Web Letters: Let the Resurrection Begin

June 7, 2008

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • I don't know what all the fuss and praise is about with regards to Hillary's concession speech. It was not all that good. If that was the best one she delivered, I am more surprised she garnered as many votes as she did.

    Hillary was, and is, a walking, talking cult of personality. That is her strength (among the weak of mind) and weakness (among those demanding truth and accountability).

    Please, no resurrection. Rather, it is time to move on to fresh faces and new approaches. I do hope Obama picks a female running mate, in part to show that it is not the person but the movement that is more important.

    Daniel Carr

    Forest Knolls, CA

    06/09/2008 @ 2:25pm


  • I find it difficult to contrast this article with Hayden's previous analyses of Senator Clinton's campaign conduct. Blaming the men who ill-advised her is a cop-out. If she chose to follow their recommendations, just as she followed the recommendations which created her dishonest vote to give the power to President Bush to invade Iraq, what does this say about her ability to tell the difference between the facts and poor advice? This does not a leader make, and although the concession speech she made was well written and delivered, was it not another attempt to ingratiate herself in order to hold onto power?And can we trust what she said once more? The answer is no, and I don't believe that the only way for Senator Obama to secure the votes of her supporters is to cater to her. Those who recognize the difference between voting for Senator Obama or Senator McCain should make their decisions on their own, and Senator Clinton must not be permitted to receive concession of an important position in Senator Obama's Administration by using her followers as hostages.

    Pearl Volkov

    Sun City Center, FL

    06/09/2008 @ 09:10am


  • Resurrection? Enough with the sanctification of Hillary, already.

    I'd read a few descriptions of the event and speech before I got to Hayden's, and his finished me off. Right back to disgust. Nothing has changed: everything is still all about Hillary getting as much power as she can get. That she could pull off her endorsement as if she meant it no longer surprises me; the woman is a frighteningly skilled actress. Likewise, that the echo-chamber media, across the board, bought it.

    Rehabilitation would have been a better word, but it would have changed none of the above.

    The two web letters about Pollitt's misty-eyed benediction were clear-eyed, and fantastic; how about hiring the writers?

    Novelle Saarinen

    San Francisco, CA

    06/08/2008 @ 5:11pm


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» Act Now!

Coal Country | "This is a civil war."
Peter Rothberg
44 Comments

» The Notion

A Blow to Privatization in Israel (and Perhaps Beyond) | A potentially historic ruling on prison privatization, in Israel.
Eyal Press
19 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

Can China Help on Afghanistan? | Beijing wants a broader role in the Middle East and South Asia. Will Obama bring them in?
Robert Dreyfuss
44 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around the Nation | The week we went Rouge. Plus, Moyers on Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
86 Comments

» The Beat

Health Care Bill Advances, as Harry Reid Trumps Sarah Palin | The death panelist-in-chief rallied her followers to "KILL THE BILL." But 60 senators decided to follow the real leader.
John Nichols
109 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | The "Second Amendment" sale; the raving paranoids of the right.
Eric Alterman