More and more comedians are coming out of the woodwork to defend their colleague Daniel Tosh for his defense of rape jokes. For those of you who missed the controversy , a woman who saw Tosh at the Laugh Factory reported that the comedian made “some very generalizing, declarative statements about rape jokes always being funny, how can a rape joke not be funny, rape is hilarious, etc.” The woman yelled out, “Actually, rape jokes are never funny!” So, Tosh responded by saying, “Wouldn’t it be funny if that girl got raped by like, five guys right now? Like right now? What if a bunch of guys just raped her…?”
As the story circulated, Tosh issued a non-apology, which the media has pretended is an apology, and many comedians have tweeted shrilly in his defense. Jim Norton tweeted, “People should be vocally supporting @DanielTosh.” And he stumped Tosh critics with this thought-provoking question: “Why is ok for an actor to play a rapist, but not for a comic to joke about it?” My brain hurts just thinking about it. As you read this, I’m scratching my head. The always-philosophical Dane Cook waxed poetic on the matter, tweeting, “If you journey through this life easily offended by other people’s words I think it’s best for everyone if you just kill yourself.” Totally… and, FYI, life is a journey, not a destination. Patton Oswolt wrote, “Wow, Daniel Tosh had to apologize to a self-aggrandizing, idiotic blogger. Hope I never have to do that [again].” And Louis C.K. tweeted, “@danieltosh your show makes me laugh every time I watch it. And you have pretty eyes.” The Huffington Post has a slide show of comedians defending Tosh, if you want to read more.
But what about comedians who are critical of rape jokes and rape culture in general? The good news is that they are taking to Twitter too. And here are some of the things they have to say. You’ll notice that the humorous ones are funnier and the serious ones are smarter than the tweets in defense of Tosh.
Saying someone is a hero and a lifesaver, lauding their invaluable and extraordinary contributions to the world, can often be hyperbole. But in the case of Dr. Stephen Levin (Oct. 16, 1941- February 8, 2012) who fought for his patients' lives as a physician and activist, and fought for change on both a cellular and a political level, it's simply a statement of fact.
I first met Steve Levin at the New York City office of Kinderland, a progressive summer camp focused on social justice. I grew up going to Kinderland, and was there for my interview to be a Counselor in Training (CIT). Steve was there, waiting for his own daughter—who had never been to Kinderland—to finish her own CIT interview. In a way, Steve's bringing his daughter Kate to that interview and that camp is a metaphor for what he did for so many people in his life; introducing them to interesting and important ideas, places and values. Steve brought his daughter to what turned out to be a healthy and happy place for her, just as he brought so many people, friends and patients to happier and healthier states. We started talking, and I liked him immediately; he was warm, engaged and engaging. He had a soothing, animated, deep voice and bright, sad brown eyes. He was excited and nervous about his daughter’s first time in camp and when she came out of the interview, his face lit up—Kate has this effect on him—and he enthusiastically introduced us, eager for his newbie daughter to meet an experienced Kinderlander. When they left I hoped and suspected that I'd see them again. And I did; Kate and I became CITs that summer and, more importantly, good friends. I was 15 when I met Steve. And that was 15 years ago. I've known Steve for half of my life.
Steve Levin was the Medical Director of the Mount Sinai Irving J. Selikoff Center for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, a Professor of Occupational Medicine at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and the Co-Director of the World Trade Center Worker and Volunteer Medical Screening Program. What is occupational medicine, you may be asking. In a speech he delivered accepting an award for for his contributions to the field, Steve described occupational medicine as,
1. The biggest shock of the night is that it’s a Saturday night and MSNBC isn’t screening Lockdown.
2. #DontBother is trending on Twitter. I’m pretty sure that was Twitter talking to Mitt Romney.
3. The Romney rally does the wave, demonstrating just how in touch the Romney campaign is with the American people… circa 1997. The empty Mitt Romney podium visible as we wait for the Governor to arrive serves as the perfect Mittaphor: it’s there, and it says Mitt Romney, but there’s nothing actually behind it.
Last night’s 179th GOP debate of the season taught us so much, again, about the GOP candidates: socialism for the military, no government at all for anyone else, protect zygotes, execute humans, “I swear I never once provided a single person with healthcare”/ “Yes you did!”/ “Did not!”/ “Did too!,” etc. But the biggest revelations of last night did not occur at the debates.
Thursday, I blogged about Marianne Gingrich, one of Newt’s several exes, and her tell-a-little interview (and how inconceivable sex with Newt Gingrich was to me). That was based on a mere preview of Marianne’s interview that ABC had released. But after the debate, ABC ran the entire at-least-a-couple-of-minutes-long interview. Here’s what stood out:
• Gingrich left his first wife after she got cancer and left Marianne after she got MS. The take-away is that at least Newt is consistent and that Callista better take her multi-vitamins, though she does have her age on her side.
Rick Perry may have quit the race—at a Wendy’s, appropriately—but his words will always be with us. Here are some of the gems he said during the campaign. We’ll always have the memories! And the video! Perry has endorsed Gingrich, in his latest gaffe, and Newt has officially asked Perry to head a Tenth Amendment enforcement project for him. I would have gone with the Second:
Personally, I would hate to be married to Newt Gingrich. If I were, I imagine I’d consider seeking refuge from the smug, odious, racist, classist, Garbage Pail Kid/Michelin Man hybrid in the arms of another. I wouldn’t be nervous about Gingrich cheating on me not because of his character, but because I would find it inconceivable that any other woman would find him attractive. One is just a fluke. But, shockingly enough, it was Newt who wanted to have an open marriage. Well, that’s not fair, he wanted to have a mistress and cheat on his wife, but when he finally admitted to cheating on his wife, he asked for an open marriage to accommodate what was then a six-year-long affair.
On Monday, Republicans showed their esteem for Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. by holding a debate on on the holiday honoring him in the last state to recognize it. To South Carolina’s credit, it only took it seventeen years to catch up with the times, adopt the holiday and remove that good old Confederate Flag from its state house. And, in perfect harmony, all the candidates standing on the South Carolina stage last night advocate and have tried to implement policies which Dr. King fought against, or would have fought against.
The only question is how overt and how extensive they are in their rejection of King’s ideas. Some candidates are more Carolinian, by which I mean more in touch with their racist sides, such as Ron Paul who, while praising Martin Luther King as his hero, voted against Martin Luther King, Jr. Day and would have voted against the Civil Rights Act. (If this is how Paul treats his heroes, I shudder at the thought of how he would treat his enemies.) On the other end of the spectrum stands Mitt Romney, who isn’t particularly racist, though his religions—free market capitalism, limited government and Mormonism—don’t have the best track record when it comes to people of color (especially black people, in the Mormon case).
But as anyone who has ever looked beyond the G-rated version of Martin Luther King Jr. knows, race, class and foreign policy were inextricably linked for King. And Romney’s embrace of unbridled capitalism and hawkish foreign policy land him at ideological odds with the civil rights leader. What’s remarkable, though, is imagining the language that Romney would use about King if he had lived to today and had his message not been sanitized and distorted. Given that Romney accuses Obama of launching class warfare, being a socialist with “European ideas” (read foreigner), what would he have said about King, who, unlike Obama, openly embraced socialist democracy, critiqued US foreign policy and called America the “greatest purveyor of violence in the world”? Thanks to video footage of Martin Luther King and Mitt Romney, we have an idea.


