Web Letters: The Fall of the American Consumer

By Barbara Ehrenreich

March 11, 2008

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • This was published a year ago. I met four professionals today who are unemployed. One just brought his boat home from the marina, he cannot afford the $300 monthly dock fee.

    Americans are unemployed. They are not spending. So how is the world economy coping?

    Delta Jordan

    Melbourne , FL

    10/04/2009 @ 9:10pm


  • Shop!
    Spend!
    Buy!
    Obey!
    Remember there are thousands of production workers in China and call centers in India that depend on you spending money you don't have.

    W.D. Russell

    East Liverpool , Ohio

    03/14/2008 @ 08:57am


  • I am no economist, but shouldn't a strong economy be based on something more than consumer spending?

    Norman Ravitch

    Savannah, GA

    03/11/2008 @ 4:06pm


  • What a beautiful article! When we, in Russia, read about the economic crises in the USA, we think: "What crises, they still have bread to eat". But it's true, if your main occupation is to buy, what to do if you cannot do that anymore. But don't worry, we are taking over your job. Since we've turned capitalist, Russians are learning fast and soon shopping will be our main occupation. Pity that our houses are still so small, not much space to put anything, but also that will change when the Western real estate markets keep crashing.

    Vladimir Chelkov

    Chelyabinsk, Russia

    03/11/2008 @ 3:10pm


  • A good article! The purpose of globalization, open borders, and Free Trade is to drive down wages! However, low wages equals no disposable income to buy products! If no one buys anything, business makes no profits! No well-paying jobs, and no consumer market!

    Western business interest have been salivating over the China market, with its millions of people, for centuries. The problem was and is, that most of those people do not have the income to buy anything. China, India and Indonesia will become great markets when wages rise. However these countries require high tariffs to protect local workers, industries and farmers from being dumped on by low-wage countries. China has the industries, but not the wages to support a local economy.

    In the "Dictionary of Military Terms" by the Joint Chiefs of Staff , one aspect of the word "dispersion" is "the spreading or separating of troops, material, or activities, which are unusually concentrated in limited areas to reduce vulnerability." This concept has obvious economic uses. Relying on one market to support a worldwide economy is stupid! When that market does not have the income to support that market, it is bound to fail. A failure in that market means a global economic failure.

    It is therefore better to have many independent national markets, so that global trade is not dependent on one market and subject to global failure. Similarly, within national markets, concentrating economic power in the hands of a few companies, invites failure when economic elites make bad decisions.

    Decentralized national economies also spread the risk around within nations. It is also rather obvious that these national economies must have an industrial base and the wages to support a consumer-based market. No part of society can be left behind, because we are all dependent on one another for survival. All boats must float on a rising tide of development, or they all sink!

    Pervis J. Casey

    Riverside, CA

    03/11/2008 @ 3:04pm


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» Act Now!

Coal Country | "This is a civil war."
Peter Rothberg
40 Comments

» The Notion

A Blow to Privatization in Israel (and Perhaps Beyond) | A potentially historic ruling on prison privatization, in Israel.
Eyal Press
19 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

Can China Help on Afghanistan? | Beijing wants a broader role in the Middle East and South Asia. Will Obama bring them in?
Robert Dreyfuss
40 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around the Nation | The week we went Rouge. Plus, Moyers on Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
83 Comments

» The Beat

Health Care Bill Advances, as Harry Reid Trumps Sarah Palin | The death panelist-in-chief rallied her followers to "KILL THE BILL." But 60 senators decided to follow the real leader.
John Nichols
105 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | The "Second Amendment" sale; the raving paranoids of the right.
Eric Alterman