Web Letters: US Must Stop Mixed Signals on Iran

By Roane Carey

April 13, 2009

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • Unless Israel launches a pre-emptive attack on Iran, there will be no conventional missile strikes from Iran. Iran cannot use nuclear weapons against Israel without taking out the Palestinians, the holy city of Jerusalem and part, if not all, of neighboring Islamic countries.

    Unlike the Israeli strike against Iraq's nuclear facility, Iran's nuclear facilities are active and loaded with nuclear material. A "successful" attack on such facilities would produce a number of Chernobyls and radioactive fallout, depending on wind direction, that would eventually cover the Middle East and the Indian subcontinent. They still haven't tamed Chernobyl!

    Besides supporting the Palestinians, Iran is annoyed with Israel because they trained the Shah's secret police. The Shah came to power through a CIA coup against a freely elected leader who posed a threat to British and American oil interests.

    Despite their dislike for Israel, Iran has Jewish citizens living in safety in that country. Iranian diplomats also saved some Jews from the holocaust during WWII.

    No one is totally innocent or guilty in any country.

    Pervis James Casey

    Riverside, CA

    04/16/2009 @ 3:21pm


  • I cannot understand why any person would defend Iran. Iran was responsible for directing, arming and training Hezbollah, who murdered 251 marines during the Reagan adminstration via a car bomb in Lebanon; Iran has blown up Kobar Towers in Saudia Arabia, murdering eighteen US soldiers; the 8,000 rockets Hezbollah targeted at Israeli cities in 2006 were given to them by Iran; Iran has blown up the Israeli Embassy in Argentina and the Jewish Cultural Center in Argentina; Iran funds, arms and trains Hamas, which has conducted suicide bombings against Israeli men, women and children, murdering hundreds on buses, in restaurants and supermarkets; and Iran calls for Israel to be wiped off the map. Is this the country Obama has no problem with enriching uranium?

    One can speak about the other nuclear powers all they want, to absurdly claim that if they can have a bomb, so should Iran, but when is the last time America, France, Russia, England, China and Israel sent suicide bombers into public places to murder civilians, blew up embassies, sent thousands of rockets towards another countries cities or called for another country to be wiped off the face of the earth? The Iranian government is a dictatorship with a crazy messianic view of Islam, and they should be the very last country ever allowed to obtain a weapon of mass destruction.

    I am Jewish and want to see a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and I think it's disgraceful that Avigdor Leiberman is the Israeli foreign minister. But that aside, Israelis on the right, the left and in the center all are deeply afraid of Iran's rush to obtain a nuclear weapon and the rest of the world should share that worry as well and do whatever it takes to stop Iran. Economic sanctions should be severe and force should be used only as a last resort; but a nation that rose from the ashes of the Holocaust cannot allow Iran to have a weapon of mass destruction.

    Mark Jeffery Koch

    Cherry Hill, NJ

    04/15/2009 @ 3:11pm


  • This politicking is, I suppose, necessary to impress the various lobbies who weigh in on this deal, but if President Obama really wants to change the equation, all he has to do is to threaten to cut off USAID support for Israel or even to slow up the transfers of cash on which the Israeli government depends (not to mention military spending which accounts for a large number of Israeli jobs), and we would hear a different tune from Israel.

    Anthony Stocks

    Rochester , MN

    04/14/2009 @ 9:32pm


  • I"m watching an administration being seduced by Washington and Wall Street and it is ugly.

    James L. Pinette

    Caribou, ME

    04/14/2009 @ 09:58am


  • The Israelis may be bellicose. but they're not stupid. They know America doesn't have the stomach for any additional military adventure, but they always want America to do their dirty work and die for them. Their favorite way of getting their cake and eating it also is to implement a false flag, something even Bush entertained in Iraq with a falsely painted UN plane. I wouldn't put it past the the new Israeli government to try that and thereby lure America into its war with Iran. It tried that with the USS Liberty in 1967 which backfired, but with thirty-four American casualties.

    stanley hersh

    New York, NY

    04/13/2009 @ 7:20pm


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Notion

Bad Black Mothers | For African American women, reproduction has never been an entirely private matter.
Melissa Harris-Lacewell
Posted 19 minutes ago

» The Beat

Reagan Would Fail "Purity Test" Proposed for GOP | RNC right-wingers say their ideological correctness standard for candidates is rooted in Reaganism. But the former president would flunk.
John Nichols
71 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

A Kingdom of Bicycles No Longer | China's ambassador for climate change speaks on the eve of the Copenhagen summit meeting.
Robert Dreyfuss
34 Comments

» Act Now!

Coal Country | "This is a civil war."
Peter Rothberg
83 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around the Nation | The week we went Rouge. Plus, Moyers on Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
110 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | The "Second Amendment" sale; the raving paranoids of the right.
Eric Alterman