Web Letters: More Mortgage Madness

By Kai Wright

This article appeared in the May 18, 2009 edition of The Nation.

April 29, 2009

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

If you prefer, you may submit a letter to the print edition only.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • Wright misses a major part of this story: Why did the Gallons get a loan from Option One? Under what terms? Was it a cash-out refinance? Did they have a stated income loan with no money down to purchase their home? There is a reason they had a subprime loan--most likely a poor credit history showing they did not pay their credit obligations on time in the past. Wright only tells the end of the story so he can show the banks in a bad light; somehow this is supposed to make the family a sympathetic victim of the big bad lender. Telling the whole story, however, may show that the Gallons are in the exact position they should be in, losing a home they never should have bought or losing a home because they have pulled out equity and spent it. What's the whole story?

    Dennis C. Smith

    Long Beach, CA

    05/08/2009 @ 12:51pm


  • I have been renting for thirty years because I couldn't afford a house. It was evident that I still could not afford a home in the area I wanted to live, no matter what the fancy loans offered between 2002 and 2007. It's simple: I looked at my salary and I looked at the price of homes. No need to read any loan document. So guess what, I didn't buy a house.

    So now, according to this article, it is my moral obligation to subsidize with my falling 401[k] and taxes not only Wall Street insanity but also consumer buying insanity.

    Bailing out people who bought what they could not afford is no different than bailing out the financial institutions who destroyed a whole economy because of their greed.

    Please, enough with the "victim" model of looking at life. Why is it always the fault of others? When will Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives finally mature beyond pointing the finger at each other?

    There is no they or them responsible for my misery. There is only "we," and it is only when we look at ourselves and take responsibility for our own lives that the planet will heal.

    Chris Jones

    Los Angeles, CA

    05/05/2009 @ 8:03pm


  • Just goes to show that when you deal with financial guys you are dealing with crooks. Before signanything, get a lawyer to look at it.

    Paul Citro

    Fprt Lauderdale, FL

    05/02/2009 @ 2:47pm


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Beat

Sanders Won't Back Reform Bill That Lacks Public Option | “It is my intention to do everything I can to see that a strong bill is passed which provides universal coverage in a cost-effective way."
John Nichols
Posted 41 minutes ago

» Editor's Cut

Filibuster Follies | "The filibuster has become a cancer growing inside the world's greatest deliberative body."
Katrina vanden Heuvel
97 Comments

» The Notion

Bad Black Mothers | For African American women, reproduction has never been an entirely private matter.
Melissa Harris-Lacewell
95 Comments

» Act Now!

Coal Country | Stunning film reveals new dimensions to the cost of America's over-reliance on coal.
Peter Rothberg
115 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

A Kingdom of Bicycles No Longer | China's ambassador for climate change speaks on the eve of the Copenhagen summit meeting.
Robert Dreyfuss
59 Comments