform, But Without Reproductive Rights | Pelosi secures necessary votes, but only after allowing anti-choice Dems to bar access to abortion in new programs.
John Nichols
116 Comments
Posted at 9:11 ET

» Editor's Cut

Around The Nation | Obama, one year on. Plus: Jeremy Scahill takes your questions, and a new video series from The Nation.
Katrina vanden Heuvel

» The Notion

Injustice in Illinois | Prosecutors in Illinois should be more concerned with an innocent man behind bars than journalism students' grades.
Ari Berman
28 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

Obama Fails in Middle East | Clinton delivers the ultimate diss to Abbas.
Robert Dreyfuss
134 Comments

» Act Now!

Equality Across America | This week, young LBGT activists are staging a National Week of Initiative.
Peter Rothberg
16 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Thursday | Dying laptops, recapping the election, the Dow, and the Yankees with the World Series.
Eric Alterman