Quantcast

Jessica Valenti | The Nation

  •  
Jessica Valenti

Jessica Valenti

Feminism, sexuality & social justice. With a sense of humor.

The Future of Feminist Activism: Live Chat With Jessica Valenti, Anna Holmes and Aimee Thorne-Thomsen—2 PM

As the GOP’s “War on Women” has intensified and states have passed ever more onerous restrictions on abortion access, feminist activists have shown again and again that they have the energy and organizing prowess to forcefully take on any adversary—from the once-popular Susan G. Komen Foundation to Rush Limbaugh to legions of anti-choice lawmakers.

Meanwhile, when the reaction to Anne-Marie Slaughter's recent article inThe Atlantic proved that the question "can women have it all?" still hits a nerve, the varying responses from feminist writers made one thing clear: in order to solve the problems facing working women, we need more feminism, not less.

As with any dynamic movement, the future outlets for this energy are all but certain. What direction (or directions) is feminist activism heading? What organizing will we see in years to come?

The Daddy Wars

There’s been a flurry of online conversation around domestic issues lately—be it the politics of staying-at-home or how we’re still trying to “have it all” to no avail. Things have gotten heated.

There’s much missing in the framing of these debates—from the expectation of power and privilege to a limited idea of what success is. What’s irked me is the continued assumption that this is a women’s issue. The problem isn’t that women are trying to do too much, it’s that men aren’t doing nearly enough.

A new report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that women—even those with full-time jobs—still do the bulk of housework and childcare. On an average day, 48 percent of women and 19 percent of men did housework. Married women with children who work full time spend 51 minutes a day on housework while married men with children spend just 14 minutes a day.

Vagina, Vagina, Vagina

Yesterday, Michigan Representative Lisa Brown was banned from speaking after having the audacity to use the word “vagina” in a debate over an anti-abortion bill. Apparently, it’s not enough that Republicans have made it a political priority to roll back women’s reproductive rights—they also want to ensure that we remain silent as they do it.

Representative Mike Callton, for example, was absolutely scandalized by Brown’s comments: “What she said was offensive.… It was so offensive, I don’t even want to say it in front of women. I would not say that in mixed company.” (He does realize that this mixed company likely has vaginas, yes?)

I wished this latest GOP gaffe surprised me, but Republicans feeling squirmy about women’s “down-theres” while desperately trying to keep said “hoo-hoos” in check is pretty standard these days. We live in a country where it’s fine to legislate vaginas, but saying the actual word is forbidden.

Targeting 'Slutty' Students


(AP Photo/Paul Beaty)

This week students at New York’s Stuyvesant High School (my alma mater) protested a discriminatory dress code by participating in “Slutty Wednesday”—a day in which students deliberately violated the code that bars them, among other restrictions, from wearing anything that bares their shoulders. (The horror!)

What Would George Tiller Do?

Today is the third anniversary of Dr. George Tiller’s assassination. On May 31, 2009, Tiller was shot and killed by Scott Roeder while he served as an usher in his Wichita church. Tiller was one of the only abortion providers in the country to provide late-term abortions. He often wore a button that said “Trust Women.”

I wonder, if Dr. Tiller were alive today, what he would think about the unwavering attack against women’s reproductive freedom and bodily integrity—if he could ever of imagined that American women would still not just be fighting for the right to abortion but for birth control. Or that there would be a national debate on whether or not it’s appropriate to call a woman who wants contraception coverage a “prostitute.” I imagine that even for a man who had seen a lot of misogyny in his life, the current climate against women would be shocking.

Since Tiller’s murder, the legislative agenda against reproductive justice—and common-sense decency—has been staggering.

Are Most Americans Really 'Pro-Life'?

A Gallup poll released this week showed that the percentage of Americans who identify as “pro-choice” is at an all-time low of 47 percent, while 50 percent identify as “pro-life.” But does it really matter?

Most Americans still believe abortion should be legal, and the outrage over recent attempted rollbacks of women’s reproductive rights has sparked a new wave of activism among feminists online and off.

