Web Letters: Public Option Now!

Editorial

This article appeared in the July 20, 2009 edition of The Nation.

July 1, 2009

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

If you prefer, you may submit a letter to the print edition only.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • To make the record crystal clear: a majority of American physicians now favor a single-payer solution, similar to what our neighbors in Canada employ. This was indicated by a poll published in the Annals of Internal Medicine (the largest survey ever conducted among doctors on the issue of healthcare financing reform). Fewer physicians, it should be noted, were in favor of incremental reform, such as the "public option" being floated by team Obama.

    Congressional votes appear to be bought by the $1.4 million per day that the for-profit healthcare industry spends lobbying. How else do we explain the sad spectacle of Congressmen and Congresswomen trotted out on camera as spokesmodels to defend our broken health insurance system that works "for the wealthy and the healthy" (to paraphrase Ezekiel Emanuel)? If the votes weren't for sale, one doubts that industry would spend so much money. So you should be crystal clear about that: when you write that key Senate Democrats are vulnerable to "pressure from the healthcare industry," the sentence should be read as describing acts of legalized bribery that appear to be determining the future of healthcare in this country.

    Except for the lobbying money and the part about working "for the wealthy and the healthy," our present system has absolutely nothing to recommend it.

    Myles Sussman

    San Francisco, CA

    07/07/2009 @ 01:25am


  • I'd bet that a majority of doctors and other medical professionals would not fall for this trap.

    How would you plan to force them to take the puny payments, which often don't even cover the doctors' and hospitals' expenses?

    Should we adopt the system that is falling apart in slow motion next door in Canada?

    John D. Froelich

    Upper Darby, PA

    07/03/2009 @ 5:45pm


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Notion

Bad Black Mothers | For African American women, reproduction has never been an entirely private matter.
Melissa Harris-Lacewell
Posted at 7:59 PM ET

» The Beat

Reagan Would Fail "Purity Test" Proposed for GOP | RNC right-wingers say their ideological correctness standard for candidates is rooted in Reaganism. But the former president would flunk.
John Nichols
73 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

A Kingdom of Bicycles No Longer | China's ambassador for climate change speaks on the eve of the Copenhagen summit meeting.
Robert Dreyfuss
34 Comments

» Act Now!

Coal Country | "This is a civil war."
Peter Rothberg
83 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around the Nation | The week we went Rouge. Plus, Moyers on Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
110 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | The "Second Amendment" sale; the raving paranoids of the right.
Eric Alterman