The Nation.



A War Not Worth Fighting

truthdig

By Robert Scheer

July 25, 2007

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

If you prefer, you may submit a letter to the print edition only.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • Regarding the 11.6 million tons of equipment currently used by our troops in Iraq (as stated in Newsweek), if we need it to fight against Al Qaeda, the less trained Iraqi troops need it even more to be successful in the same fight. Any training needed for a proper usage of this equipment could be provided by a very limited number of US advisors or by bringing the Iraqis to the USA for skill drills. Instead of spending an additional $300 billion dollars waging the Iraq War for an additional three years, we could leave that equipment to the Iraqis, which would give them an upper hand in dealing with the insurgency. If we did that, nobody could say we betrayed and abandoned the Iraqis. Government support by a majority of the population, heavily armed, would have no chance of losing this war.

    At the same time, we would be able to withdraw our troops within six months and buy completely new, improved equipment with the money we would save by not waging the Iraq War anymore.

    But this plan would make sense only if the real intentions of the White House in Iraq matched its publicly proclaimed goals. This move would actually make the Iraqi government self-sufficient!

    Kenan Porobic

    Charlotte, NC

    07/27/2007 @ 3:47pm


  • Newsweek's analysis on Iraq reflects the necessity to return 11.6 million tons of critical equipment. Based on the withdrawals from Viet Nam, Kosovo, etc., they calculate that under peaceful conditions, it would take over five years. It is delusionally unrealistic not to take that important factor into account. The presidential candidates (both D&R) are probably smart enough to know this, but just don't want to say so.

    John D. Froelich

    Upper Darby, PA

    07/27/2007 @ 12:48am


  • There is a limit to rationality before it crosses over into irrationality,

    Neither George Bush, nor Congress, realizes that our future has long since crossed over and into the world of irrationality. And it had started before the invasion into Iraq. That blunder only highlights our step into stupidity.

    Forget about the initial cause of our "war on terror," 9/11. That was only a gateway for the inmates to plan a reaction. Instead, measure the worth of our leaders by what followed.

    And what followed was a plan fashioned in the world of irrationality. At which point all that was around turned into insanity. Yes, insanity. And that is the real reason for the continuing deaths of our soldiers and innocent civilians.

    So, for the sake of one man's (and his henchmen's) irrational steps, we are all taking part in his irrational policy for further destabilization. It's the Big Bully with his Gang of neoconservative Republican robots, along with the spineless Democrats who are afraid to even suggest the idea of impeachment, that are responsible for this insanity. Unfortunately, this is the moral fiber of our current regime.

    Yet being as we are, perhaps that is what we deserve, for we too have lost our spirit of Truth. Until we understand how to find and use our rational thought, all of us in this country will continue to be responsible for its demise.

    Bohdan Yuri

    Kennebunkport, ME

    07/25/2007 @ 9:30pm


  • For all the people willing to use the WWII analogy in comprehending how to proceed in Iraq, it might be helpful to consider whether we are playing the role of the Nazis in this conflict. We are the occupying force in Iraq disliked by the locals. We could use the WWII analogy only if we were helping the Iraqis to kick out a hypothetical occupying force, let’s say Russia, Iran or Israel.

    Kenan Porobic

    Charlotte, NC

    07/25/2007 @ 2:22pm


Popular Topics
Most Searched

Issues »

Most Emailed

Issues »

Blogs

» Campaign 08

McCain Campaign Bans Bush Librarian (Video) | The McCain Campaign drops the hammer on a librarian who dared suggest the supposed "maverick" is like Bush.
Ari Melber

» Capitolism

Can't Keep Brian Beutler Down | Beutler talks to Feingold about FISA
Christopher Hayes

» The Beat

What Obama Should Be Saying About FISA | The Democratic candidate for president could have struck a blow for civil liberties and corporate responsibility today.
John Nichols

» The Dreyfuss Report

The Problem with Power | Samantha, that is. Her Zimbabwe solution is a dangerous step on a slippery slope.
Robert Dreyfuss

» Editor's Cut

Iraq Reconstruction Corruption, Part 7 | The Commission on Wartime Contracting should be a critical curb to the systemic waste, fraud and abuse associated with the wartime-support and reconstruction in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel

» The Notion

The Afghan Pipeline You Don't Know About | It was in the planning stages in 2001; now the U.S.-backed Afghan pipeline has returned, but nobody in the mainstream media is writing about it.
Tom Engelhardt

» ActNow!

Of House and Home | Urge Congress to fight back against the subprime swindle.
Peter Rothberg

» Passing Through

Leveraging the Power of Celebrities | With the help of Web 2.0 tools, celebrities can contribute more than just hype to this election cycle.
Michael Connery

» And Another Thing

Preachers and Politics | Secularism looks better and better.
Katha Pollitt