The Nation.


  • The Intemperate Candidate

    Victoria,

    As an outside observer on this debate, I have to say that an article like this is extremely distressing. One of the key foundations of a working democracy has to be a respect for truth and reason and a rejection of simple minded dogmatism.

    Mrs. Clinton was asked what her response would be to an attack by an enemy nation against a very close ally. Her response was actually the correct one, a strongly worded threat. She just parroted what has been US foreign policy on this issue since 1979.

    In fact, she clearly said "could obliterate" not "would," and that actually just makes it a statement of fact. The United States could obliterate any county it felt like, you guys have several times the nuclear arsenal of the entire rest of the world combined.

    What was she supposed to say, that after Tel-Aviv is in ruins she would open negotiations with Tehran? That they would douse the country in candy corn and stuffed pandas? How ridiculous--the Iranians would attack Israel the minute her hand hit the Bible.

    There was no mention of genocide at all, or the use of nuclear weapons in her comment. This is all the conjecture of the author.

    Deja Frenette
    04/23/2008 @ 8:51pm


  • Why Hillary Makes My Wife Scream

    Yellow Springs, Ohio

    It takes an individual a lot of work to labor under the illusion that Senator Obama represents a "transformational" form of politics. His is a candidacy that purports to represent "change" without actually delivering on the specifics of what that "change" might entail. Some of his economic advisors are fans of the deregulator Milton Friedman, his foreign policy advisors are hawkish, center-right policy wonks and he has many friends in storied firms on Wall Street. This, my friends, is not "transformational"; it is more of the same, packaged in a shiny, new wrapper. Real change in America would require the transformation of our society from a more laissez-faire, market force, multinational, consumer economy to a mixed-economy of tighter government regulation, strong public utilities and schools and policies seeking to end the erosion of the middle class. Surely, this is not the sort of "transformation" that Senator Obama has in mind. This sort of change would entail many sacrifices across the political and economic spectrum. This sort of change would not sell so well in these days of media monopoly and sound bite candidacies. No, his is a much safer, media driven apparatus, designed to flatter and appeal. It worked wonderfully in February, but now that the klieg lights are on him, he doesn't seem so special after all.

    Bains Muller
    04/23/2008 @ 8:15pm


  • The Liberation of Reverend Wright

    Philadelphia, Pa.

    It is so incredibly easy for someone who has no experience with a thing to assume the worst of it, to read the worst into it, to refuse to examine it with an open mind, and to tell people to "get over it."

    I assure you that if you overheard the worst thirty seconds of an all-female support group for victims of rape, you'd think those women were militant lesbian man-haters. And then, when I told you that it was a support group for victims of rape, you'd say, "Oh. Well, I can understand that, then. No wonder they're so angry."

    I assure you that if you overheard the worst thirty seconds of a support group for Veterans who have no health benefits and no social support, you'd think those folks were rabid anti-American commie-lovers. And then, when I told you that it was a support group for war Vets who were abandoned by the country they protected with their very lives, you'd say, "Oh. Well, I can understand that, then. No wonder they're so angry."

    But when it comes to blacks, there is no sympathy. And why should there be? The general consensus seems to be that racism no longer exists, and that blacks are just paranoid or using racism as an excuse. That blacks want to be enabled. That blacks blame the entire world for their problems.

    Meanwhile, you have me, a black female who has worked hard for every penny she's earned. Who has spent her entire life imagining that she was above and beyond racial prejudices, has a white boyfriend, a mixed daughter, and was considered an "oreo" by family and community both.

    You have someone like me--a black female who was convinced that racism did not exist, and resented her own race for clinging to the ghosts of racism in a world where it no longer exists.

    You have me, who went camping in a rural part of Pennsylvania with her daughter within the last couple of years and, while picking up supplies at a convenience store, was called a 'black whore' by four white boys driving by--a woman who, by the way, dresses more modestly than most, and was not behaving nor dressed at all whorishly.

