Web Letters: The Border Violence Myth

By Gabriel Arana

May 27, 2009

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • What is really sad is that the national media has bled into local media markets, like our little rural market media owned by Fox, and has begun to feed international sensationalism rather than local news events. A local murder barely gets coverage. NPR is possibly the only trusted media source available, and that is only via the BBC at five o:clock in the morning.

    James L. Pinette

    Caribou, ME

    06/01/2009 @ 09:40am


  • I understand Mr. Arana's concern regarding the militarization of our borders, but to state that border violence is a myth is simply irresponsible. Last week in Tijuana, four kidnappers were caught, two of them were Americans; one from La Mesa, California, the other from Los Angeles. They openly admitted being a cell group who work for "El Teo"--ever heard of him? At their safe house were various weapons including AK-47s, AR-15s, police equipment and hundreds of cartridges:

    The week before, a "coyote" was caught in Tijuana, with weapons and dope and eleven people he was planning to smuggle across the border. He too, openly admitted working for El Teo, and threatened the Federal Preventative Police who had captured him. Obviously, El Teo is in the human smuggling business and has operatives from the United States working for him:

    That same week, a little boy who had been kidnapped from his home in San Bernadino was found in Mexicali by the Mexican Municipal Police.

    The FBI reported in 2008 that twenty-six people had been kidnapped from San Diego in the previous year:

    Just recently, another San Diegan from Mira Mesa was kidnapped, found badly beaten, handcuffed, wandering the streets of Playas de Tijuana.

    It is no secret that leading members of the Arellano cartel have washed their dirty money and bought gorgeous home in East San Diego county, putting these homes in various relatives names. The point is, they are already "here."

    Surely you cannot deny that Phoenix is now the kidnapping capital of the United States, and that these kidnappings are run by Mexican organized crime. Although the victims are either illegal immigrants or somehow related to the drug business, does that make this any less violent? Are illegal immigrants to be considered subhuman, not an indicator of a violent spillover from the drug wars?

    Even the attorney general of California, Jerry Brown (whom I deeply admire) has stated that our own government is overlooking the dangers to Americans from drug war spillover and that comparing extremist groups, the danger is more eminent from the cartel criminals: "Those [criminals] for the average Californian or the average American, may be a more immediate threat to their well-being."

    A recent intelligence report from Stratfor has indicated that the cartel influence is resulting in an increased amount of corruption to our agencies, surely you cannot deny that this in itself is spillover violence. We must not risk the illusion of a Neville Chamberlanesque outlook, for by doing so, we risk the great opportunity to rethink ending prohibition of some drugs and creating a more healthy society by providing treatment and education programs.

    Marjorie Ann Drake

    Rosarito Beach, Baja California Norte

    05/30/2009 @ 8:18pm


  • When the head of the Green Party in Mexico calls for the reinstatement of the death penalty because of the drug violence, there would seem to be a serious problem with the drug cartels. If anything, the American mainstream media didn't report on it for a long time because, it might interfere with trade between the US and Mexico. I believe it would be in Mexico's national interest to put the Mexican army along the border to prevent the smuggling of weapons to the drug cartels. This is not about Mexico as a nation, or Mexicans as a people. It is about the suffering of the Mexican people because of drug violence.

    Pervis James Casey

    Riverside, CA

    05/28/2009 @ 12:16pm


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Beat

Another Helping of FDR Please | Obama should follow the New Deal president's example and make his Thanksgiving Proclamation a call for economic justice.
John Nichols
5 Comments
Posted at 0:24 ET

» Editor's Cut

Filibuster Follies | "The filibuster has become a cancer growing inside the world's greatest deliberative body."
Katrina vanden Heuvel
66 Comments

» The Notion

Bad Black Mothers | For African American women, reproduction has never been an entirely private matter.
Melissa Harris-Lacewell
88 Comments

» Act Now!

Coal Country | Stunning film reveals new dimensions to the cost of America's over-reliance on coal.
Peter Rothberg
103 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

A Kingdom of Bicycles No Longer | China's ambassador for climate change speaks on the eve of the Copenhagen summit meeting.
Robert Dreyfuss
57 Comments