Web Letters: War Is Over (If You Want It)

The Liberal Media

By Eric Alterman

This article appeared in the March 16, 2009 edition of The Nation.

February 25, 2009

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

If you prefer, you may submit a letter to the print edition only.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • You should look it up, Mr. Alterman. August 7, 2001, is when Condi Rice showed Bush the infamous memo. The statement you referred to he made to a CIA agent who came down a few weeks later to reinforce the seriousness of the situation.

    Gregory F. Bachelis

    West Bloomfield, MI

    03/04/2009 @ 2:05pm


  • "Bush kept us safe" may be a meaningless mantra, but it is not purposeless. It works, as much of Republican propaganda works, by insinuation. What it implies, but does not say, is much more important than what it does say.

    The phrase "kept us safe" implies that we have been in danger, and that President Bush has been our shield. Repeating the phrase perpetuates the feeling that we are in danger. Bush was not really much of a uniter during much of his presidency, but he came closest to uniting US-Americans when they were most afraid. The on-message talking heads of the political right know instinctively that their mission is to maintain this fear, though only by insinuation. They won't tip their hand by saying literally what they want us to believe, which is "We're afraid and we want our president to protect us by waging war against all those we fear, whether they objectively threaten us or not."

    Of course, when viewed objectively, we haven't made ourselves measurably safer by waging pre-emptive wars. More likely, we have made ourselves less safe by antagonizing millions of people worldwide who were formerly favorably disposed toward us. But this doesn't concern the fear-mongers, provided that they can make their audience fear something even more than the bad situation that our bad policies have created. That something is the Unseen Enemy, which non-thinkers fear even more if they do not know what it is.

    These same non-thinkers can flatter themselves that their Big Brother, the strong and mighty Bush, has kept them safe, and that their enduring faith in their president has given him the power to do it. In this way, the mantra instantly cures the fear that it creates by sowing self-congratulation in its wake.

    The propagandists of the right may not have any idea what they're doing, but they know exactly what they're saying.

    Eric Paul Jacobsen

    West Saint Paul, MN

    03/03/2009 @ 08:14am


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Beat

Obama's "Finish the Job" Talks Seems to Set Stage for Afghan Tro | But Appropriations Committee chair Obey warns the move would "wipe out every initiative we have to rebuild our own economy."
John Nichols
Posted at 10:45 PM ET

» The Notion

Bad Black Mothers | For African American women, reproduction has never been an entirely private matter.
Melissa Harris-Lacewell
7 Comments
Posted at 7:59 PM ET

» The Dreyfuss Report

A Kingdom of Bicycles No Longer | China's ambassador for climate change speaks on the eve of the Copenhagen summit meeting.
Robert Dreyfuss
39 Comments

» Act Now!

Coal Country | "This is a civil war."
Peter Rothberg
83 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around the Nation | The week we went Rouge. Plus, Moyers on Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
114 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | The "Second Amendment" sale; the raving paranoids of the right.
Eric Alterman