Web Letters: Hoodwinked in Bali on Carbon Credits

By Daphne Wysham

December 12, 2007

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • The wrangling in Bali is unreal, in that the actual problem is not being addressed, I think because it is scary and probably unsolvable. To begin with, this business of trading is fundamentally flawed: all it does is lets people who can afford it (in exchange for cash) to continue to do the same or more of what they are doing. It also exposes the policy of maintaining hegemony by the US in all matters: the US continues to impose its will disregarding the (needs of the) world community, simply because it is too powerful and no one can do anything about it!

    The problem that needs to be tackled is that of ever-increasing, unchecked consumption mostly by the developed countries of the West and Japan, but also by the potentially mammoth emerging economies of China, India, Brazil etc. The political reality, however, is that in addition to the problems of hunger and dire poverty, the standard of living in the countries of the South in general is so low (compared to the developed countries) that the demand for goods and services in these societies cannot be ignored. Therefore, talk of limiting consumption in those societies is unrealistic.

    Furthermore, the force created by expectations for attaining the Western model of lifestyle created by the consumerism-driven globalization ethos makes any attempt to consider controlling/reducing demand futile. Where it makes sense to start considering limiting consumption, from a rational point of view, is in the countries which already consume most of world's resources. But what politician is going to get (or can expect to get) elected by proposing that he or she will reduce consumption of their constituents to save the world when they get elected? Everyone (including Al Gore) seems to hide behind the faith that science/technology will come to rescue us. Science is not religion, and faith does not solve problems that cry for rational thinking. Planting a few more trees and generating few more kilowatts of power from wind mills will help in the margins, but none of the measures on the table now would resolve the fundamental problem. We seem to have hit upon a hard brick wall, and pessimism arising from Bali is not unexpected.

    M. Siddique

    Chevy Chase, Maryland

    12/13/2007 @ 12:02pm


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Beat

House Passes Health Reform, But Without Reproductive Rights | Pelosi secures necessary votes, but only after allowing anti-choice Dems to bar access to abortion in new programs.
John Nichols
187 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around The Nation | Obama, one year on. Plus: Jeremy Scahill takes your questions, and a new video series from The Nation.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
38 Comments

» The Notion

Injustice in Illinois | Prosecutors in Illinois should be more concerned with an innocent man behind bars than journalism students' grades.
Ari Berman
31 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

Obama Fails in Middle East | Clinton delivers the ultimate diss to Abbas.
Robert Dreyfuss
170 Comments

» Act Now!

Equality Across America | This week, young LBGT activists are staging a National Week of Initiative.
Peter Rothberg
16 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Thursday | Dying laptops, recapping the election, the Dow, and the Yankees with the World Series.
Eric Alterman