Web Letters: The Canonization of St. Tim

Beat the Devil

By Alexander Cockburn

This article appeared in the July 7, 2008 edition of The Nation.

June 19, 2008

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

If you prefer, you may submit a letter to the print edition only.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • Thank good ness I wasn't the only one who thought all this fawning over Russert after his death was ridiculous. He was no more hard-nosed than the rest. Couldn't be otherwise, or no one would come on his show again.

    And now they have drafted his son to be on the MSNBC election coverage. Did this kid get a dregree in journalism? Has he followed politics? Give me a break!

    Martha Miller

    Appleton, WI

    08/07/2008 @ 10:08pm


  • I was pleased to see that Alexander Cockburn was not taken in by all the adulation of Tim Russert.

    Mr. Russert had Al Franken as a guest on his late-night show and was obnoxious, cruel and unprofessional. He displayed all these traits when he thought the camera had moved to a commercial--and it had not. He made a fool of himself, after trying for an hour to make a fool of Mr. Franken. It was extremely unsettling to watch, and I never tuned in to Russert's programs again.

    May we all rest in peace.

    Dot Drake

    Saint Paul, MN

    07/04/2008 @ 5:13pm


  • Media have jumped on the Russert Canonization, and Cockburn asks why?

    It is because Russert was the best journalist on television, because he was honest; and he was loved by Americans, a feeling the petty media will never know.

    Russert showed his weaknesses and his strengths, and his consistency earned him mass public trust.

    The rest of the media pack are just that--a pack. They can't stand in Russert's shadow. But, oh, how they try, hoping some of the admiration and love will rub off on them. How pathetic.

    Media rank lower in public approval than Bush, and for the same reasons--lies, lies, lies, all pushing doctrine instead of truth, all seeking self and glory and contracts instead of truth and humility.

    The media is what has brought the media down, not the Internet.

    Of course a group of lying fakes, all enamored with their own reflections in mirrors, tries to connect in public to Russert--not for admiration, but for their own vanity.

    Lorenzo Porricelli

    Huntington Beach, CA

    06/25/2008 @ 02:56am


  • I am continuously pleased when Alexander Cockburn validates my most innermost thoughts about "public events." Thank you for staying out "on the edge." We need you to stand against the forces of evil so those of us with less talent can have our views put to print.

    Sam Chandler

    Snohomish, WA

    06/25/2008 @ 02:22am


  • Thanks to Alexander Cockburn for speaking up about the real Tim Russert. I wanted to pass along a story about the 2004 interview with George Bush. The week before, I met Russert in Iowa. Everybody was fawning over him and he was lapping it up. I walked up to him and demanded, "When are you going to be as tough on a Republican guest as you are on the Democrats?" He said he always was. To which I replied, "Don't bullshit me, I watch the show. And you're not." As I say, the Bush interview was the next week, and was one of the toughest I'd seen for an Administration figure. It did make me wonder if our "chat" had anything to do with it.

    Chris Finnie

    Boulder Creek, CA

    06/24/2008 @ 7:45pm


  • I think that the press totally lost their professionalism in this instance.

    They gave way too much importance to a story about a friend and colleague. Russert seemed to be a nice person and a good friend to many in the news media. However the news media hijacked the press and airwaves with this story.

    CNN devoted a full evening to Russert. One person actually compared him to JFK.

    It really shows us that how journalists create the news and amplify it based on their personal whims.

    That's the important story and lesson behind the Russert coverage.

    John W. Babiak

    Montreal, Canada

    06/21/2008 @ 09:44am


  • I can't add a damn thing, damn it.

    Thanks.

    James Pinette

    Caribou, ME

    06/19/2008 @ 3:46pm


Most Read

Issues »

Most Emailed

Issues »

Popular Topics

Blogs

» The Notion

FDR Mania | Turn to News.Google.com, if you want to take the temperature of American hopes and fears right now.
Tom Engelhardt
Posted at 3:52 PM ET

» State of Change

Obama's Big Tent | His foreign policy team has more ideological continuity with the President-elect than contrasts.
Ari Berman

» Act Now!

World AIDS Day | How to help in the fight against the AIDS pandemic.
Peter Rothberg

» The Beat

Why Obama's Got "Complete Confidence" In Clinton | She won't bring the change his backers believed in. But Obama never really shared that belief.
John Nichols

» Editor's Cut

Robert Gates: Wrong Man for the Job | What we need after eight ruinous years is experience informed by good judgment.
Katrina vanden Heuvel

» The Dreyfuss Report

Obama's New Team at State, Defense, NSC | And some comments about why John Brennan didn't get the CIA job.
Robert Dreyfuss

» Passing Through

Forget GM's Plan -- Where's The Government's Plan? | Create a demand for green cars.
Jane Hamsher

» Capitolism

Is Personnel Policy? | How much do personnel choices reflect the Obama administration's policy direction
Christopher Hayes

» And Another Thing

Election Updates --Good News and Not | Details on some ongoing stories
Katha Pollitt