    You have me, a black woman who was frozen on the street as she overheard a white man at an outside lunch table saying loudly, "Barack Obama is a tar-baby. He's a fucking tar-baby!” And who was brought nearly to tears by the fact that the other white people at nearby tables were the ones who shouted the man down, who told him to have a little respect. And who then had to figure out how to best walk away from the whole thing with dignity, because even though I was warmed that they’d defended me, there is a certain of humiliation that is difficult to explain. Maybe it’s the fact that everyone immediately looked at me, which immediately linked me to the incident, and somehow made it feel far more personal than it actually was.

    You have me, a lingua-loving black woman who was outraged at the fact that a school-teacher can be fired for teaching her students how to use the word, but has come across websites devoted entirely to discussing how the country would be much better off without blacks, using such language as "niggers," "coons" and "apes." I honestly did not believe that people still said these things who weren’t specifically in the KKK (and to be honest, I thought the KKK was, by and large, dying off. I am still of the belief--the hope, rather--that it exists only in the South, far far away from where it can affect me and my family.)

    I fully admit it--I have been one naïve idiot.

    The first boy I kissed was a white boy named Donald. I'll never forget it. I was 6, and I was teased and criticized by family and neighbors alike for it, and I couldn’t understand why. I mean, I was a kid, but I did understand that I was supposedly to hold our differences in skin color against him. I just didn’t want to. I declared that I would be “color-blind," and when my enthusiasm seemed to draw a strange sort of sadness from my mother, I just chalked it up in my head that she was intolerant and unenlightened.

    I truly believed that the world outside of where I lived--near druggies, gangs, food stamps, and bars that opened up in the morning and filled soon after with jobless blacks--was as color-blind as I’d decided to be. I can remember with clarity how strongly I felt and how strongly I believed. I had to believe. Because believing otherwise would be to believe that my life was destined to be one of welfare, trash-strewn streets, crack-addicts who were so stupid they’d break into your house, put your television in their living-room, and invite you over for dinner. You may have heard that one as a joke that someone like Chris Rock tells. Meanwhile, I knew it as something that happened to someone who lived down the street from me.

    But it was at a much more mature age that I realized that racism still exists. It exists less for a woman like me, who lives in a liberal city, and who has been blessed to know people of every race who try very hard to be beyond color, and are comfortable enough to crack jokes about the stereotypes, or discuss racial and cultural differences with a thoughtfulness that has always left me feeling like there is hope for this country.

    But there is something wrong when a woman like me--a woman who has devoted her life to transcending the strictures of race--can't go to a rock concert without receiving stares that range from curious to inexplicably angry. Something wrong when I am asked, “Why are you even here?” by a girl who, along with her friends, seemed to have decided that I shouldn’t be at the concert--much less in the front row--even though like every other good little rock fan, I arrived early and waited in line.

    There is something wrong when a black female who is highly educated, polite, socially conscious, and--well--nice, can still experience hateful speech based on the color of her skin. Has to endure a cab ride where the taxi-driver apologizes ahead of time for being suspicious, but he's realized he “can't trust blacks” when they say they're just going to "run inside for a moment and will be right back" and so requests that I pay in full, even though I need a round trip. A part of me logically felt like I couldn’t hold it against him. A part of me curled up in misery that I was being told by a perfect stranger that he didn’t trust me to behave honestly because I was black. And what’s worse is that I could react in outrage--which would make me seem overly sensitive or something--or I could swallow my pride, accept the insult, and try to be “understanding.” Either way, I am left feeling like something you’d find stuck to the underside of a desk.

    Since this campaign began, I have witnessed words and thoughts that have driven home that no matter how nice I am, no matter how much I give to charity, no matter how hard I try to be a good mother, no matter how hard I strive to be better than the culture into which I was born--no matter what, there will be people who first and foremost will see me as black. They will make assumptions about me, many of them not good. They will be suspicious, even if they apologize for it ahead of time.

