Web Letters: The Antiwar Plank

By John Nichols

This article appeared in the June 23, 2008 edition of The Nation.

June 5, 2008

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

If you prefer, you may submit a letter to the print edition only.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • While I completely agree on the need for a strong antiwar platform for the Democratic Party, I think it is all the more important for the antiwar forces--which I know involves not only many (and not all) Democrats, but some Republicans, independents--progressives. Above all, it is the antiwar sentiments and the work of the progressive forces in support of it that have won the primary for Senator Obama. Never in the last forty years has there been a better opportunity to expand the antiwar coalition in this country. By linking the economic plight of the poor and the middle class with the astronomical expenses of the war in Iraq, exposing the moral bankruptcy of US militarism, extolling its potential leadership in the world in changing the age-old practice of flexing military might as the only way to resolve national conflict, we have an opportunity to build a permanent antiwar, pro-peace national political force. We have an obligation to convince our citizens that just as we have a right to be concerned about our national security, so does every other country in the world. Without this basic premise, war remains the main instrument for resolving conflicts. What is needed is abandoning the sectarianism that has hobbled the antiwar peace movement in this country for a long time.

    M. Siddique

    Chevy Chase, MD

    06/09/2008 @ 11:08am


  • One of the best ways to ensure that we do not enter into conflicts such as the war in Iraq hastily and without serious deliberation is to modify the War Powers Act to include language that such actions would be funded solely by a surtax on the income of all individuals and corporations for the duration of the conflict. If going to war is considered to be a just cause, then all--instead of just the military and their families--should be willing to make the necessary sacrifices to fight such a war. This would obviate the need to fund wars like this off budget by creating huge deficits, thereby placing much needed and important federal programs at great jeopardy. This makes more sense than displaying those yellow "Support the Troops" stickers on the bumpers of our cars. What kind of sacrifice does that empty gesture involve?

    Phillip J. Baker

    Kensington, MD

    06/08/2008 @ 7:48pm


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» Act Now!

Coal Country | "This is a civil war."
Peter Rothberg
28 Comments

» The Notion

A Blow to Privatization in Israel (and Perhaps Beyond) | A potentially historic ruling on prison privatization, in Israel.
Eyal Press
16 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

Can China Help on Afghanistan? | Beijing wants a broader role in the Middle East and South Asia. Will Obama bring them in?
Robert Dreyfuss
22 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around the Nation | The week we went Rouge. Plus, Moyers on Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
77 Comments

» The Beat

Health Care Bill Advances, as Harry Reid Trumps Sarah Palin | The death panelist-in-chief rallied her followers to "KILL THE BILL." But 60 senators decided to follow the real leader.
John Nichols
102 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | The "Second Amendment" sale; the raving paranoids of the right.
Eric Alterman