Web Letters: For America's Sake

By Bill Moyers

This article appeared in the January 22, 2007 edition of The Nation.

January 5, 2007

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

If you prefer, you may submit a letter to the print edition only.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • This was an interesting speach, and I'm sure it was powerful to hear in person. It is illustrative of the inner Bill Moyers. It makes very clear where his beliefs are founded. I do not disagree with many or most of the moral and social points that are made. But the pursuit of such goals should be limited to pursuasion and debate. Morality should not be dictated by law.

    I am enclosing some of my thoughts as I read the speach.

    "...on orders from Wall Street." Who is Wall Street? Wall Street is us; it's you and me and everyone. Stock ownership is widespread and common and every person who owns a stock expects it to perform. So this would be more fairly put, "On our orders."

    "...searching for dignity and fairness against long odds in a cruel market world." This says a lot about where Bill is coming from. The "market world" isn't cruel any more than the natural world is cruel. Both are impartial. Wouldn't it sound silly to personify a volcano or earthquake by calling them cruel, as though they are conscious? This is a very big topic, and one that defines the core of a liberal's belief system. It ultimately rests on the complete mistrust, misunderstanding and contempt of "the market."

    "...so that democracy no longer has the ability to hold capitalism accountable for the good of the whole." Is this what democracy is intended to do? Is this what capitalism is intended to do? Neither of these terms use each other in their definitions. The share the term "free."

    Jon Caldwell

    Raleigh, NC

    02/19/2007 @ 12:55pm


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Beat

House Passes Health Reform, But Without Reproductive Rights | Pelosi secures necessary votes, but only after allowing anti-choice Dems to bar access to abortion in new programs.
John Nichols
135 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around The Nation | Obama, one year on. Plus: Jeremy Scahill takes your questions, and a new video series from The Nation.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
8 Comments

» The Notion

Injustice in Illinois | Prosecutors in Illinois should be more concerned with an innocent man behind bars than journalism students' grades.
Ari Berman
28 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

Obama Fails in Middle East | Clinton delivers the ultimate diss to Abbas.
Robert Dreyfuss
137 Comments

» Act Now!

Equality Across America | This week, young LBGT activists are staging a National Week of Initiative.
Peter Rothberg
16 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Thursday | Dying laptops, recapping the election, the Dow, and the Yankees with the World Series.
Eric Alterman