    And I’ve realized that many of you don’t give a damn. That’s okay. You don’t have to. It’s so easy to discount the pain of others if you haven’t experienced it yourself, so easy to say "get over it" or "suck it up." It’s so easy to say life isn’t fair, to concern yourself with your own problems, to chalk these words up to whining. I’ll fully admit that I’m not above whining, and my boyfriend--and my therapist--can verify that!

    It’s okay if you personally don't give a damn, but I do. This is my life. And I am so tired of being told, "You know, you sound white when you talk on the phone!" by people who expect me to be pleased by it, who obviously mean it as a compliment, but don't realize the insult at the very heart of such a statement. What do I even say to that? “Oh, uh, heh heh, heh, well, yeah, people tell me that all the time.” What can I say, without coming off as being “paranoid” or “playing the race card”?

    I am so tired of people who compliment my mixed daughter by saying, “She is so lucky she got her father’s hair.” How is that even right to say? What can I even say to that when, by this point, I’m starting to believe the same thing?

    I have spent most of my life disenchanted with my own race, doing everything I could to distance myself from everything that seemed "too black" to me. I became a goth. I drove down urban streets blasting Bush--the band, not the President--and Red Hot Chili Peppers. I straightened my hair and dyed it colors and did everything I could think of to assert to the world--look! I am not Like The Other Blacks. And being intelligent, I realize that to some of my friends, this did in fact make me far more palatable.

    But I’ve grown up. And it’s finally been driven home.

    I'm black. I've never felt so black as I have lately. And while you'd imagine that I'd be overjoyed at finally reconciling the many many personal issues I have about who I am, where I come from, and the color of my skin, I am not. I have white friends who can trace their heritage all the way back to another country--one friend who claims, and quite possibly is, related to an English monarch.

    But uh, what do I have to be proud of? Where have I come from? If I tried really hard, I’d probably be able to trace my heritage back to someone who couldn’t sit at the front of a bus and were expected upon pain of possible death to not make eye contact with whites. Between me and you, I’d rather have the English monarch as an ancestor.

    I'm not a crier, but I have cried more about this lately than I ever have. I haven’t gone camping since that day, years ago. And I find myself looking at white strangers and wondering if, when they look at me, they assume that I am poor. If, when I wear my hair in braids or some other typical black style, they assume that when I open my mouth, I’ll speak in Ebonics.

    Maybe I am a little paranoid now. Maybe when I walked up to the counter at a grocery store today, and two white men who were discussing Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama went silent with such comedic obviousness that even the store clerk--a white male--rolled his eyes, maybe I just imagined that. Maybe I am somehow trying to “enable myself”--to do what, I have no idea, as I am already successful, educated and middle class (at great odds, I am learning.)

    Or maybe I am faced with the unfortunate reality that no only do I have to deal with a lingering stigma of being female--being weaker, being more sensitive, being more gullible--I also have to deal with a lingering stigma of being black.

    And you know, I think if a self-professed "oreo" has experienced that kind of thing, then those blacks who have long since embraced their culture getting it even worse. I hear too many things that I used to doubt and that I used to chalk up as exaggeration, and I see the truth in them now. Even worse, I see too many people dismissing these things as mere paranoia. Okay. Now I’ve experienced it, and I am being told that it never happened? That shows me that Something Is Wrong.

    When even Condoleeza Rice (so graciously dubbed "Congo-leeza" on several sites I have visited) speaks about the horrible and, yes, terrifying instances of racism that she and her family have endured, I know that Something Is Wrong. That woman is more mainstream white-bread “oreo” than me, and her family was well-off in a way that’s hard to mistake as ‘typical ghetto trash.’

    I am the atheist child of a Jehovah's Witness, who has always scorned the loud, prophetic preachers of your typical black church. I never really got why they seemed to hold on to this concept that I thought was outdated, or why they were so loud. My father died when I was a child, and I was so terrified by the Baptist ceremony I witnessed that I haven't been to a funeral since. I have held no love for that style of preaching (or religion in general, for that matter, but that is another story).