The anti-choice movement may be winning on labels, but they’re losing on the issues.

Year of the (Young) Woman


In this image made from Thursday, Feb. 23, 2012 video provided by C-SPAN, Sandra Fluke, a third-year Georgetown University law student, testifies to Congress in Washington. (AP Photo/C-SPAN)

Komen. Sandra Fluke. Transvaginal. The reason these words are instantly recognizable—the reason the “war on women” is now part of the national conversation—is largely thanks to younger women and online organizing. Behind every recent battle against the onslaught of sexism has been the energy and activism of young people—on blogs, Twitter, Tumblr and Faebook. And in a long-overdue but welcome change of message, the mainstream feminist movement that once claimed young women didn’t care about feminism is finally catching on. Some are even walking the walk.

MCA’s Feminist Legacy

The news of Adam Yauch’s death felt like a punch to the stomach. It wasn’t just because I was a fan. (Though it should tell you something about the level of my love for this band that on the day of Yauch’s death I got an e-mail from an ex I had parted ways with ten years ago checking in on me.) It wasn’t just because—like a lot of people who grew up during a certain time in New York City—the Beastie Boys felt like a cultural touchstone.

For a female hip hop fan—for this female hip hop fan, at least—the Beastie Boys meant so much more. 

Much has been made of Yauch’s Buddhism and dedication to philanthropy. Pieces have even acknowledged the Beastie Boys’ explicit move towards feminism by noting, in passing, MCA’s famous line from “Sure Shot”:

Five Overlooked Battles in the War on Women

Media coverage of the Republican “war on women” has largely focused on the attempted rollbacks of reproductive rights and the all-too-frequent sexist gaffes that are plaguing the GOP these days. (I, for one, will never tire of aspirin between the knees jokes.) While seeing so much ink spilled over feminist issues warms my heart, the focus on abortion and birth control has let Republicans off way too easily.

After all, this isn’t really a new war—the assault on women’s rights has been happening for as long as women have been demanding them. This systemic and structural hatred of women is basically politics as usual—we’re just paying better attention. While it makes sense to shine a light on the onslaught of anti-choice legislation and sentiment of late, we can’t forget that misogyny doesn’t stop there. Here are a few more battles (in no particular order) to think about, and take action on.

1. Lack of Paid Parental Leave. You would think given the Romney camp’s manufactured outrage over Hilary Rosen’s comments that Ann Romney “hasn’t worked a day in her life,” that issues of parenting and economics would be at the top of everyone’s political to-do list. Not so much. The United States is the only industrialized nation without mandated paid parental leave—leaving American parents, mothers especially, in a terrible financial bind. Parents spend tremendous portions of their income on childcare, so much that some women have found that it makes more financial sense to go on welfare and stay at home than to have a job in which the bulk of their income goes to childcare. If motherhood is a “real job” or “the most important job in the world”—let’s treat it as such.

What Feminists Can Learn From the GOP

Before the Senate reauthorized the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) yesterday, Republicans tried a bit of quick maneuvering to save face. Instead of simply voting against the legislation and further alienating American women, Republicans put forward an amendment that was essentially a watered-down VAWA—a version of the bill that left out “controversial” provisions for same sex couples, immigrants and Native women.

The amendment failed and VAWA was passed in a 68-31 vote, but this attempt by the GOP serves as an important reminder to feminists that ignoring the most marginalized among us isn’t just bad strategy, it’s a callous disregard for the movement’s most basic tenets.

VAWA is undoubtedly a feminist success story. It has allocated billions of dollars to services for sexual assault and domestic violence survivors, and since passing in 1994, reporting of domestic violence has increased by as much as 51 percent. It makes sense, then, that the legislation has long had bipartisan support—after all, who opposes creating services for victims of sexual and domestic violence? But the inclusion of measures that would expand services to marginalized communities was just too much for Republicans to bear. Specifically, language in the bill would make it illegal to deny someone VAWA-funded services based on their sexual orientation or gender identity. Apparently, this non-discrimination provision is too “controversial” for Republicans.

Syndicate content