Web Letters: The Right Choice at Treasury

Comment

By Christopher Hayes

November 17, 2008

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • For a great perspective on the current economic rape of America listen to a couple of interviews with Gerald Celente and Max Keiser. They are free MP3 downloads at http://drop.io/Summerbird. They are currently the two files at the top of the page.

    Edward Safranski

    New York, NY

    11/19/2008 @ 08:43am


  • Sheila Bair was quietly (probably because no one in the Bush administration would listen) pointing out the impending financial implosion for more than a year before it happened.

    She proposed a solution (again ignored) which had both social and financial value.

    If for no other reason than to reward someone who demonstrated competence, understanding and the technical ability to implement her solution, I sincerely hope the transition team picks someone who has acted in a totally non-partisan manner to use government to benefit the people who pay for it.

    She shows the best characteristics a government worker is capable of.

    Otis Maclay

    Houston, TX

    11/18/2008 @ 7:34pm


  • Your information on Hamilton is incomplete and inaccurate. The British had a twenty-year head start on the Industrial Revolution. The tariffs were designed to make British industrial goods more expensive so that infant American industries could be developed as part of the American market. It was Hamilton's desire to have an independent, self sustaining American market that was not dependent on foreign trade. If we had had unlimited trade with Britain, we would have never become a major industrial nation, and Great Britain would not have had our industrial support in two world wars. We would have become a banana republic without the bananas.

    Hamilton's "Report on Manufactures" was the blueprint for our economic development. We were a planned economy, and "free trade" had nothing to do with our economic success. No country can have any real development without trade barriers. My generation called a "free trade" relationship between a major industrial nation and an underdeveloped nation "economic imperialism," because there is no independence without economic independence. Hamilton understood the concept, though he never used the term.

    PBS had a "biography" on Hamilton that was loaded in favor of Wall Street and ignored his tariff policies. Hamilton's work for the Constitution was a collaborative effort, but he, alone, designed our economic success.

    Pervis James Casey

    Riverside, CA

    11/18/2008 @ 2:49pm


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» Act Now!

Coal Country | "This is a civil war."
Peter Rothberg
41 Comments

» The Notion

A Blow to Privatization in Israel (and Perhaps Beyond) | A potentially historic ruling on prison privatization, in Israel.
Eyal Press
19 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

Can China Help on Afghanistan? | Beijing wants a broader role in the Middle East and South Asia. Will Obama bring them in?
Robert Dreyfuss
43 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around the Nation | The week we went Rouge. Plus, Moyers on Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
85 Comments

» The Beat

Health Care Bill Advances, as Harry Reid Trumps Sarah Palin | The death panelist-in-chief rallied her followers to "KILL THE BILL." But 60 senators decided to follow the real leader.
John Nichols
106 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | The "Second Amendment" sale; the raving paranoids of the right.
Eric Alterman