    But within the past few weeks, I have come to understand. I have come to appreciate that the hurt I have experienced can be considered nothing when compared to what some many if not most blacks experience on a day-to-day basis. Decent blacks, hard-working blacks, blacks who haven't been enabled since they took their first steps as children. Blacks who are still being judged by the color of their skin, who are still being told in subtle ways that being black is something to be ashamed of, something to try to avoid somehow, something to try to "offset" by adapting more mannerisms that tend to be considered "white." Blacks who haven’t had the opportunities I’ve had, fortunately opportunities that have led directly to the success I have made of myself today.

    And what I have realized is that those thirty seconds of Rev. Wright's speech--a man that I can't pretend to understand, leading a church that I have shunned my entire life--are like thirty seconds from a support group for people whose entire lives, each and every day are defined by something they can't change, and shouldn't have to change. For people whose entire lives consist of generation after generation of the same self-destructive behaviors, being passed down from mother to daughter and father to son, like a disease--behaviors which have come to define an entire race.

    Lately, I have found myself clinging to white friends--so I can remember and continue to believe that despite the actions of a few jerks and assholes, this country really has come this far. I feel an inexplicable relief and joy when some random white stranger interacts with me in a manner that reaffirms my belief that not all whites are racist, and that not all whites are looking at me and seeing something negative. I have heard and read about whites who--after Barack Obama’s speech on race--wondered if their black friends were all secretly two-faced. I am floored that we can have such similar emotions, and still be completely unwilling to give each other the benefit of the doubt.

    But I also find myself glancing back to where I came from, and the people and the culture I left behind, and realizing how unfair I've been, and how I have been deluding myself. I half feel like I owe the black community an apology. Like I should call my mother up today and apologize to her for the scorn I felt for her, not at all considering the fact that she was alive when blacks weren’t allowed to drink at the same water fountain as whites, when they were treated as if they all had some kind of disease, when they were treated like a pile of fresh crap that someone had just stepped in.

    I think instead I'll just try standing up for Trinity Church--for the black church--for blacks in general, for a change. I think I'll try being a little less ashamed of who I am and where I came from, for a change. I think that when I hear people talk about that church, I am going to defend it with every breath I have, because I finally get it. These people need church, and they need a church that speaks to them not in the quiet, polite way that many churches have, but in the way their lives actually are.

    They need to believe that God will not only vindicate them, but that He--being a good god--can’t possibly love people who treat them poorly so well as he loves them, because that’d just be damned unfair. I am not religious, and my “black card” got revoked a long time ago, but I finally get it, and I can’t stand idly by while people demonize the existence of a church that exists to provide community, mental, and emotional support for people who spend every day of their lives being told in subtle and not so subtle ways that they aren’t fit to live. I have only felt this, on and off, within the past couple of years, and it has affected me in ways that I think no one who hasn’t experienced it will ever actually understand.

    But I won’t stop believing in that this country can get better, that people can step outside of their comfort zones and face reality, and that people can embrace and acknowledge people and cultures that seem foreign and perhaps even scary to them.

    I won’t stop believing that one day, things will be so sweet that we can ALL “get over it," because I’d really just love it if I could walk down the street with my white boyfriend and not catch grief from whites and blacks alike. I’d really just love it if my mixed daughter could attend just one school, somewhere, where there isn’t some jackass kid calling her a “white girl” as an insult, a “black girl” as an insult, or a “Chinese girl” as an insult (her dad was Japanese). I think things are bad for me, and then I realize that my daughter is going to be catching it from every angle. Fortunately for her, she’s gorgeous, and society seems to value that in a way that transcends race.

    But I realize we are not going to get there, if no one is willing to talk across the races and realize that everyone’s angry and frustrated and that their reasons for being so are just as valid as anyone else’s. As long as there are white people who dismissively tell blacks to “get over it," and as long as there are black people who refuse to even try to “get past it," we won’t be getting anywhere at all.

    Misty S. Boyer
    04/23/2008 @ 7:50pm


  • Why Hillary Makes My Wife Scream

    Boone, N.C.

    Thank you, Tom! I was feeling so lonely here in the mountains. Couldn't hear your wife (even though I also spend alot of time in the silence). Couldn't hear anyone but Hillary on radio and cable TV plying her spurious wares.

