Web Letters: It's Easier to Insure Pets Than Kids

By Barbara Ehrenreich

July 26, 2007

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • Ms. Ehrenreich: Great article! Your description of a political system and insurance industry that provide healthcare insurance for our pets, while many of our children go lacking for medical care, illustrates the great hypocrisy of our capitalistic society. The current American healthcare system seems to be just another "bait and switch" (I'm reading your book) flimflam that the politicians and the insurance industry have perpetrated on America's middle and working class and poor. I look forward to the day when we will have a healthcare system that will provide medical coverage for all Americans.

    Conversely, I can't see how profit-oriented businesses can provide good healthcare insurance. It is difficult to imagine the profit motive being compatible with providing healthcare--there appears to be a vast and insurmountable hurdle that divides the two concepts.

    The incompatibility of the health insurance industry's profit motive with the provisioning of healthcare was even understood by President Richard Nixon. Michael Moore's movie Sicko points out that Nixon was a big supporter of the development of health maintenance organizations--the healthcare profit machines that are the bane of good medical care.

    John Scott

    Cave Creek, AZ

    07/27/2007 @ 8:05pm


  • Are we not paying ten billion dollars a month for the "pre-emptive" invasion in Iraq? I think the program is $80 billion for five years! Where is the shame from not only this Administration but Congress, MSN and the people?

    Eileen Harris

    Kensington, MD

    07/26/2007 @ 8:12pm


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» Act Now!

Coal Country | "This is a civil war."
Peter Rothberg
44 Comments

» The Notion

A Blow to Privatization in Israel (and Perhaps Beyond) | A potentially historic ruling on prison privatization, in Israel.
Eyal Press
19 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

Can China Help on Afghanistan? | Beijing wants a broader role in the Middle East and South Asia. Will Obama bring them in?
Robert Dreyfuss
44 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around the Nation | The week we went Rouge. Plus, Moyers on Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
85 Comments

» The Beat

Health Care Bill Advances, as Harry Reid Trumps Sarah Palin | The death panelist-in-chief rallied her followers to "KILL THE BILL." But 60 senators decided to follow the real leader.
John Nichols
109 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | The "Second Amendment" sale; the raving paranoids of the right.
Eric Alterman