Web Letters: Cautionary Healthcare Tales From California and Massachusetts

By Trudy Lieberman

March 25, 2008

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • A simple bill. All United states citizens shall be afforded health care. 1040 question. Do you wish to have health care added to your deductions pro rated on your adjusted irs reported income?

    ALL WAGE EARNERS AND HEADS OF HOUSEHOLDS SHALL FILE A RETURN TO QUALIFY REGARDLESS OF INCOME?

    IF YES CHECK THIS BOX [] IF NO CHECK THIS BOX []

    Private, for-profit, health does not work. We tried privatizing the military, the jury is still out on private schools, and I shudder to think what a private police force would look like. The present police force is bad enough. I also read that some states want to sell their interstate high ways to Saudi Arabia or the like.

    Question: Why do we pay 140 for a month's supply of pills made in Germany and Germany sells those same pills to a supplier, including shipping, for 18.00 dollars. Research and development, my foot, most R AND D is funded by the governments.

    James Pinette

    Caribou, Maine

    03/28/2008 @ 11:35am


  • The article mentions, then passes without comment, one key issue raised in the healthcare financing debate. It states that annual premiums for a family now average $12,000.

    Personally, with the exception of the costs related to the birth of our children and one accident I had, I have never had healthcare costs that high. Annual physicals for everyone in our family, the occassional visit for allergies, ear aches, or other minor/mid-major illnesses or accidents, never cost near that amount.

    Looking back, if my family had never had health insurance but instead paid everything out of pocket, I'm confident we'd've been better off financially. That is particularly true if we could assume that our employers would have paid us their part of the premiums (which right now work out to be a subsidy of about two-thirds.)

    Obviously, insurance is forward-looking (at least in theory) so we can't completely rely on our past experience to protect agains future costs. A car accident on the way home tonight or the discovery of some cancer or illness could wipe us out if we don't have insurance. But basic preventive care or first aid, the bare minimums of what society should provide to everyone, are generally inexpensive in the US. Before we just accept $12,000 as a figure we need to pay, we need to define what the societal provided minimums should be.

    Keenan Pawley

    Louisville, KY

    03/28/2008 @ 10:12am


  • Until we address fundamentals, no healthcare system put in place will work to be both financially viable and to cover all Americans.

    In the US we have a culture that doesn't want to ration healthcare, so $1 million to prolong someone's life by only one year is OK but $10,000 toward preventative medicine for a poor family with children is not available. We have pharmaceutical companies pushing hugely expensive drugs for profits and private citizens too often unwilling to accept responsibility for their personal health.

    Add to the mix an irrational liability climate, a belief that death is unnatural, an addiction to expensive high-tech over lower-cost complementary medicine, and the end result is what we have now.

    Only when we start addressing step-by-step the issues listed above (among others) will we move toward an effective solution.

    Chris Andre

    San Jose, CA

    03/27/2008 @ 4:44pm


  • Ms. Lieberman's assertions about the funding of France's healthcare system are inaccurate to the best of my knowledge. The system is heavily financed by employers and employees, based on employment revenues, not on all revenues regardless of employment.

    The French system has gone further and further into debt as both the nature of medical care, patients' expectations from it, and doctors' training evolve.

    The recourse to extremely expensive technologically assisted medicine, at the expense of sound clinical training, is a disaster for everyone's pocketbook. Moreover, the general public's assumption that this type of medical care is the ultimate in progress and efficiency only aggravates the problem. Add to that the fact that the insurance industry and the insurance mentality ensure that doctors must prescribe sophisticated and expensive laboratory tests for what are often banal conditions that could be treated otherwise, and you have conditions that will bankrupt any healthcare system, single-payer or not.

    Debra Weston Mervant

    Saint Egreve, France

    03/27/2008 @ 03:01am


  • Healthcare for everyone, paid for by taxes, will not happen anytime soon. It sounds like a good idea until the cost is discussed. The current system or non-system is perhaps even worse except for its cost, postponed and hidden rather than up front. In fact, the only solution to the healthcare problem is to let the sick and indigent die on their own, without any taxpayer help. This sounds cruel, but actually it is in the interest of the vast majority of Americans. Those with serious illnesses cannot economically be helped. They would do themselves and everyone else a favor by dying as quickly as possible.

    The notion that everyone can be made happy in this life and then offered a happy death is utopian. Utopian thought is dangerous and unrealistic. Pray for the sick if you must, but don't pay to prolong their lives.

    The living must go on living, the near dead must die. Nature is red in tooth and claw, as Tennyson lamented over one hundred years ago.

    Norman Ravitch

    Savannah, GA

    03/25/2008 @ 6:40pm


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Beat

House Passes Health Reform, But Without Reproductive Rights | Pelosi secures necessary votes, but only after allowing anti-choice Dems to bar access to abortion in new programs.
John Nichols
189 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around The Nation | Obama, one year on. Plus: Jeremy Scahill takes your questions, and a new video series from The Nation.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
38 Comments

» The Notion

Injustice in Illinois | Prosecutors in Illinois should be more concerned with an innocent man behind bars than journalism students' grades.
Ari Berman
31 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

Obama Fails in Middle East | Clinton delivers the ultimate diss to Abbas.
Robert Dreyfuss
170 Comments

» Act Now!

Equality Across America | This week, young LBGT activists are staging a National Week of Initiative.
Peter Rothberg
16 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Thursday | Dying laptops, recapping the election, the Dow, and the Yankees with the World Series.
Eric Alterman