Web Letters: Overcharged

By Emily Jane Goodman

This article appeared in the September 22, 2008 edition of The Nation.

September 3, 2008

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

If you prefer, you may submit a letter to the print edition only.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • Emily Jane Goodman rightly points out the injustices of a criminal justice system that strips judges of judicial discretion and mandatorily bills criminal respondents--in some instances for aspirin or for their transportation to court proceedings--and the fiscal incentives behind such surcharges and fees.

    Another example is those re-entering society who are forced to pay for their own parole or probation supervision, as well as for any anger management or drug counseling programs they are required to participate in, although they may have spent years on the inside taking similar courses.

    Further, people on parole from other states, such as Florida, but doing their parole time in New York State, for example, are subjected to the more stringent and higher costs of supervision under the Florida parole system. And regardless of whether they are employed, when the parolee falls short on their fees, Florida forces New York parole to take them into custody.

    As the cartoon by Ryan Inzana attached to Judge Goodman’s article implies, our society measures criminal respondents and ex-offenders by their monetary contributions without regard to their efforts to re-establish themselves as responsible parents or to secure work, or of extenuating circumstances. And, even if employed, payments to parole and various programs frustrate parolees who find themselves impoverished although employed.

    Although we give lip service to the value of re-entry services, we in fact offer a hand while we simultaneously kick them down.

    Michelle Karshan
    Alternative Chance/Chans Altenativ

    New York, NY

    09/09/2008 @ 3:10pm


  • While it may seem "cruel" to demand monetary restitution from those individuals who commit crimes against others, it is by no means a guarentee that removing this monetary component will not prevent a re-offense. Sometimes society has little recourse.

    A.J. Cook

    Dunwoody, GA

    09/08/2008 @ 2:00pm


  • I wish I could say I was shocked by what I read in this article.... But I'm not.

    It seems that yet, again, those who need our help most are those that are being charged and taxed far beyond their means.

    Slavery was outlawed in 1865. Peonage ended with the start of World War II. And, yet, this system is creating slaves once again--only this time it is to an unpaid debt.

    How do we keep letting this happen?!? Why are we not helping those who could be "brought back" into society to start fresh, as opposed to giving them more reason to loathe the system?

    Cindy Taylor

    St. Louis, MO

    09/05/2008 @ 09:50am


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» Editor's Cut

Around the Nation | The week we went Rouge. Plus, Moyers on Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
46 Comments

» The Beat

Health Care Bill Advances, as Harry Reid Trumps Sarah Palin | The death panelist-in-chief rallied her followers to "KILL THE BILL." But 60 senators decided to follow the real leader.
John Nichols
57 Comments

» The Notion

Palin as the Church Lady | Going Rogue book tour brings passive-aggressive rightwing Christianity to the fore.
Leslie Savan
144 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | The "Second Amendment" sale; the raving paranoids of the right.
Eric Alterman

» The Dreyfuss Report

Chongqing: Socialism in One City | China is managing the most important event in the world: the urbanization of half a billion people. Fast.
Robert Dreyfuss
218 Comments

» Act Now!

Toward Copenhagen | A guide to joining the movement against climate change.
Peter Rothberg
75 Comments