The Nation.



It's Easier to Insure Pets Than Kids

By Barbara Ehrenreich

July 26, 2007

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

If you prefer, you may submit a letter to the print edition only.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • Ms. Ehrenreich: Great article! Your description of a political system and insurance industry that provide healthcare insurance for our pets, while many of our children go lacking for medical care, illustrates the great hypocrisy of our capitalistic society. The current American healthcare system seems to be just another "bait and switch" (I'm reading your book) flimflam that the politicians and the insurance industry have perpetrated on America's middle and working class and poor. I look forward to the day when we will have a healthcare system that will provide medical coverage for all Americans.

    Conversely, I can't see how profit-oriented businesses can provide good healthcare insurance. It is difficult to imagine the profit motive being compatible with providing healthcare--there appears to be a vast and insurmountable hurdle that divides the two concepts.

    The incompatibility of the health insurance industry's profit motive with the provisioning of healthcare was even understood by President Richard Nixon. Michael Moore's movie Sicko points out that Nixon was a big supporter of the development of health maintenance organizations--the healthcare profit machines that are the bane of good medical care.

    John Scott

    Cave Creek, AZ

    07/27/2007 @ 8:05pm


  • Are we not paying ten billion dollars a month for the "pre-emptive" invasion in Iraq? I think the program is $80 billion for five years! Where is the shame from not only this Administration but Congress, MSN and the people?

    Eileen Harris

    Kensington, MD

    07/26/2007 @ 8:12pm


Popular Topics
Most Searched

Issues »

Most Emailed

Issues »

Blogs

» The Beat

Obama's Wrong Turn in Afghanistan | Instead of talking about sending more troops, he should listen to wise critics of the occupation.
John Nichols

» Campaign 08

Al Gore Makes Surprise Visit to Netroots Nation | The former VP parachutes into the netroots summit, seeking support for the climate movement.
Ari Melber

» The Notion

Netroots Summit Grapples with Bipartisan Attacks on Rule of Law | The netroots clash with liberal experts & Obama advisers over how to restore the rule of law after Bush.
Ari Melber

» Capitolism

Crawford | A new documentary takes a look at what happened to the town George W Bush decided to call home.
Christopher Hayes

» ActNow!

Honoring the Next Generation | Cristina Lara wins first Brave Nation Young Activist Award. Watch the video.
Peter Rothberg

» The Dreyfuss Report

Spies Cash In | Spending for spooks has doubled since 9/11.
Robert Dreyfuss

» And Another Thing

McCain Opposes Contraception -- Pass It On | He's for Viagra and against the pill. Why won't the media cover this important story?
Katha Pollitt

» Editor's Cut

NOLA Watch: Gulf Stream Fails the Smell Test | Fifteen thousand displaced people living in trailers are still are in need of permanent, safe homes.
Katrina vanden Heuvel

» Passing Through

The Web Will Not Kill Traditional Organizing | The internet is not the end of local community organizing, just a new tool that allows citizens to more efficiently build their social capital.
Michael Connery