Web Letters: Screwed by the Fine Print

By Kia Franklin

February 10, 2009

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • After reading Kia Franklin's article this morning on binding arbitration, I feel compelled to write and tell you how grateful I am to you for publishing it.

    In 2007, I was subject to a binding arbitration fiasco of my own. I sued my former employer for breach of contract and fraud. I had a mountain of evidence on my side, but somehow the JAMS arbitrator conveniently overlooked all of that and the fact that my opponent was perjuring himself all throughout the deposition and proceeding, and decided against me. He ruled that I should pay my former employer's legal fees in addition to my own--even though my employer was insured. The total sum was right around a million dollars. Suddenly, instead of being entitled to back wages and damages, I was a debtor with no hope of appeal. I'm now in the process of declaring bankruptcy--a fate I never dreamed could ever happen to a guy like me.

    I agreed to the arbitration clause in my contract because I had no idea of the pitfalls of the process. And because of the inherent secrecy of arbitrations, I also had no idea that there were a string of former employees who had found themselves in the exact same predicament I was getting myself into with the same employer. My ex-boss knows how to play the arbitration system like Billy Joel on a grand piano--and there are countless others like him. This is a perversion that was never intended when the Federal Arbitration Act was originally passed by Congress in 1925. It was designed, of course, to be a process whereby only like-sized businesses could settle claims out of the congested court system; however, over the years it has become a hammer for big business to slam on the head of ordinary consumers.

    Only when people get angry about the usurping of their civil rights with this fascist tool will there be change. Everyone needs to write or call their Senators and Congressmen and demand that something be done about this Grand Canyon-sized loophole in our government. If you or someone you love hasn't been manhandled by the arbitration system yet, rest assured its only a matter of time.

    Ehren Bragg
    www.arbitrationhorrorstories.com

    Los Angeles, CA

    02/11/2009 @ 12:38pm


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Beat

Another Helping of FDR Please | Obama should follow the New Deal president's example and make his Thanksgiving Proclamation a call for economic justice.
John Nichols
62 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Filibuster Follies | "The filibuster has become a cancer growing inside the world's greatest deliberative body."
Katrina vanden Heuvel
92 Comments

» The Notion

Bad Black Mothers | For African American women, reproduction has never been an entirely private matter.
Melissa Harris-Lacewell
95 Comments

» Act Now!

Coal Country | Stunning film reveals new dimensions to the cost of America's over-reliance on coal.
Peter Rothberg
112 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

A Kingdom of Bicycles No Longer | China's ambassador for climate change speaks on the eve of the Copenhagen summit meeting.
Robert Dreyfuss
59 Comments