Web Letters: Bernard Madoff, Trust-Buster

Howl

By Nicholas von Hoffman

December 17, 2008

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • While I am appalled by Madoff's (pronounced Made-off--as though he were a Gilded Age character concocted by Twain), I find the lack of outrage at how Madoff swindled so many to be more indicative of the moral bankruptcy of this moment. Madoff was considered exclusive, a man to curry favor with to be invited into his investments, someone with a magic secret. Is anyone else appalled by the notion of black box trades--the idea that an investment banker approaches clients and they in turn place money into something about which they willingly do not ask, save but to read their quarterly earnings statements? The Madoff scheme went a long way to expose the enthusistic participation by many elites in such secret dealings, not out of "trust" as the NY Times is choosing to spin it, but probably something more corrosive and sinister. Swindling is swindling only when it happens to you, right?

    Nor am I sorry for many of the "victims." Some who built businesses and invested to retire on the money (including a man ill with cancer), and the charities, yes, but for many in this luxuriant, over-privileged class (how does a former mayor of a small city retire with $5 million?) I feel nothing.

    Melinda Gonzalez

    South Pasadena, CA

    12/23/2008 @ 04:04am


  • One aspect of the Madoff Ponzi scheme that has been neglected in the press is the question of who the early beneficiaries of the fraud were.

    A Ponzi scheme by definition is only a transfer. Early "investers" are paid a return greater than what the fund earned (I'm sure that some of the money actually was invested if only in temporary money market funds). Later "investers" are bilked.

    Madoff becomes then only an agent for those at the beginning of the scheme.

    They might have been aware of, or even designed the scheme. The early ones were certainly beneficiaries of the crime.

    The summary of those bilked, as described in the press, include institutions across the board, focused on Jewish institutions and not, for-profit and not-for-profit.

    There are many investment schemes that function as Ponzi schemes, even if not originally intentionally designed to be fraud. In ways, all speculation on commodities, homes, etc. are more transfers of assets than distribution of an institution's earnings.

    Richard Witty

    Greenfield, MA

    12/18/2008 @ 06:00am


  • There was a time that people worked for their money and their was a sense that for a cetain amount of work, people should be paid a certain amount of money. I guess these days are past: now we consider making money through money an honorable occupation. Until this year, when suddenly we start to see that all this making money through money isn't as honorable as we thought. I don't think it's just an accident and maybe there is a connection with our moral values. When I read that many "nonprofit" organizations are suffering from the Madoff financial scandal, my first thought is: what "nonprofit," they involved themselves in a system that promised them profits that were beyond reasonable and even if those profits were meant to go to the arts or other noble causes, the means to obtain those profits are immoral. It's sad when a country has become dependent on immoral action in order to be able to support all its government refuses to take care of.

    Vladimir Chelkov

    Chelyabinsk, Russia

    12/18/2008 @ 05:34am


  • As this article notes, we need to protect government pension funds from the hands of private enterprise. I am not a trusting soul, so I avoided 401(k)s when they were offered as a partial replacement for my government pension. Wall Street people are not real business people but high stakes gamblers with other people's money. Any government money given to Wall Street is going down a black hole, never to return. Any government pension fund or healthcare fund should be put into an independent government agency, which Congress or any other branch of government cannot spend or borrow from. Congress is run by combination of corporate-fascist Republicans and their fellow travelers the corporate Democrats, who are both "free traders" and could care less about this country and its people. They are beyond contempt! It is my opinion that they are committing economic treason. My only consolation is these idiots are destroying their own wealth. When you are dealing with sociopaths, you need to go for the throat!

    Pervis James Casey

    Riverside, CA

    12/17/2008 @ 5:23pm


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» Editor's Cut

Filibuster Follies | "The filibuster has become a cancer growing inside the world's greatest deliberative body."
Katrina vanden Heuvel
21 Comments
Posted at 10:13 ET

» The Beat

Obama's "Finish the Job" Talk Sets Stage for Afghan Troop Surge | But Appropriations Committee chair Obey warns the move would "wipe out every initiative we have to rebuild our own economy."
John Nichols
77 Comments

» The Notion

Bad Black Mothers | For African American women, reproduction has never been an entirely private matter.
Melissa Harris-Lacewell
36 Comments

» Act Now!

Coal Country | Stunning film reveals new dimensions to the cost of America's over-reliance on coal.
Peter Rothberg
90 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

A Kingdom of Bicycles No Longer | China's ambassador for climate change speaks on the eve of the Copenhagen summit meeting.
Robert Dreyfuss
42 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | The "Second Amendment" sale; the raving paranoids of the right.
Eric Alterman