: George W. Bush took an electoral beating November 24, but not at any ballot box in this hemisphere. Bush’s pounding was administered in Australia, where his closest international ally, Prime Minister

John Howard

, suffered a stinging rebuke. Not only did Howard’s Liberal Party lose control of the upper and lower chambers of the Australian Parliament but the prime minister failed to retain the parliamentary seat he’s held since 1974. That’s a big loss for the White House, because no global leader so slavishly parroted Bush as did Howard. The Bush Administration did everything it could–short of invasion–to influence the voting there. The President traveled to Australia to hail Howard’s commitment to the neoconservative agenda, especially the dispatch of Australian troops to Iraq and the support of US moves to help India develop its nuclear capacity. When Howard faced domestic pressure over the detention of Australian citizens at Guantánamo,

Dick Cheney

arranged for their release.

But it wasn’t enough. The opposition Labour Party prevailed, placing mildly socialist technocrat

Kevin Rudd

in the prime ministership. Rudd’s pledge to bring Australian troops home from Iraq–further dismantling the “coalition of the willing,” which had already been diminished by electoral revolts in Spain, Italy and other countries–grabbed international headlines. But Australia’s contribution to the occupation is a modest 550 combat troops. The bigger shift will come on climate change, where Rudd promised to align himself with the agenda of Nobel laureate

Al Gore

. Abandoning the rejectionist line that made Howard the top world leader standing with Bush against the Kyoto Protocol, Rudd and his party’s environmental spokesman–former Midnight Oil rocker

Peter Garrett–

promised to sign the agreement as a first order of business. The new prime minister will travel to Bali in early December to help world leaders strengthen the protocol. “The atmosphere at [the] Kyoto talks in Bali will be markedly different due to this election result,” explained Greenpeace International political director

Shane Rattenbury

. “The US Administration will no longer be able to plot with the Australians in its effort to destroy international progress against climate change.” Greenpeace says Bush is more “isolated” than ever on the global warming front, and the loss of Howard spells a broader isolation. Australians used to call their prime minister “Bush’s poodle.” Without Howard, the President is left with only White House terrier


. The lesson Democrats should take from the land down under is that a commitment to fighting climate change is not just another talking point. It’s a potent issue that separates the politicians of the past from those of the future.    JOHN NICHOLS


: According to a recent report by the University of San Francisco School of Law, at least 2,381 US prisoners are serving life sentences without parole for crimes committed when they were younger than 18. The United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world (750 prisoners per 100,000 people) and leads–by staggering margins–in the number of juvenile offenders sentenced to die in prison, accounting for 99.9 percent of all such cases worldwide. The study also noted that African-American children are ten times more likely than white children to be sentenced to life without parole.


: The Nation lost one of its oldest and most cherished friends when

Alfred Knobler

died November 21 at 92. A leader in the American glass industry, Alf was an enthusiastic member of The Nation‘s first ownership group, assembled by Ham Fish and Victor Navasky in the mid-1970s. With his son Peter, he presided over Crawdaddy magazine; and when that sprightly enterprise fell on hard times, he arranged for the then-homeless Nation to inherit the lease for the Fifth Avenue premises that would be the magazine’s home for two decades. In the ’90s he joined the Circle of 100 Partnership, the latest incarnation of the limited partnerships that have sustained The Nation off and on since 1977. And in 2003 Alf graced us with a lasting legacy, providing $1 million to The Nation Institute to endow the

Knobler Fellowship

, which is awarded annually to an outstanding minority journalist. Alfred Knobler was a generous ally, a sharp and iconoclastic observer of the American scene and a fixture at Nation seminars and public events. We mourn his passing and extend our sympathies to his family.


: While The Nation did not break the news that the Clinton campaign had planted a question at an Iowa event, subsequently hyped as Plantgate or Questiongate, we’d like to think we played a small role not in its sensationalism but in its sturdier journalistic roots. The story was first reported by former Nation Institute intern

Patrick Caldwell

. Reflecting on the brouhaha, he writes, “On November 6,

Hillary Clinton

appeared at a biodiesel plant in Newton, Iowa, part of a weeklong blitz on her new energy plan. The small venue was packed with locals and a sizable press contingent. I was covering the event for the Grinnell College paper, Scarlet and Black. I had planned to write about the senator’s uninspired entrance music–the Police’s ‘Every Little Thing She Does Is Magic’–but I unexpectedly ran into a classmate,

Muriel Gallo-Chasanoff

, who said the Clinton people had approached her looking for a college student to ask a specific question about global warming.

“As soon as my story was published online, major media outlets began calling me for confirmation, and before long CNN, the AP and countless blogs swarmed. Clinton’s rivals, looking for openings, insisted they would never plant a question at a public event. Clinton had been criticized for her debate performance at the end of October, and during the following weeks her campaign hit a few bumps. My story became one more bit of ammunition fired at the front-runner, a little gust in the swirling tornado of allegation that defines the way we elect our Presidents. The voracious campaign press, competing daily for new material, whips small stories like mine into twenty-four-hour firestorms. A week later, the details fade into obscurity, replaced by some new blowup, all of them distractions for voters trying to understand the issues and decide for themselves who our next President should be.”