Web Letters: Why We Vote

Editorial

This article appeared in the November 17, 2008 edition of The Nation.

October 29, 2008

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

If you prefer, you may submit a letter to the print edition only.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • As a white, Jewish American I cast my vote this morning at 6 am proudly for Barack Obama. I know that he will win, and I am beaming with pride about America and I am very proud today to be an American. We've come a long way and we still have a long way to go but every American should be thrilled that we chose the content of someone's character rather than the color of his skin in deciding who our next president should be. I am 58 and have grown up during a time when blacks could not drink from the same water fountains as whites, use the same bathrooms or eat at the same restaurants. Finally, at long last, America has been transformed into a nation where we judge someone for their ability and not their race. I believe the greatness of America that so many people around the world admire and love will be restored by President Obama. Rejoice, America! We did it right, we did it well, and we just elected a great president!

    Mark Jeffery Koch

    Cherry Hill, NJ

    11/04/2008 @ 10:34am


  • I came to this country as a refugee thirteen years ago. One thing that surprised me here is a blatant lack of patriotism. There are so many people who prefer to keep the country on the wrong track, engaged in the wrong wars across the globe, than to admit their political convictions were wrong.

    If the wars were necessary to protect the national interest, why is it that the only big country that managed not to wage a single war over last fifty years--China--is the one developing most rapidly?

    Trust me as somebody who lived in a war zone for three years, there are no winners in war, just smaller and bigger losers.

    Don’t be confused by the victory in WWII. This country wasn't revitalized by the war but by the addition of women to the workforce, as well as the stupidity of the Europeans, who in order to wage their bloody wars had to rely on the USA for manufacturing and credit lines.

    The problem is that today we, in order to wage our wars, are relying on China for industrial production and credit lines.

    Isn’t it stunning that there are no mainstream media here in America to present those harsh facts in the living rooms of reckless voters? Remember, it’s not George W. Bush who put himself in the White House. We placed him there.

    Kenan Porobic

    Charlotte, NC

    10/31/2008 @ 10:53am


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Dreyfuss Report

A Kingdom of Bicycles No Longer | China's ambassador for climate change speaks on the eve of the Copenhagen summit meeting.
Robert Dreyfuss
10 Comments
Posted at 9:18 ET

» Act Now!

Coal Country | "This is a civil war."
Peter Rothberg
72 Comments

» The Notion

A Blow to Privatization in Israel (and Perhaps Beyond) | A potentially historic ruling on prison privatization, in Israel.
Eyal Press
28 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around the Nation | The week we went Rouge. Plus, Moyers on Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
93 Comments

» The Beat

Health Care Bill Advances, as Harry Reid Trumps Sarah Palin | The death panelist-in-chief rallied her followers to "KILL THE BILL." But 60 senators decided to follow the real leader.
John Nichols
123 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | The "Second Amendment" sale; the raving paranoids of the right.
Eric Alterman