    Sent an e-mail question for Ken Rudin on NPR today, but they didn't air it. I'll print it here in the hope that it will somehow get into the conversation (anyone is invited to please appropriate it):

    It seems that the day or so before each primary, Hillary goes "negative" is some way. I won't list them here. However, it seems that there are two kinds of "negative": a kind that is true, and a kind that is not true. Don't you think it would be helpful if news reports would distinguish between these two kinds of negative?

    Lynda Connor
    04/23/2008 @ 5:31pm


  • Why Hillary Makes My Wife Scream

    Rye, N.Y.

    Mr. Hayden's argument might carry more weight with me if he let his wife speak for herself.

    Of course, if I was married to Tom Hayden I might scream too.

    Charmian Neary
    04/23/2008 @ 5:29pm


  • Why Hillary Makes My Wife Scream

    Brooklyn, N.Y.

    "To use the current terminology, Hillary people are bitter people, even more bitter than the white working-class voters Barack has talked about. Because they circle the wagons so tightly, they don't recognize how identical, self-reinforcing and out-of-touch they are." Read a blog, any blog, where there is any article on the race, and you will get a million Obama supporters spewing all sorts of vitriol about Clinton and her supporters and repeating every Obama talking point without the slightest hint of anything new, insightful, or open-minded (well, there are of course exceptions, but you see the point). And yet in the quote above you call Hillary supporters bitter, self-reinforcing, and out of touch. If you replaced Hillary with Obama, I would pretty much agree with you.

    After all, the premise of your article is that your progressive, pacifist wife loses her mind at the mere sight/sound of Hillary. That kind of runs contrary to your implication that Obamaists have marshaled some spiritual centeredness, while bitter Clintonists shut out all the other voices in their echo-chamber delusion box (can your wife hear what Hillary says when she's screaming at the TV?).

    I'm a Hillary supporter, and I'm far from crazy about Obama, but both sides' supporters need to lighten up, and now. If Obama supporters think calling Hillary supporters every name in the book every chance they get is smart, then, well, they're wrong. You'll need their support if you win, which many of you think you already have.

    Daniel Avery
    04/23/2008 @ 4:27pm


  • Why Hillary Makes My Wife Scream

    Buffalo, N.Y.

    Whoa, who is listening to all of us screamers? I banned her name from my household since before Monica. My husband was bemused by my "irrational" dislike (see, I still have trouble writing her name), especially since it was such an intense feeling, I couldn't fully explain it. Many of us rooted in the '60s (Tom, you are a bit older) moved more to the right when we started to pay taxes, some of us even voted Republican. Yet, I am finding a new delight in Obama, an excitement I can feel and share with my 31-year-old son. We are rooted in the concept of fairness and inclusiveness. We aren't naïve and know that lying and politicians aren't mutually exclusive. The thing that really gets me screaming at the TV is when I know that she really, really assumes I'm too stupid to know when someone is lying to me. Me, with my MD degree. Right now in my office is one of many of my severely disabled patients from one of the local group homes. A patient who isn't welcome in many of my "colleagues's" waiting rooms. Why do I think That Woman would hesitate hugging this person. Well, guess what? I know a fraud when I see one.

    Regards to your wife,

    Sharon Kuritzky
    04/23/2008 @ 3:16pm


  • Why Hillary Makes My Wife Scream

    Levittown, N.Y.

    To Corrine Marasco, who wrote: "Tom Hayden says that because his wife doesn't like Hillary Clinton, he thinks Hillary should quit the race. I had no idea that elitism is now a progressive principle": Did you make it past the title of the piece? He went into detail about why he believes that Hillary staying in the race is hurting the Democratic Party.

