Web Letters: Will Afghanistan Be Obama's Vietnam?

By VideoNation

June 4, 2009

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • I suspect that Afganistan is to America as it was to the USSR--a war too costly to win. This was Gorbachev's conclusion when told of the resources, 500 thousand troops, needed for "victory."

    Staying is a disaster, especially as a foreign army provokes resistance and greater, not less, regional instability, than does leaving.

    Frank P. Johnston

    Grand Falls, NB

    06/06/2009 @ 11:49am


  • We have to build schools and make sure everyone attends and learns how to read and write and do math.

    The children of Afghanistan must grow up with twenty-first-century skill sets, and especially the girls.

    Shooting the bad guys and leaving is what we did in 1980, and now here we are almost thirty years later back there again with the same mess on our hands.

    We have to build some kind of real economy for them.

    They must learn that Islam is a peaceful religion, and they will only learn that if they can read and write for themselves.

    I am a progressive, and these are my progressive views.

    Gary Amstutz
    The Democratic Club of Kern River Valley

    Lake Isabella, CA

    06/05/2009 @ 12:55am


  • Katrina, should we withdraw and give a tacit OK to the Taliban, when it comes to questions like splashing battery acid on the eyes and faces of little girls who want to go to school?

    To many of us, opposition to such action is the progressive course to follow.

    What should America do? Do you care?

    If this is not a war justification, what is?

    I have asked this repeatedly in other posts, without any answer.

    How many such atrocities are you willing to tolerate instead of crushing?

    Without an answer to this point, you have no popular credibility, and that is the main reason your movement, which seems to favor acompromise with this type of action, cannot get popular traction. Compromise with barbarism is not progressive!

    John D. Froelich

    Upper Darby, PA

    06/04/2009 @ 12:42pm


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Beat

Reagan Would Fail "Purity Test" Proposed for GOP | RNC right-wingers say their ideological correctness standard for candidates is rooted in Reaganism. But the former president would flunk.
John Nichols
69 Comments
Posted at 1:19 PM ET

» The Dreyfuss Report

A Kingdom of Bicycles No Longer | China's ambassador for climate change speaks on the eve of the Copenhagen summit meeting.
Robert Dreyfuss
34 Comments

» Act Now!

Coal Country | "This is a civil war."
Peter Rothberg
83 Comments

» The Notion

A Blow to Privatization in Israel (and Perhaps Beyond) | A potentially historic ruling on prison privatization, in Israel.
Eyal Press
33 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around the Nation | The week we went Rouge. Plus, Moyers on Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
110 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | The "Second Amendment" sale; the raving paranoids of the right.
Eric Alterman