Web Letters: Lifestyles of the Rich and Generous?

Subject to Debate

By Katha Pollitt

This article appeared in the March 23, 2009 edition of The Nation.

March 4, 2009

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

If you prefer, you may submit a letter to the print edition only.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • Obama's idea of stripping deductibility from the charitable donations of those families making over $250,000 per year is a horrible idea. Charities target their activities much, muh more efficiently than government does, and cutting off those funds is very counterprodeuctive.

    John D. Froelich

    Upper Darby , PA

    03/11/2009 @ 01:23am


  • You can start by chastising Barack Hussein Obama, who contributes nothing to his poor brother in the African hut. Then you can look at the numbers presented by the author. People who make $145,000 would contribute 5 percent of their earnings, leaving them a comfortable $137,500. This is wrong. The author did not take into account the taxes that that "rich" person pays. At that salary, taxes of 33 percent leave that person with only $100,000 a year. I will also assume that in order to earn that kind of salary that person will be working in a large metropolitan area, meaning the cost of living will far exceed the income they get to retain with out taxes. And if the State takes on income taxes, that person then is reduced to less than what they actually make. So the Third World should be happy with what we in the US give. This does not include all the contributions to the UN, who feeds the despots and tyrannical rulers first before the people it is meant to help. So I say, Enjoy your latte.

    Andrew Yañez

    Fort Worth, TX

    03/09/2009 @ 9:37pm


  • I will never understand this preoccupation with taking care of the world's poor when our own children are so severely neglected. I work at one of the poorest schools in Los Angeles, where 40 percent of the children meet the district's definition of homeless. What I deal with on a daily basis is beyond belief. RFK, MLK, LBJ would all be turning in their graves.

    We may all be Thains to the world's poor. However, the suggestion that we have to help the poor overseas reminds me of people who tell of being abused by parents who were the pillars of their community. You can't talk about do-gooding at the local soup kitchen, tithing your church and "pro-bonoing" the poor at work only to go home and beat your own kids. Donating to others will not absolve us of our guilt at home.

    We need to help our own first!

    Tascha Folsoi

    Santa Monica, CA

    03/08/2009 @ 10:37am


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Beat

Another Helping of FDR Please | Obama should follow the New Deal president's example and make his Thanksgiving Proclamation a call for economic justice.
John Nichols
8 Comments
Posted at 0:24 ET

» Editor's Cut

Filibuster Follies | "The filibuster has become a cancer growing inside the world's greatest deliberative body."
Katrina vanden Heuvel
67 Comments

» The Notion

Bad Black Mothers | For African American women, reproduction has never been an entirely private matter.
Melissa Harris-Lacewell
88 Comments

» Act Now!

Coal Country | Stunning film reveals new dimensions to the cost of America's over-reliance on coal.
Peter Rothberg
103 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

A Kingdom of Bicycles No Longer | China's ambassador for climate change speaks on the eve of the Copenhagen summit meeting.
Robert Dreyfuss
57 Comments