Web Letters: Why Obama Needs Tough Love

By VideoNation

May 22, 2009

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • The man has boxed himself into a corner. You can sum up his difficulty in three simple points.

    1. He cares about the rule of law. He said so standing in front of the Constitution the other day, and he’s a constitutional lawyer. He’s said it before.

    2. The law is entirely--100 percent--a matter of punishing people who have committed crimes in the past. The only direction the law ever looks is back into the past. It never looks ahead to punish you for what you may do in the future. To take up the rule of law is precisely to turn your face to the past. This is plain fact, beyond dispute or debate.

    3. But this man would like to look forward into the future, not back into the past. Instead of punishing people in the Bush administration for crimes they commited in the past, he wants to punish other people for crimes they may commit in the future. He’ll need to punish them without a trial, since a court of law knows nothing about trying people for what they may do in the future.

    You can buy either 1 or 3. But in the light of 2, you can’t buy them both. If you care about the rule of law, you need to give up 3. If you want to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution, that’s your only option.

    The man needs our help, even more than he did during the election.

    Stephen Voss

    Istanbul, Turkey

    05/29/2009 @ 3:38pm


  • By disingenuously using religion as his sole reason for denying "fundamental" civil rights to one class of his fellow Americans, Barack Obama has betrayed his oath of office not once but twice, for he violates the First Amendment ("separation of church and state") for the nefarious and invidious purpose of denying a "fundamental" civil right right (marriage) guaranteed under the Fourteenth Amendment's "due process" and "equal protection" clauses. By doing this, this so-called "civil rights lawyer" has betrayed his heritage and, most of all, he has betrayed the fundamental principal of equal protection he taught as a professor of law. This dynamic is a no-brainer that should not escape one of his first-year law students. See my article "Untangling Barack Obama's audacious mumbo jumbo" and, for a complete analysis of the issue, my Salon.com blog.

    John P. Mortimer, Esq.

    San Francisco, CA

    05/28/2009 @ 6:24pm


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Notion

Bad Black Mothers | For African American women, reproduction has never been an entirely private matter.
Melissa Harris-Lacewell
Posted 31 minutes ago

» The Beat

Reagan Would Fail "Purity Test" Proposed for GOP | RNC right-wingers say their ideological correctness standard for candidates is rooted in Reaganism. But the former president would flunk.
John Nichols
71 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

A Kingdom of Bicycles No Longer | China's ambassador for climate change speaks on the eve of the Copenhagen summit meeting.
Robert Dreyfuss
34 Comments

» Act Now!

Coal Country | "This is a civil war."
Peter Rothberg
83 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around the Nation | The week we went Rouge. Plus, Moyers on Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
110 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | The "Second Amendment" sale; the raving paranoids of the right.
Eric Alterman