    "Mrs. Hayden may be inspired by Obama's undefined 'transformational appeal,' but she should be reminded that with all his advantages, Obama still hasn't pulled a game-ending upset. What does that say for his chances in November if the Haydens get their wish and he is the nominee?" His entire campaign is an upset. The fact that Obama survived Super Tuesday is amazing in and of itself. This constant moving of the goalposts by Clinton supporters is getting very tiresome. After Iowa, it was a "contest for delegates." After Obama took the delegate lead, Hillary blew through a series of "firewalls" that would supposedly put her back on track for the nomination. Now that she is essentially mathematically eliminated, if Obama doesn't "upset" or "overtake" her, it "raises questions" about his candidacy.

    The only question left is how much damage will be done to Obama before Clinton finally sees the writing on the wall. Her current strategy is to drive up his negatives as high as possible, which hopefully won't be enough to torpedo his campaign against McCain. McCain is loving the fact that Hillary Clinton is doing his job for him.

    Howard Johnson
    04/23/2008 @ 2:49pm


  • Why Hillary Makes My Wife Scream

    Ft Lauderdale , Fla.

    You described me to a "T." I could just scream right now! I too am a peaceful health nut and Hillary is making me nuts to the point of being angry with myself for allowing her to do that!! How she fooled all those poor PA voters (my parents were from PA, but much smarter!) into thinking she gives a crap about them is beyond me. The other issue is the margin being reported that she won PA by 10 percent. According to the Pennsylvania Secretary of State's website the number is 9.2, a single-digit win not a double[digit win--small difference, but very important! Why is that not being reported in the mainstream media? The accurate figure should be reported to the American public!I was a Republican for forty years and am now backing Barack Obama (same for my husband) as I am sick and tired of the politics of the past. I will not have a good nights sleep until Hillary is out of this race!Let your wife know I feel her pain!

    Tricia Edwards
    04/23/2008 @ 2:31pm


  • Why Hillary Makes My Wife Scream

    Palo Alto, Calif.

    Tom, I'm sorry but you are so "yesterday." Your article reminds me of Stokeley Carmichael (or was it Huey Newton?) famously saying that, "Sure, there's a position for women in the Black Power movement: prone." The progressive youthified left has never been comfortable with women of power ('60s anthems like "American Woman, Stay Away from Me," "Under my Thumb" and "Stairway to Heaven" come to mind).

    Yes, I did read the article and yes, I did see your obligatory nods to feminism (understanding why Hillary would have to be extra strong on defense etc.) but you betray your true leanings with phrases like "nails on a blackboard" (more than one male pundit has used similar terms to describe how incredibly... well, annoying Hillary is) and by attributing this belief to your wife (thinking, like CNN with Candy Crowley, that if you can get anti-female opinion to come from the mouth of a woman, then you skate free of all charges of sexism).

    Tom, the '60s are over. It is time for a new generation of leadership. It's time for Change Women Can Believe In. It's time, above all, to move away from that uniquely "progressive" form of disingenuousness that sugar-coats deep misogyny for easy consumption by the liberal left.

    Heather Collins
    04/23/2008 @ 2:21pm


  • The Intemperate Candidate

    Decatur, Ga.

    Scheer writes: "It is bizarre that a politician who bought into the phony threat about Iraq's nonexistent WMD arsenal now plays political games with the alleged threat posed by Iran."

    It's only bizarre if you're assuming that Senator Clinton was "duped" into believing that Iraq had WMDs. On the contrary, there was plenty of evidence at the time to suggest that Iraq didn't pose a direct threat. That's why a small minority in Congress--among them Obama--voted against the authorization. Some in Washington may well have believed the Bush Administration's lies about WMDs, but I'm convinced that Sen. Clinton, who's nothing if not smart, voted for the resolution purely out of political calculation.

    Her new threat to obliterate Iran, coming as it does after the widely publicized intelligence estimate refuting the Bush Administration's claims of an Iranian weapons program, also reeks of political calculation rather than sincere belief. The problem is that her political ambition and her deep-rooted, even obsessive, desire to appear "tough" could well get us into yet another war if she is elected President. We can't afford another leader like that.

    James Steffen
    04/23/2008 @ 2:10pm


  • Why Hillary Makes My Wife Scream

    Alexandria, Va.

    Tom Hayden says that because his wife doesn't like Hillary Clinton, he thinks Hillary should quit the race. I had no idea that elitism is now a progressive principle.

    Hayden's wife can scream all she likes, but there are progressives who believe in doing their talking at the ballot box. In Pennsylvania yesterday, 2.3 million voters spoke. Not only did the Haydens not like what they heard, apparently they don't care about the people and what the people think.

    While the Haydens indulge themselves in a tantrum over Hillary's alleged "path of destruction," they have obviously missed Barack Obama's impressive record of invoking Republican talking points against Hillary. For someone who has decried "petty, trivial, slash-and-burn, tit-for-tat politics," it's obvious he prefers using those techniques himself.

    Mrs. Hayden may be inspired by Obama's undefined "transformational appeal," but she should be reminded that with all his advantages, Obama still hasn't pulled a game-ending upset. What does that say for his chances in November if the Haydens get their wish and he is the nominee?

    Corinne Marasco
    04/23/2008 @ 10:49am


  • Did Race Win the Race for Hillary?

    Savannah, Ga.

    Obama's appearance on the scene gives us a welcome chance to talk about race, really to talk. Of course mixed communities have more racial grievances. What do you think I felt like when some black teenagers knocked me off my bike just because I, a white man, was riding through their neighborhood? What do you think I thought when my parents, certainly not racist, moved from a changing neighborhood to one that was obviously going to be all white or at least white and rich Asian? It is easy to be tolerant and non-racist when you do not live with racial conflict.

    Obama's candidacy has given us a chance to dream about a race-less America. It has also forced to recognize how naïve we have been. We in the so-called "elite" probably needed this wake-up call.

    Norman Ravitch
    04/23/2008 @ 10:46am


  • The Intemperate Candidate

    Los Angeles,

    Hillary, in hindsight, can be against the war in Iraq but can say she would obliterate Iran if it were to wage a nuclear attack against Israel. Is this the same judgment she used for her earlier support of the Iraq war? Will her response to the 3 am phone call be "Obliterate 'em"? And how was this not talked about by mainstream American media? How is her statement acceptable and Obama's "bitter" statement not? I will not vote for Hillary if she is the last candidate on earth.

    Miguel Sanchez
    04/23/2008 @ 10:36am


  • Why Hillary Makes My Wife Scream

    Indianapolis, Ind.

    You've hit it on the head.

    We are a nation divided. Forty percent of Pennsylvanians said they would not vote for Senator Obama if he were to win the nomination. Forty percent carry that same, vindictive spirit that Hillary has.

    The Clintons have done more to destroy the Democratic Party and alienate the black vote than they ever did to build it.

    They tapped into the very fear of White America. A black man having oversight over them. Hillary can have her PA victory. She won it. But my respect, she can never win now.

    The chasm is dividing, and it's just sad.

    Helen Akins
    04/23/2008 @ 10:32am


Popular Topics
Most Searched

Issues »

Most Emailed

Issues »

Blogs

» Passing Through

Voter Intimidation in Missouri | I hope the voters of Missouri find pride in their Constitution, and keep its protections intact.
Zephyr Teachout

» J Street

Collapse of the Middle Class | How the economy has grown and left Americans behind.
Te-Ping Chen

» The Beat

John McCain: Eco Warrior | The Republican candidate engages in some serious election-year greenwashing.
John Nichols

» ActNow!

This Brave Nation | Take a sneak peek at a new documentary series highlighting conversations between progressive heros.
Peter Rothberg

» The Notion

Running Out of History | If climate change takes us beyond anything recorded in history, who are we?
Tom Engelhardt

» Editor's Cut

Invasions of Privacy | Burger King's spying on a non-violent organizing coalition may be illegal and must be held accountable.
Katrina vanden Heuvel

» Campaign 08

Of Course, Edwards Voted for Obama | The former candidate voted for "him," not "her."
John Nichols

» And Another Thing

Preachers and Politics | Secularism looks better and better.
Katha Pollitt