
Senator John McCain, R-Arizona, right, asks a question of former Nebraska Senator Chuck Hagel, center, President Barack Obama’s choice for defense secretary, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, January 31, 2013, during the Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on his nomination. Senator James Inhofe, R-Oklahoma, the ranking member of the committee, listens at left. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
Deprived of the third member of the Senate’s neoconservative Holy Trinity, Joe Lieberman, Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham are doing their best to act like wrecking balls aimed at President Obama’s incoming national security team. Their obsessive, monomaniacal focus on the attack on the US office in Benghazi, Libya, last September is the ostensible reason, but in fact it has a lot more to do with knocking down people like Chuck Hagel and John Brennan who might go along with a tilt against Israel, a sharp cut in the Defense Department budget and a rapid drawdown in Afghanistan.
Let’s give the White House and President Obama, personally, credit for blocking the hawks in his administration from going to war in Syria.
Last week, we learned that Hillary Clinton and David Petraeus, now thankfully pursuing other opportunities and spending more time with their families, had cooked up a plan to arm and train the ragtag Syrian rebels, thus getting the United States directly involved in that horrible civil war.
Now we learn that Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs—both of whom are about to join Clinton and Petraeus in the private sector—also backed the Clinton-Petraeus plan,
5:55 pm: Weirdly, Senator Collins wonders whether Brennan will be Obama's representative to the CIA, or the CIA's representative to Obama. In other words, which side is he on? The CIA's side, or the president's? The answer, of course, is that the CIA director is the president's man. That said, Brennan says that he'd always bring the truth to the White House, not tell the White House what it wants to hear. (Unike George W. Bush's CIA directors, who shaped intelligence according to the desires of the White House. Thus, Iraq.)
Closing the hearing, but with a classified session scheduled for next week, Feinstein says that she'll want answers on Mali, Algeria, Libya and North Africa. Collins says she'll ask about Syria and Iran. In other words, everything that the senators didn't trouble themselves to ask today.
5:45 pm: Senator Wyden (D.-Ore.) asks whether the president should offer an American an opportunity to surrender before blowing that person to pieces. (It seems like a weird idea, but I guess he's trying to make the point that the president ought to do everything he can before ordering the extra-judicial kiling of an American.) Brennan says, well, an American who joins Al Qaeda knows that we are at war with the organization, so he's putting himself at risk. Wyden insists that we've got to see all of the legal opinions. "What it really goes to, Mr. Brennan, is the system of checks and balances." And Congressional oversight. Brennan says: "Any member of Al Qaeda ... needs to know that they have the ability to surrender before we destroy that organization. And we will destroy that organization." (And Obama and Brennan get to decide, I guess, who's a member and who isn't. And then: Boom!)

John Brennan. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster.)
Several people have questions for John Brennan, President Obama’s chief counterterrorism adviser and his nominee for CIA director, whose confirmation hearing is tomorrow. Unfortunately, none of them are senators who’ll be asking questions.

Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta gave the approval for active duty soldiers to conduct law enforcement. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh.)
The Pentagon yesterday opened the door a little further to direct military involvement in US domestic affairs.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton visits Burma in 2011. (Reuters/Saul Loeb/Pool.)
Let us happily bid a not-so-fond farewell—is good riddance too strong a term?—to Hillary Clinton, who for the past four years has represented the hawkish end of the Obama administration.

Chuck Hagel testifies before the Senate Armed Services Committee on January 31. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite.)
Chuck Hagel may still be confirmed by the Senate as secretary of defense, because Democrats who hold the majority will probably vote with the president. But if the Israel Lobby manages to cull a few Democrats to join what appears to be a growing Republican tidal wave against Hagel, he’ll be shot down. Just as Chas Freeman—whose views are in roughly the same ballpark as Hagel’s—was shot down, even before his appointment got off the ground three years ago.

Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. (Reuters/Abir Sultan.)
Make no mistake about Israel’s attack on Syria yesterday: Prime Minister Netanyahu of Israel is trying to force regime change in Damascus by military means.

An Afghan national army soldier displays his ammunition during a special operation in 2009. (Reuters/Jorge Silva.)
As the United States moves closer to the withdrawal of its troops from Afghanistan by next year, it’s been widely reported that neither the Afghan police nor the army, nor the local security forces in the provinces, are anywhere close to being ready to take over. But a new report from the Center for Civilians in Conflict, based on hundreds of interviews conducted across Afghanistan, says that the Afghan forces are also failing to protect Afghan civilians from harm. “The capacity of the Afghan government and security forces to prevent and respond appropriately to civilian casualties is woefully underdeveloped,” says the report.

Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov, left, in 2011. (Courtesy of Wikimedia.)
You have to admire Sergei Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister, for his bluntness. In addressing the fact that the United States and Iran haven’t yet agreed to fix a date for talks on Tehran's nuclear program, he said that both sides ought to “stop behaving like little children.” In a press conference, Lavrov said:


