We've got a new Think Again column called "CBS and Dan Rather--Doing the Right's Dirty Work," and it's here.

My Nation column, "Where have you gone, William Safire?" is here.

Sal's got an interview with Hall & Oates and Pierce follows below, which is followed by more mail. Now here's Sal:

Alter-reviews: New H & O Box Set.

Do What You Want, Be What You Are, is the new 4 CD boxed set from the biggest selling duo of all time, the oft misunderstood Daryl Hall & John Oates. For almost 40 years, Hall & Oates have been recording together, topping the charts with hit after hit, while getting hit for their string of unfortunate MTV videos during the eighties. As a longtime, pre-MTV fan of the band, I've made a second career out of trying to convince the non-believers, that Daryl & John are so much more than "Maneater" & "No Can Do." This wonderful boxed set covers it all, from the pre-H&O material of Daryl & John's first bands, The Temptones and The Masters, to the early folk material found on their first two albums, to the middle 70s where they were finding themselves as rock 'n' soul artists, through their most successful period in the 80s, right on up to their most current achievements.

I had the pleasure of talking to both Daryl Hall and John Oates, (separately) and here's what they had to say.

ME:
So let's talk about the box. How difficult was it for you guys to decide on the final track list for this set?

DARYL:
Well, I did most of it, which is not unusual, and I had to listen. That was the only way to do it...to sit down, take every song, analyze it and listen to it in a big giant gulp. I'm not a nostalgic person, I don't go back and listen to my stuff. I don't think most artists do. But I had to and it was a real eye-opening experience, like getting a perspective on your whole life.

JOHN:
It was difficult. There were a lot of choices. How do you do it? How do you distill 450 songs into 74, or whatever it is? Obviously the hits had to be included, and they are. But we wanted to create a package for the hardcore fan who really knows us, give them some surprises...create something that maybe they never had, which we did with the unreleased selections. But for the casual fan who may only know us because of the hits, we wanted to show the depth of the material, the songwriting, and the production, the uniqueness of some of the things that we did that were above and beyond those songs that were so famous.

ME:
As I look at every Daryl Hall & John Oates record, each subsequent release seems so diverse from the one prior. It seems so natural for you, like you guys never experimented and failed. But as the biggest selling duo of all time, do you feel that your hits truly represent what you and Daryl originally set out to do?

JOHN:
No, not really. I mean, they represent a part of what we are. We came up as pop songwriters. Pop music to us was really the singles that we grew up with as kids. We were never really into the long, involved rock operas, the instrumental excursions and things like that. We were pretty succinct, pretty direct. But at the same time, we created a lot of adventurous things, in our...not only our songwriting but in our production and our record-making. And I think that they are the things that this box set gets to showcase.

ME:
Live From Daryl's House could be the best hour of television not on television. The last episode featured Todd Rundgren as a guest. You guys go way back, with Todd producing 1974's War Babies, a record that he says he "took the blame for," because the public perception was that he took you and John away from your soul roots. It's a record that sounds nothing like the record before it, 1973's Abandoned Luncheonette or its follow-up, the self-titled Silver Album from 1975, which included at that point, the biggest hit of your career, "Sara Smile." With three albums so radically different from each other, what was your mindset heading into the studio to record your next record, Bigger Than Both Of Us?

DARYL:
Well, I like to bust out. I've always tried to break the barriers. I have no creative fears, you know? Most people pay at least some kind of service to what they've been doing, and try to be a little more careful. They try to repeat their successes. We never really thought that way. Neither John or I, though he's a little more like that than I am. When we went in after the The Silver Album we were just looking ahead, man. We called the album Bigger Than Both Of Us, because we saw what we were doing and in some ways it WAS bigger than the both of us. We went into it with the idea that we were making some noise and people were responding to us.

JOHN:
I think we were trying to find ourselves. And you really have to include the first record as well, which is Whole Oates. It's a real, singer-songwriter, organic kind of record. I think if you take all four of those records...well actually it's the first three, Whole Oates, Abandoned Luncheonette, and War Babies...you take those three records and combine those various style elements, the singer-songwriter folky thing, the kind of R&B thing we got into, and the more experimental rock thing we got into with Todd, you take those elements, and then you listen to The Silver Album with "Sara Smile" on it, I think you'll hear all three of those on that record. And I think The Silver Album was the first time our sound started to coalesce into something. The Silver Album really brought it together."

ME:
The Silver Album got the most representation on this boxed set with 6 songs. Was that a conscious decision, or did that just happen?

DARYL:
(surprised) No, it wasn't a conscious decision. You're the first person to point that out. Really? Six songs from that album?

JOHN:
No it wasn't conscious. It was exactly the reasons I just mentioned. The Silver Album is really where, in the seventies, we really found ourselves. The three albums that followed, Bigger Than Both Of Us and unfortunately Beauty On A Back Street...if you look very carefully, there's not one song from Beauty On A Back Street on this box set. I hated that album. And for the rest of the seventies, for rather extenuating circumstances, the reasons being we were recording in L.A., we weren't comfortable, we were recording with Chris Bond and our relationship with him was deteriorating...that all came to its nadir at Beauty On A Back Street. It's probably the album I like...well, it's the album I hate. But then, from that point on, you look at "Red Ledge" and "X-Static," we started to rebuild and to lead ourselves to producing ourselves, which is where we had our most commercial success, so...it kind of went up and went down and went up again.

ME:
Now that the boxed set is finished, is there anything that was removed last minute that you wish could have made the final cut?

DARYL:
Yeah. Off hand I couldn't tell you what, because there are so many songs. We realized we had a 4 CD set to deal with and I came up with...at least...10, 12, maybe even more songs that could have easily gone on there and we had to whittle it down for time. But sure, there's a lot that I could have, or would have put on. But I am really happy with what I DID put on. Put it this way, nothing significant was left off. I fought and fought for anything that I thought was important. And Sony was really great. They really were on the same page.

JOHN:
Yeah, there are some things that could have gone on there, but then there are a few hundred things that could have gone on there. Where do you draw the line? What's gonna be really cool, what I think could be the highlight of this particular box set is the 7 or 8...I can't remember if it's 7 or 8 tracks from our first English appearance at the Victoria Theatre. (Ed. note: It's 5 tracks.) I can't remember if it was '74 or '75. I had that stuff on an old videotape which I transferred to a DVD and I started looking at it and I was really blown away by it. The band was young...and...when I think back as to the history of our amazing musicians and bands who have played with us over the years, that band, that particular ensemble never really stuck out in my mind as ever really being one of our better bands. But when I heard it now, as time has gone on, that band was unbelievable. The way they played and the way we played together...I was just actually amazed. I had completely forgotten about it. When you hear that, I think the hardcore fans are really gonna freak out.

ME:
"Storm Warning." Tell me about that.

DARYL:
That was an outtake from Change Of Seasons. "Storm Warning was a song by The Volcanoes, a band that was on Arctic Records, which was my first label. And one of the guys in The Volcanoes ended up being in The Trammps, you know, "Disco Inferno," and he also played on The Temptones records. John and I always loved that song. And we were fooling around in the studio during Change Of Seasons and we just cut that song.

JOHN:
That track was recorded live in the studio. We just about got it.

ME:
It's a killer! So what's next? Boxed set out, hopefully that's not the swansong.

DARYL:
Right now, I'm doing a Daryl solo record. I just signed with Verve Records. And of course, Daryl's House. As far as me and John, we don't have any immediate plans. John and I work together all the time, so we're never that far apart.

JOHN:
My next record is going to be a traditional, finger-picking folk album. No drums, just guitars and mandolins. I'm gonna do some Mississippi John Hurt, Doc Watson, all the stuff I loved when I was a kid. I'm gonna do that this winter and see where that takes me.

John Oates and I talked a bit about his recent solo release, the very moving and very folksy "1000 Miles Of Life," a record that takes you right back to the very beginning, with personal songs not unlike what can be found on the first two Daryl Hall & John Oates records. I asked Daryl Hall if there were any plans on releasing audio from "Live From Daryl's House." His reply, "Well, yeah. But you can only imagine the loopholes with all the labels involved."

I highly recommend "Do What You Want, Be What You Are," for both the casual and hardcore Daryl Hall & John Oates fans. Just skip "Maneater," if you really can't deal. There are 73 others to choose from.

Sal Nunziato
BURNING WOOD
www.burnwoodtonite.blogspot.com

Now here's Charles:

CHARLES PIERCE
NEWTON MA.

Hey Doc: "And if they don't give us what we like/Men, that's when you gotta go on strike."

Weekly WWOZ Pick To Click: "Surrey With The Fringe On Top" (Marlene Dietrich)--I met Bill Ayers at a ginmill in National Airport and he told me to tell you that I love New Orleans.

Short Takes:

Part The First: Andrew, pardon me, old son, but this is all my balls.

Part The Second: The Pythons debuted on British TV 40 years ago this week, thereby guaranteeing that I would never be able to listen to any BBC news reader with a straight face. ("Lemon curry?") Who knew, though, that one of their sketches would so presciently anticipate the current debate in this country over healthcare? We're all the John Cleese character, by the way.

Part The Third: All McCaughey's aside, when is it going to fall to the editor of ETL New Republic to apologize for the fact that the guiding light of his magazine is a complete f**king lunatic? Mary Robinson--a "frigid anti-Semite"? Get the net, somebody.

Part The Fourth: OK, we all had our fun with this bag of pious offal. However, spelunking a bit deeper we find this: "First Example - Liberal Falsehood: The earliest, most authentic manuscripts lack this verse set forth at Luke 23:34:[7] Jesus said, 'Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.' Is this a liberal corruption of the original? This does not appear in any other Gospel, and the simple fact is that some of the persecutors of Jesus did know what they were doing. This quotation is a favorite of liberals but should not appear in a conservative Bible."

"Some of the persecutors of Jesus did know what they were doing."? I don't think I need the Enigma Machine here. Next stop--Oberamaggau.

Part The Fifth: Just die already, ok? Better publications are going out of business and this worthless pile of drivel doesn't even have a cold? Yoicks.

Part The Penultimate: James, bubba, if you're going to rip a meathead like Glenn Beck about the fact that he knows about as much about sports as he does about political theory--i.e. not enough to throw to a cat--you really shouldn't be talking about "hockey courts."

Part The Ultimate: I feel safe in predicting that this is an experiment that will result in chaos, disorder, and some really, really bad writing that thinking people will hate with the heat of a thousand white-hot suns. And that it would have done all this even in 1958, when the idea was fresh.

I am admittedly not an expert on the culture and politics of what we all used to call the Near East. I am particularly not expert on the politics and culture of Afghanistan--which, come to think of it, puts me in roughly the same boat as Alexander The Great, several Caesars, a handful of British PM's, and Leonid Brezhnev, all of whom down through the centuries paid far more dearly for their ignorance than I ever will. But I do know that there is in this country a seriously building sense that the war there has spiraled beyond any rational attempt to control it. Correct me if I'm wrong but what I see now is a vicious and expanding tribal conflict the roots of which go back beyond the invention of movable type, and one that's now energized by a thoroughly modern war between several thoroughly modern drug cartels, all of which is taking place right on top of the least stable member of the Nuclear Bomb Club. And we're the referees. How this is possibly a coherent foreign policy moving forward is, I confess, beyond me, but it's going to be what finally blows up the Obama Administration politically. Of that, I am certain.

Name: Ben Miller
Hometown: Washington, DC

Mr. Alterman,

I am reading today on Washingtonpost.com an article about the Virginia Governor race and that the latest poll is troubling for Democratic candidate Creigh Deeds (Poll May Point to Democratic Worries Beyond the Old Dominion). It then talks about how the numbers in Virginia may point to larger problems for democrats in other states and nationally.

The article ends with this curious sentence in the final paragraph, "But all Democrats have a stake in trying to show that the electorate that put Obama in the White House was more than a one- time phenomenon built around his personality." His personality? Is that just a poor word choice on the part of the Post or do they really think that is the only reason Obama got elected? It had nothing to do with his brain, his ideas, it was his winning smile. It wasn't the utter failure by any possible measuring stick of the outgoing Republican administration, it was Obama's ability to tell jokes that won him the election.

Name: Derek Lessing
Hometown: Philly

Responding to Amy Billings from Portland: Do other Note commenters respond to your posts? If so, then I'd say keep on posting: you're getting under the skin of other regular readers, and, especially if your comments kick off long, contentious threads, then I'd guess this attracts the attention of the original authors and maybe even an editor or two. Will anything change? Heck, who knows. More power to ya, though, for doing this.

Name: Timothy Barrett
Hometown: Louisville Ky

Amy Billings asked whether she can ever expect the mainstream media to get better at journalism. The line between reporting and editorializing has been forever blurred. We haven't really expected much from television news for some time. Even the interviews are either cloyingly absurd exercises in softball tossing or gotcha type hostile catfights with every speaker frantically yelling above the din. The print media, what is left of it, are ideological periodicals (you get what you pay for here) or skeletal remains of once prouder newspapers. Most have thinned the herd or reporters to so few that most of the paper is syndicated reports from the AP or one of the national conglomerates.

So most of us who want actual analysis, based on at least the facts as they are known at the time, rely on the internet. However, the glossiest sites are owned by the same media moguls who have watered down or ruined once great outlets. We must find what we can among the millions of blog sites. Build your favorites and make sure to include writers you disagree with but who practice the fine art of journalism. Only then will you build a world view that you can trust. Reading only what resonates with you will narrow your perspective and trap your mind.

So what is my answer about will they improve. Yes, they will, because the cream always rises. They are selling the product our ideologically partisan consumers want today. But we are recognizing the falsity of their wares. As they slowly ride toward the fringe, the mainstream will begin to attract the talent that will demand ethical standards and valid logical analysis. These things take time.

Name: Stephen Carver
Hometown: La La Land

As a Cronkite kid who saw Vietnam every night, and watched as Dan Rather went from boy wonder journalist to head of the news division at the Tiffany network, watching what CBS did to him has been truly sad for me. I am also a Texan, and watching Cronkite and Rather "tell it like it is" was what made me, at one point, consider a career in journalism.

I admire Rather's fortitude in moving forward with his lawsuit, even if it proves to be fruitless, and hope someday to find out who forged those National Guard documents (if they were indeed forged), because THAT is the crime here.

Unfortunately, I think Mr. Rather's television fall is what has allowed things like Faux News to rear it's ugly head. Television anchors report to their corporate bosses much like serfs used to report the their overlords; telling them exactly what they want to hear, the truth be damned.

If there is a sadder state of affairs in this nation right now than the decline and fall of journalism, I don't know what it is. When no one is there to point to the fox in the hen house, then the fox can do anything it wants, and that's just the way Corporate America wants it.

Bread and circuses. Where's the bread?

Name: David Ellis
Hometown: Whitefish, Mt.

Thanks, Mr. Alterman. I worked for a long time in the TV business and saw how corrupt, arrogant and twisted it is. I also spent 6 years fighting a lawsuit (which I miraculously won) defending rights for whistleblowers. We need more truth tellers, like yourself. I'm not gonna tell you or myself any lies as to what we're up against. But here's a sincere THANK YOU for telling the truth.

Name: Seymour Friendly
Hometown: Seattle,WA

Re: Nader "wasting the world's time".

Dear Sir:

Mr. Nader, regardless of his flaws, has done more to benefit the US in one year of his life than you personally will be able to point to on your death bed, reflecting back over your career. In case you haven't noticed, your primary contribution appears to be music reviews at this point, and "Altercation".

Placing that aside, in case you haven't noticed, the Democrats are busily proving that, even with complete control of legislative and executive branches of the government, they are complete unable, or unwilling, to function as a body and provide basic progressive reform.

Certainly Nader is at this point long past due for retirement. However, his slings and barbs at the Democrats seem awfully accurate.

Name: Alice de Tocqueville
Hometown: Martinez, CA

A nation that wouldn't have Ralph Nader in its government is not worth saving. It has no human pride, or values, no belief in decency, no belief in itself. Just like the US. That doesn't mean I've read his novel.

Eric replies: "Go ask Alice... She's ten feet tall

Contact Eric Alterman

Use this form to contact Eric Alterman.

Full Name (required)

E-mail address (required)

Hometown (required)

Message

 Subscribe me to EmailNation, our free e-mail newsletter

 You can send me information about subscriptions and special offers to my e-mail address.

 You can send me information about subscriptions and special offers to my postal address.