The Nation.



Pakistan's Plight

By Tariq Ali

This article appeared in the January 21, 2008 edition of The Nation.

January 3, 2008

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

If you prefer, you may submit a letter to the print edition only.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • George W. Bush is an impatient and vengeful man. When problems confront that do not allow for instantaneous and agreeable solutions, Bush has a habit of "blowing up" the problem. Blowing up the problem means agravating and inflaming the situation so that chaos ensues, giving his majesty carte blanche in molding the future to his own liking. Naomi Klein called it "Over Shock" in Iraq.

    And this is where Baluschistan comes in. Baluschistan is the home of Pakistan's nuclear program, which would have to be "protected" should severe disruptions take place in populous Pakistan. Bush is already moving to "secure" this region. What's not appreciated is that Baluschistan is said to be rich in oil and gas, has border access to Afghanistan and Central Asia beyond and shares a border with Iran. Indeed, several proposals for pipelines through Baluschistan have come and gone, one of which is said to have cost Bhutto her presidency in 1996 when she gave the nod to an Argentinian company, Bridas, over Unocal. It is no coincidence that Hamid Karsai, the current puppet in Afghanistan is a former Unocal executive.

    So if Bush can push the Baluchis into revolt, and there are many grievances and a conveiniently current Independence Front, then he can separate Baluchistan from Pakistan during the current trouble, bypassing the increasingly corrupt and bankrupt country.

    The problem is the whole region would likely erupt and Pakistan's army would fight, but that is of little consequence to short-timer Bush, who would claim a masterstroke at the outset and be long gone when the bloodshed began.

    Michael McKinlay

    Hercules, CA

    01/07/2008 @ 01:28am


Popular Topics
Most Searched

Issues »

Most Emailed

Issues »

Blogs

» Campaign 08

McCain Campaign Bans Bush Librarian (Video) | The McCain Campaign drops the hammer on a librarian who dared suggest the supposed "maverick" is like Bush.
Ari Melber

» Capitolism

Can't Keep Brian Beutler Down | Beutler talks to Feingold about FISA
Christopher Hayes

» The Beat

What Obama Should Be Saying About FISA | The Democratic candidate for president could have struck a blow for civil liberties and corporate responsibility today.
John Nichols

» The Dreyfuss Report

The Problem with Power | Samantha, that is. Her Zimbabwe solution is a dangerous step on a slippery slope.
Robert Dreyfuss

» Editor's Cut

Iraq Reconstruction Corruption, Part 7 | The Commission on Wartime Contracting should be a critical curb to the systemic waste, fraud and abuse associated with the wartime-support and reconstruction in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel

» The Notion

The Afghan Pipeline You Don't Know About | It was in the planning stages in 2001; now the U.S.-backed Afghan pipeline has returned, but nobody in the mainstream media is writing about it.
Tom Engelhardt

» ActNow!

Of House and Home | Urge Congress to fight back against the subprime swindle.
Peter Rothberg

» Passing Through

Leveraging the Power of Celebrities | With the help of Web 2.0 tools, celebrities can contribute more than just hype to this election cycle.
Michael Connery

» And Another Thing

Preachers and Politics | Secularism looks better and better.
Katha Pollitt