Web Letters: Wal-Mart: Political Bully

By American News Project

August 14, 2008

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • Who's the bully? The Employee Free Choice Act should more aptly be named the Union Coercion Act. By definition (to persuade [an unwilling person] to do something by using force or threats: they were coerced into silence. ). This is a more accurate description of this bill. Wal-Mart is only able to educate its employees as to the consequences of this bill. Since they, unlike the union, are unable to see how one votes, there can be no consequences threatened. The union, on the other hand can individually intimidate, threaten, and cause injury to those employees that don't cooperate. (There is a strong history of this.) The ballot must be secret to stop the intimidation from both sides. Both sides may educate and expose the benefits on a fair playing field. That is, unless the union can only compete when it can intimidate. There are far more instances of unions taking advantage of members than employers abusing employees. Unions have failed to organize Wal-Mart primarily because employees are happy with their situations. They hire many people that would have trouble being hired elsewhere, i.e., special needs, minorities and the elderly. Higher wages for these people can be earned through advancement thru Wal-Mart's strong "promote from with-in" policies. The employees would be better served wage-wise and benefit-wise if the hiring market was more competitive. Lax immigration policies have done nothing but flood our employment markets with low-wage earners that have kept wages down for so long. High corporate rate laws have chased our manufacturing overseas, and have left many of us in service industry jobs as a last resort. At this level we compete with illegals. Wake up! It is an employee's job to make as much money as he or she can, much as it is the responsibility of the company to make profits so it can grow and provide upward mobility to its employees. This is a delicate balance that only gets worse when the government gets in the way. This bill is nothing more than a return to the abusive power of unions. Unions have ruined the auto industry and the education system. They exist through intimidation and corruption. By supporting this bill you are only supporting the same within the Democratic Party. By chance, I read this article from Thomas Sowell on the same day I read about Wal-Mart. He may explain it more clearly than I.

    Bob Higgins

    Vero Beach, FL

    08/16/2008 @ 02:15am


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Beat

Obama's "Finish the Job" Talk Sets Stage for Afghan Troop Surge | But Appropriations Committee chair Obey warns the move would "wipe out every initiative we have to rebuild our own economy."
John Nichols

» The Notion

Bad Black Mothers | For African American women, reproduction has never been an entirely private matter.
Melissa Harris-Lacewell
12 Comments

» Act Now!

Coal Country | Stunning film reveals new dimensions to the cost of America's over-reliance on coal.
Peter Rothberg
83 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

A Kingdom of Bicycles No Longer | China's ambassador for climate change speaks on the eve of the Copenhagen summit meeting.
Robert Dreyfuss
40 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around the Nation | The week we went Rouge. Plus, Moyers on Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
114 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | The "Second Amendment" sale; the raving paranoids of the right.
Eric Alterman