Web Letters: A Cruel and Unusual Punishment

By Billy Sothern

April 24, 2007

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • Billy Sothern is worth a hundred Barack Obamas. (Sorry, I forgot that progressives are supposed to look the other way when Obama "talks white.")

    James J. Matthews

    Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    06/29/2008 @ 12:40am


  • So your argument that it is a waste of money to seek justice for a child from a repeat child rapist? That Louisiana, in spite of its hardships, would stick to this cause is most noble and should be congratulated--but those that refuse to see that death is a due punishment for some crimes could never understand.

    Cruel and unusual? No. The cruelty was in the crime, and the unusual is that fact that in spite of its depravity we still treat this person with the dignity of a trial and feed and clothe him and protect his "rights" under law. There is nothing cruel about justice and punishment for crimes. Some things deserve death. I disagree with the Justice's writ. The rapist does kill. It kills the hope and dreams and pursuit of happiness that the person raped had before their horror. It takes their life and leaves them with a damaged one... Life goes on but not the life they had. Their life will not "recover" from this. The scar is permanent. The death penalty is due justice.

    CM Wilson

    Atlanta, GA

    05/23/2007 @ 1:34pm


  • Is the death penalty a cruel and unusual punishment for a child rapist/pedophile, and an apparent repeat offender? I don't think so. Unless you are arguing against applying the death penalty in all instances, the author's point that it shouldn't be applied in this instance because no murder occurred is ludicrous. This crime murders a child's childhood and robs their self-worth. Granted, our current judicial system shapes criminal penalties based on race and wealth, especially the death penalty. But, as long as there is a death penalty, and child rape is a crime in which perpetrators always repeat if given the opportunity, the sentence could apply. The minimum would be a life sentence.

    Would the author have accepted a plea of self-defense if the victim had had the ability and opportunity to act herself?

    Rick Trachsel

    Gainesville, Florida

    04/26/2007 @ 1:16pm


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Notion

A Blow to Privatization in Israel (and Perhaps Beyond) | A potentially historic ruling on prison privatization, in Israel.
Eyal Press
Posted 21 minutes ago

» The Dreyfuss Report

Can China Help on Afghanistan? | Beijing wants a broader role in the Middle East and South Asia. Will Obama bring them in?
Robert Dreyfuss
Posted at 8:50 ET

» Editor's Cut

Around the Nation | The week we went Rouge. Plus, Moyers on Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
53 Comments

» The Beat

Health Care Bill Advances, as Harry Reid Trumps Sarah Palin | The death panelist-in-chief rallied her followers to "KILL THE BILL." But 60 senators decided to follow the real leader.
John Nichols
64 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | The "Second Amendment" sale; the raving paranoids of the right.
Eric Alterman

» Act Now!

Toward Copenhagen | A guide to joining the movement against climate change.
Peter Rothberg
77 Comments