Web Letters: Our Man in Pakistan

truthdig

By Robert Scheer

November 7, 2007

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • The situation in Pakistan is far more unstable and volatile than has been portrayed. The US/Musharraf/Bhutto deal that allowed her return was a capitulation by Musharraf that indicated that his political situation was quickly eroding. Why else would he agree to this arrangement, unless he had concluded that sharing power was preferrable to losing it altogether?

    This arrangement to share power with Bhutto was intended to avoid declaring martial law and the unrest it would cause. My guess is that Musharraf discovered a potential coup d'état by a section of the military and moved to squash it. Otherwise, it seems that the plan for elections and shared power with Bhutto would have been allowed to proceed. The consequences of political schisms within Pakistan's military and secret service have a potential to reach a level of chaos that could quickly become uncontrollable. The scenarios are scary.

    As to the US/Musharraf/Bhutto deal, what a combination to offer the Pakistani people. If the political situation was destablizing under Musharraf, this arrangement was sure to raise the bar. The high regard that the Western media holds for Bhutto is not shared by over 70 percent of Pakistanis, who see her as the embodiment of aristocratic arrogance and corruption.

    Ultimately, the instability in Pakistan is the result of Musharraf's association with Bush and the American war on Islam. Thinking that a US-brokered deal to unite Bhutto and Musharraf would somehow pacify this unrest is a stunning miscalculation.

    Keith Chudzik

    Columbus, OH

    11/08/2007 @ 12:57pm


  • Talk about unforeseen consequences! There are no good options in Pakistan, and they have real nuclear weapons. While Bush may be cool toward the idea of cutting off aid, Senator Leahy, whose committee controls the aid, may push for cuts if the emergency situation continues.

    I think we have to be leery of a US-backed regime change, but if it occurs naturally by moderate elements in society, we would naturally have to work with any new government. This is a can of worms!

    Pervis J. Casey

    Riverside, CA

    11/07/2007 @ 1:34pm


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» Act Now!

Coal Country | "This is a civil war."
Peter Rothberg
Posted at 10:52 ET

» The Notion

A Blow to Privatization in Israel (and Perhaps Beyond) | A potentially historic ruling on prison privatization, in Israel.
Eyal Press
8 Comments
Posted at 9:48 ET

» The Dreyfuss Report

Can China Help on Afghanistan? | Beijing wants a broader role in the Middle East and South Asia. Will Obama bring them in?
Robert Dreyfuss
8 Comments
Posted at 8:50 ET

» Editor's Cut

Around the Nation | The week we went Rouge. Plus, Moyers on Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
60 Comments

» The Beat

Health Care Bill Advances, as Harry Reid Trumps Sarah Palin | The death panelist-in-chief rallied her followers to "KILL THE BILL." But 60 senators decided to follow the real leader.
John Nichols
73 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | The "Second Amendment" sale; the raving paranoids of the right.
Eric Alterman