Web Letters: Triumph of the Wills

By Daniel Brook

This article appeared in the December 3, 2007 edition of The Nation.

November 15, 2007

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

If you prefer, you may submit a letter to the print edition only.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • One word lacking from Daniel Brook's review is "Lamarckian," as in "the inheritance of acquired characteristics." Although that wasn't the only idea Lamarck contributed to the debate about natural selection/evolution, it's the one we all associate with him, because it was wrong.

    "Patience, delayed gratification, the ability to work hard, ingenuity, innovativeness, and education": these are all acquired during one's lifetime and are not transmissible to one's offspring. Clark's thesis sounds ludicrous.

    Carol V. Hamilton

    Pittsburgh, PA

    11/21/2007 @ 06:47am


  • Did this chap ever read the works of Thomas Hardy? I am thinking of Tess of the d'Ubervilles, "Justice was done, and the President of the Immortals, in Æschylean phrase, had ended his sport with Tess." Indeed, Wessex, en masse, seems to have escaped the "Joy through Work" ethos adumbrated here.

    John Clarke

    Baltimore, MD

    11/19/2007 @ 12:03pm


  • It's traditional for genetically dead-end aunts and uncles to tease their nieces and nephews; the teasing from the dead-enders builds character and strengthens society. I bet Mr. Brook can do blackface too.

    W.D. Wagner

    St. Francisville, LA

    11/16/2007 @ 11:22am


  • I loved this article. I laughed at the statement that "Clark does not even attempt to address the paradox of Spain, which, though it never developed a Protestant work ethic--workers there have national nap time every afternoon--remains wealthier than every one of its former colonies." I easily agree with the author that Spain lacks the work ethic of Anglo-Saxon countries ; I am not that sure, however, if real hard working is more difficult to be found over here. But what is just incorrect is to say that workers here have national nap time every afternoon.

    Some workers here (sure, more here than in Anglo-Saxon countries) go home for lunch, a custom that has to do with strong family ties (sure, stronger here than in Anglo-Saxon countries). But only people who do not need to work, such as the very affluent or retired, can afford an afternoon nap. Most workers, both blue-collar and white-collar, cannot afford to go home for lunch. Note that most of them work in big cities (Madrid, Barcelona...) and spend a long time commuting. And, believe me, we do not have "nap-rooms" at work!

    Julio Perez
    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, Asturias, Spain

    11/16/2007 @ 08:31am


  • How good of American academics to write about little old England! However, please can they be accurate? The article states: "Clark's argument hinges on extensive archival research on the wills of medieval Englishmen. Over the course of twenty years of research in dusty archives, Clark compiled data from more than 2,000 wills. He chose a time period (1585-1638)..." A good time to choose, but this is not "medieval." The medieval period is normally said to have ended about 1500, though some historians date it at 1492 because of a voyage of a certain fellow from Genoa to some obscure part of the globe.

    The article also refers to the Catholic ban in England on reading the Bible. No source is given for this because there is none. It is a myth. However, over here in little old England quite a difference was made by the invention of printing, which a chap called Caxton introduced into England. It's quite taken on now and a lot of us read rather more the Bible, among other things.

    Eric Hester

    Bolton, England

    11/16/2007 @ 03:23am


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» Act Now!

Coal Country | "This is a civil war."
Peter Rothberg
46 Comments

» The Notion

A Blow to Privatization in Israel (and Perhaps Beyond) | A potentially historic ruling on prison privatization, in Israel.
Eyal Press
20 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

Can China Help on Afghanistan? | Beijing wants a broader role in the Middle East and South Asia. Will Obama bring them in?
Robert Dreyfuss
44 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around the Nation | The week we went Rouge. Plus, Moyers on Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
88 Comments

» The Beat

Health Care Bill Advances, as Harry Reid Trumps Sarah Palin | The death panelist-in-chief rallied her followers to "KILL THE BILL." But 60 senators decided to follow the real leader.
John Nichols
109 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | The "Second Amendment" sale; the raving paranoids of the right.
Eric Alterman