Web Letters: The Protect Alberto Gonzales Act of 2007

diary of a mad law professor

By Patricia J. Williams

This article appeared in the August 27, 2007 edition of The Nation.

August 9, 2007

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

If you prefer, you may submit a letter to the print edition only.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • Here's an idea that may or may not put a monkey wrench in their Orwellian plans (don't know enough about IT to say for sure): How about a national campaign involving millions of people who start using flagged words and phrases in every e-mail and conversation they can--tens of millions of phone calls, text messages and e-mails daily for the software to sort through, so much that if it doesn't crash the system, it might at least make the human intelligence process too time-consuming and therefore worthless?

    Steve McGaughey

    Champaign, IL

    08/13/2007 @ 1:33pm


  • When fear is used as the exclusive rationale for policies that exceed our own principles of democracy, then we experience an erosion of what we were founded upon and passionately believe in--freedom. There is no justification for circumventing checks and balances and judicial oversight. Passively like sheep and attention diverted with other worries, we all watch with confusion as such deeply important issues become laws without the analysis they deserve and explanation that we deserve.

    Rochelle Cisneros

    Cocoa Beach, FL

    08/12/2007 @ 09:44am


  • President Bush claimed that the terrorists hate our freedom, our democracy, our rights and our liberty.

    As a devoted anti-terrorist Administration, the White House is committed to reducing the risk of the terrorist attacks by shrinking our freedom, our democracy, our rights and our liberty.

    The less of it we have, the less hateful the terrorists are and the less exposed we are.

    It is indeed a brilliant strategy. And they say that Mr. Bush is not willing to compromise.

    The President doesn’t like it either, but he is doing it to protect us.

    Kenan Porobic

    Charlotte, NC

    08/10/2007 @ 10:49am


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» Act Now!

Coal Country | "This is a civil war."
Peter Rothberg
Posted at 10:52 ET

» The Notion

A Blow to Privatization in Israel (and Perhaps Beyond) | A potentially historic ruling on prison privatization, in Israel.
Eyal Press
8 Comments
Posted at 9:48 ET

» The Dreyfuss Report

Can China Help on Afghanistan? | Beijing wants a broader role in the Middle East and South Asia. Will Obama bring them in?
Robert Dreyfuss
8 Comments
Posted at 8:50 ET

» Editor's Cut

Around the Nation | The week we went Rouge. Plus, Moyers on Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
60 Comments

» The Beat

Health Care Bill Advances, as Harry Reid Trumps Sarah Palin | The death panelist-in-chief rallied her followers to "KILL THE BILL." But 60 senators decided to follow the real leader.
John Nichols
72 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | The "Second Amendment" sale; the raving paranoids of the right.
Eric Alterman