Web Letters: Britain's Winter of Discontent

By D.D. Guttenplan

This article appeared in the March 2, 2009 edition of The Nation.

February 11, 2009

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

If you prefer, you may submit a letter to the print edition only.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • Like America, Great Britain is destroying its internal market by outsourcing its industries and the jobs that support it. As this article notes, they are also in-sourcing foreign labor that takes the jobs of British workers. No jobs and no disposable income to support an internal market. Great Britain used to be the industrial country. Alexander Hamilton was accused of being pro-British, but his tariffs were designed to protect infant American industries from British products. Great Britain had a twenty-year lead in the Industrial Revolution, and it was a powerhouse. A free trade relationship with the Brits meant they controlled your economy.

    China has replaced Great Britain and the US as the industrial state. Western business interests have outsourced industries and jobs to China, because labor is cheap, but intelligent. China is supposed to make the products, and the formerly developed Western countries are supposed to buy them. However, since Western industries have been outsourced along with their jobs, there is no market, because the disposable income from those jobs has also disappeared. Since China has cheap labor, Western disposable income was not in-sourced. China is dependent on an export economy that has lost its customers because the customers do not have the disposable income to buy China's products. China itself would be an excellent market, but cheap labor has no disposable income to develop the China market.

    We can all hold hands as the ship of globalization sinks, or return to national economics that limit the economic risks of globalized "free trade"!

    (I was looking at BBC this morning and, apparently, foreign companies can bid on contracts in the US, under the stimulus legislation. I would not be surprised if they also imported guest workers, under the twenty-some guest-worker programs authorized by Congress. These idiots don't get it--two-thirds of the American economy is supported by the disposable income of the American worker. If American workers are not employed, there will be no economic recovery.)

    Pervis James Casey

    Riverside, CA

    02/14/2009 @ 1:44pm


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Beat

Obama's "Finish the Job" Talk Sets Stage for Afghan Troop Surge | But Appropriations Committee chair Obey warns the move would "wipe out every initiative we have to rebuild our own economy."
John Nichols
11 Comments

» The Notion

Bad Black Mothers | For African American women, reproduction has never been an entirely private matter.
Melissa Harris-Lacewell
19 Comments

» Act Now!

Coal Country | Stunning film reveals new dimensions to the cost of America's over-reliance on coal.
Peter Rothberg
84 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

A Kingdom of Bicycles No Longer | China's ambassador for climate change speaks on the eve of the Copenhagen summit meeting.
Robert Dreyfuss
40 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around the Nation | The week we went Rouge. Plus, Moyers on Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
114 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | The "Second Amendment" sale; the raving paranoids of the right.
Eric Alterman