Web Letters: Supreme Court Deals Death Blow to Gitmo

By Jonathan Hafetz

June 12, 2008

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • Norman Ravitch, in his letter below, seems to be under the impression that the Constitution is like the Bible, a document that boasts over 600 versions. Sorry to disappoint him, but the Constitution is the only one of its kind, and the equal protection clause happens to be a time-tested amendment. He asserts that the Supreme Court ruling on gay marriages in the first place is not a federal but a state ruling--this is based on the state constitution, which appropriately reflects the nation's. Ravitch may not remember or believe this, but blacks used to be prevented in fact, barred by law, to marry whites. In Virginia, it was not until 1967 that that wholly illegal statute was struck down.

    I too am not particularly interested in seeing men marry men or women marry women, but I also recognize that marriage is an institution, subject to equal protection under the law to all. Ravitch's prejudices don't merit a hoot. As for the Guantánamo "detainees," as human beings on our soil, they like anyone else are now under our laws. If a foreign immigrant breaks one of our laws, he/she is due the prosecution he/she deserves. We cannot prosecute anyone according to our laws but deny them the same rights any accused person has under our laws. You cannot have it both ways.

    It's people who consistently think along the lines of thought Ravitch has expressed who, frankly, make this world a more dangerous place in which to live. I can only hope he is not fully in their camp.

    Riad Mahayni

    Richmond, VA

    06/13/2008 @ 2:58pm


  • If it were not enough that the California Supreme Court ruled against traditional marriage with no real justification except ideology, now the Federal Surpeme Court has extended rights to terrorists. What this means is that Barack Obama is sunk. McCain can claim with justification that the issue of judicial appointments points to his victory and not Obama's. If the left would only learn, but it is incapable of learning.

    The left refuses to understand SALVS POPVLI SVPREMA LEX.

    Norman Ravitch

    Savannah, GA

    06/12/2008 @ 6:21pm


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» Act Now!

Coal Country | "This is a civil war."
Peter Rothberg
25 Comments

» The Notion

A Blow to Privatization in Israel (and Perhaps Beyond) | A potentially historic ruling on prison privatization, in Israel.
Eyal Press
16 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

Can China Help on Afghanistan? | Beijing wants a broader role in the Middle East and South Asia. Will Obama bring them in?
Robert Dreyfuss
17 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around the Nation | The week we went Rouge. Plus, Moyers on Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
77 Comments

» The Beat

Health Care Bill Advances, as Harry Reid Trumps Sarah Palin | The death panelist-in-chief rallied her followers to "KILL THE BILL." But 60 senators decided to follow the real leader.
John Nichols
102 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | The "Second Amendment" sale; the raving paranoids of the right.
Eric Alterman