Web Letters: Tenet's Treachery

truthdig

By Robert Scheer

May 2, 2007

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • In spite of all the attention Tenet's book is getting I can't imagine that it's going to sell. I don't know anything about publishing, but I think his book would have been a bigger hit if he had informed us at the time that we should have not gone to war with Iraq. I would rather read a book about one of our leaders actually doing something heroic for a change, but thats just me. I should know better than to expect something like that.

    This book will go a long way to antagonize and anger its readers and confirm our lack of trust in the government. Not exactly a selling point for the book. Hey George, hindsight is always 20/20 but what you've managed to do is insult our intelligence as well.

    Somewhere, I think there is a publisher cleaning out his desk because he gave a $4 million advance to a guy who wants to make money off of his cowardice.

    Tom Pisano

    Shirley, NY

    05/02/2007 @ 4:17pm


  • The three sentences of Tenet is a recurrent theme in this tragic event that is the war on Iraq. Clark, O’Neal, and now Tenet have said the same thing: Bush and the cabal that accompanied him to power came prepared to attack and occupy Iraq. What is missing is the answer to the question, why? During his 60 Minutes interview he was asked what Tenet thought was the reason for this war, and he refused to answer that question. Is it not astounding that no one can figure out why this war?

    Journalists and commentators have failed to launch a thorough investigation of the people who were/are the ideologues and architects of this war, to examine their past, their ideologies, their allegiances, their personal and professional motives, etc., in which one ought to find the answer to the question, why? In particular, if they indeed came prepared to eliminate Saddam and occupy Iraq, and all they needed once they came to power was to find excuses such as threat of WMD, mushroom-cloud, Al-Queda link, etc., how is it possible that they did not have an a-priori reason for their plan?

    Hegemony in the post cold-war world, Israel, oil, vendetta against Saddam, combination of some of these or others? Is it not one of the most important issue to understand and reveal to the public why this war? Without understanding the reasons behind it, how can public policy be understood, modified and mistakes not repeated?

    M. Siddique

    Chevy Chase, Maryland

    05/02/2007 @ 1:59pm


  • It didn't matter if Tenet spoke up about the lies prelude to the Iraq invasion. Bush was going to invade despite anyone's opinion.

    In his press conference he made the goof,"We're going to get Saddam,,uhh Osama.." That tells me the whole incident of 911 was about Saddam. Osama was the hit man.

    Paul Wiggins

    Virginia Beach, VA

    05/02/2007 @ 12:50pm


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» Act Now!

Coal Country | "This is a civil war."
Peter Rothberg
40 Comments

» The Notion

A Blow to Privatization in Israel (and Perhaps Beyond) | A potentially historic ruling on prison privatization, in Israel.
Eyal Press
19 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

Can China Help on Afghanistan? | Beijing wants a broader role in the Middle East and South Asia. Will Obama bring them in?
Robert Dreyfuss
40 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around the Nation | The week we went Rouge. Plus, Moyers on Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
83 Comments

» The Beat

Health Care Bill Advances, as Harry Reid Trumps Sarah Palin | The death panelist-in-chief rallied her followers to "KILL THE BILL." But 60 senators decided to follow the real leader.
John Nichols
105 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | The "Second Amendment" sale; the raving paranoids of the right.
Eric Alterman