Web Letters: Obama's Dream Team

By Katrina vanden Heuvel

November 5, 2008

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • Bill Brown for Secretary of State? I've never been overly impressed by his energy and enthusiasm; however, I've not been aware of his reluctance to spread NATO. In fact, I've never given thought to such a policy. Interesting. Sounds like a good idea. As for the others, I'm impressed by their open and honest stands. Cut waste and less secrecy. Sounds like a plan, and I will defer to your research and analysis. Now just sell it to Obama!

    Anthony Waters

    Fort Pierce, FL

    11/08/2008 @ 04:25am


  • While I find the proposed Dream Team admirable, I find the absence of women and minorities lamentable.

    Cuthbert Russell

    Southwest Harbor, ME

    11/06/2008 @ 07:43am


  • So, the fantasy continues here at The Nation. Not one, not a single name mentioned in this article will fill a post in an Obama cabinet. We know this. Just one day after the election convincing speculation names a militant reactionary and Clinton re-tread as Obama's prospective chief of staff (Rahm Emanuel) and another corporate servant and Clinton disciple as his secretary of the treasury (Larry Summers). This is change? You become who you are by the actions that you make. Obama has repeatedly betrayed the left with his actions. The empirical evidence offered by his voting record in the Senate is undeniable. He is who he is--a sell-out. To expect him to change miraculously is dangerous and delusional thinking. In fact, it is faith and not thought (and therefore, all the more dangerous).

    Still, there is hope. There is hope that progressives will watch Obama and the Democrats carefully and apply continous pressure to achieve the change we desire. If the Democrats fail to deliver as I fear they will, I still hope that progressives and the literature that they read, like The Nation, will see the proglems inherent to picking the least-worst candidate and will again join those of us still fighting the powers that be. We welcome you with open arms.

    William M. Novak

    Chester, MT

    11/05/2008 @ 7:50pm


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» Act Now!

Coal Country | "This is a civil war."
Peter Rothberg
38 Comments

» The Notion

A Blow to Privatization in Israel (and Perhaps Beyond) | A potentially historic ruling on prison privatization, in Israel.
Eyal Press
18 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

Can China Help on Afghanistan? | Beijing wants a broader role in the Middle East and South Asia. Will Obama bring them in?
Robert Dreyfuss
40 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around the Nation | The week we went Rouge. Plus, Moyers on Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
83 Comments

» The Beat

Health Care Bill Advances, as Harry Reid Trumps Sarah Palin | The death panelist-in-chief rallied her followers to "KILL THE BILL." But 60 senators decided to follow the real leader.
John Nichols
105 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | The "Second Amendment" sale; the raving paranoids of the right.
Eric Alterman