Web Letters: Pakistan's Plight

By Tariq Ali

This article appeared in the January 21, 2008 edition of The Nation.

January 3, 2008

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

If you prefer, you may submit a letter to the print edition only.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • George W. Bush is an impatient and vengeful man. When problems confront that do not allow for instantaneous and agreeable solutions, Bush has a habit of "blowing up" the problem. Blowing up the problem means agravating and inflaming the situation so that chaos ensues, giving his majesty carte blanche in molding the future to his own liking. Naomi Klein called it "Over Shock" in Iraq.

    And this is where Baluschistan comes in. Baluschistan is the home of Pakistan's nuclear program, which would have to be "protected" should severe disruptions take place in populous Pakistan. Bush is already moving to "secure" this region. What's not appreciated is that Baluschistan is said to be rich in oil and gas, has border access to Afghanistan and Central Asia beyond and shares a border with Iran. Indeed, several proposals for pipelines through Baluschistan have come and gone, one of which is said to have cost Bhutto her presidency in 1996 when she gave the nod to an Argentinian company, Bridas, over Unocal. It is no coincidence that Hamid Karsai, the current puppet in Afghanistan is a former Unocal executive.

    So if Bush can push the Baluchis into revolt, and there are many grievances and a conveiniently current Independence Front, then he can separate Baluchistan from Pakistan during the current trouble, bypassing the increasingly corrupt and bankrupt country.

    The problem is the whole region would likely erupt and Pakistan's army would fight, but that is of little consequence to short-timer Bush, who would claim a masterstroke at the outset and be long gone when the bloodshed began.

    Michael McKinlay

    Hercules, CA

    01/07/2008 @ 01:28am


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» Act Now!

Coal Country | "This is a civil war."
Peter Rothberg
41 Comments

» The Notion

A Blow to Privatization in Israel (and Perhaps Beyond) | A potentially historic ruling on prison privatization, in Israel.
Eyal Press
19 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

Can China Help on Afghanistan? | Beijing wants a broader role in the Middle East and South Asia. Will Obama bring them in?
Robert Dreyfuss
43 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around the Nation | The week we went Rouge. Plus, Moyers on Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
85 Comments

» The Beat

Health Care Bill Advances, as Harry Reid Trumps Sarah Palin | The death panelist-in-chief rallied her followers to "KILL THE BILL." But 60 senators decided to follow the real leader.
John Nichols
106 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | The "Second Amendment" sale; the raving paranoids of the right.
Eric Alterman