Quantcast

Justice in Guatemala | The Nation

Justice in Guatemala

  • Share
  • |
  • |
  • StumbleUpon.com
  • |
  • Recommended by 0
  • |
  • Text Size A | A | A

What does a fair trial look like in a country with no justice? Guatemala found out on October 3, when three judges concluded a month of hearings by finding Col. Juan Valencia Osorio guilty of planning and ordering the 1990 assassination of anthropologist Myrna Mack Chang. The verdict set a precedent: A senior Guatemalan military officer was convicted as the intellectual author of a human rights crime. And--another first--declassified US government records were used as legal evidence against Washington's former allies.

Kate Doyle served as an expert witness in the Mack trial. The documents used in the trial and dozens of other declassified US records on US policy in Guatemala may be found at the website of the National Security Archive.

About the Author

Kate Doyle
Kate Doyle is a senior analyst and director of the Mexico Project and the Guatemala Documentation Project for the...

Also by the Author

Mexico's first freedom of information initiative, signed into law by
President Vicente Fox on June 10, represents a growing popular challenge
to governments throughout Latin America to end corruption and guarantee
openness and accountability. It also contrasts with attempts by the Bush
Administration to hinder public access to government information.

In addition to the new law, Fox recently opened up a lode of secret
police, military and intelligence documents from the early 1950s through
the mid-1980s. They promise to shed light on the long and dirty war the
government fought against its left-wing opponents, of whom more than 500
are thought to have been disappeared, tortured and killed by the state.
Mexico's new openness is especially significant because it arose from
public pressure rather than being imposed from on high. The catalyst
behind the freedom of information bill was a campaign by a collective of
reporters, editors, academics and nongovernmental organizations dubbed
the Grupo Oaxaca, for the Mexican city where eighteen months ago they
kicked off their drive. Once members of Congress indicated they were
prepared to introduce a bill last fall, the group drafted and submitted
one, getting it to legislators more than two months before Fox's
government came up with its own proposal.

That kind of citizen lobbying is rare in Latin America, but it appears
to be catching on. In Peru a consortium of media owners, the Peruvian
Press Council, has rallied to the cause, taking the unprecedented step
of holding discussions with the armed forces in an effort to preclude
military opposition while hammering out national security exemptions
that will permit the greatest openness possible on such sensitive issues
as human rights. In Paraguay news organizations and NGOs are preparing
to present an initiative before their Congress, and Guatemalans have
been pressing for several years for the right to request personal files
from a government notorious for intelligence operations targeting
citizens.

Now that the bill has been passed, Mexico faces its real battle:
convincing the public to use it. In a country where a powerful executive
branch has historically overshadowed a weak Congress, a dysfunctional
judicial system and a malleable press, citizens are not used to
demanding and receiving their rights. Supporters of the Fox government's
new openness say it will give them the leverage they need to expose
painful episodes of the recent past, like the state's role in the dirty
war of the 1970s and '80s, when the military abducted and disappeared
hundreds of guerrillas and suspected subversives. An even more pressing
mystery is the October 2, 1968, killing by Mexican security forces of
hundreds of students protesting for democratic reform in Mexico City's
Tlatelolco.

The Tlatelolco massacre offers the most acute example of the Mexican
government's obsession with secrecy. Hours after the confrontation
between demonstrators and soldiers, then-President Diaz Ordaz had the
plaza scrubbed and cleaned to efface all signs of the indiscriminate
firing. Soldiers descended on the city's newsrooms and confiscated
undeveloped rolls of film, so that no image of the violence would
survive. Many questions remain as to who ordered the massacre, and who
began the shooting.

But the real test for Mexico's new law will be much more mundane. This
is a country where citizens have no access to the most fundamental
government information affecting their daily life. Local school budgets,
crime statistics, antipollution controls, the salaries of public
officials, the number of police patrols, the contracts awarded by the
state and much more are out of reach for ordinary citizens. The same
civil society groups that organized and fought for their right to basic
information must now mobilize to educate people on how to use the law in
their favor.

Ironically, Mexico's incipient efforts toward greater transparency come
as the Bush Administration moves resolutely in the opposite direction.
The freedom of information law in Mexico--indeed, the effort to
challenge government secrecy and corruption throughout Latin America--is
perceived by citizens as an indispensable tool for exercising their
rights in the hemisphere's new democracies. Perhaps the oldest democracy
in the region could learn a thing or two from its neighbor.

Myrna Mack documented the fate of indigenous communities on the run from the army's brutal counterinsurgency operations. Her work infuriated government and military officials. On September 11, 1990, army intelligence specialist Noel de Jesús Beteta stabbed her twenty-seven times as she left her office in downtown Guatemala City. She was left to die on the sidewalk.

Twelve years later, the trial of the men accused of planning the killing took place in a crowded courtroom in the capital, just blocks from the street where Myrna was murdered. Hundreds of spectators filled the folding chairs. Military families sat elbow to elbow with the country's leading human rights activists--including Myrna's sister, Helen Mack. Helen's success in winning a conviction against Beteta in 1993 and her subsequent fight to bring his superiors to justice has made her a national champion.

Opposite Helen and her legal team sat the defendants--Gen. Edgar Godoy Gaitán, chief of the presidential staff in 1990; Valencia Osorio, head of Godoy's clandestine intelligence unit, the Archivo; and Col. Juan Oliva Carrera, Valencia's second-in-command and Beteta's immediate superior. Six lawyers representing the officers jostled one another at a rickety table covered with papers, cell phones and laptops.

Simply to be in the courtroom was to make history. From the day Myrna was killed, Helen Mack and her allies have been relentlessly pressured by surveillance, harassment, death threats, physical attacks and murder. In 1991 the government's chief homicide investigator was assassinated in Guatemala City. Key witnesses were silenced or forced to seek refuge outside the country. Judge Henry Monroy, who in 1999 ordered the trial to proceed against the three officers, resigned from the judiciary and fled Guatemala because of threats on his life. Even as the trial was under way, Mack's lead lawyer, Roberto Romero, sent his wife and three children out of the country after a series of frightening incidents, including a drive-by shooting at their house.

Government stonewalling and a dysfunctional justice system also jeopardized the case. The defendants delayed the trial for years with dozens of frivolous appeals. The government refused to provide Mack's lawyers with records necessary for their investigation, including basic information on the structure of the armed forces and biographical data on the three officers.

Faced with a conspiracy of silence, Helen Mack wove a web of circumstantial evidence. A newspaper vendor--whose testimony in 1992 helped convict Beteta--came out of hiding in Canada to describe the sophisticated surveillance he witnessed against Myrna's home: the cars with darkened windows, the men with walkie-talkies. Civilian military experts explained how a national security doctrine imparted by the United States inculcated Guatemala's army with an ideology strong enough to justify any means necessary to crush the left.

And US documents--released under the Freedom of Information Act from the secret archives of the CIA, the Pentagon and the State Department--identified the Mack assassination as a government-planned hit and described the army intelligence units behind it. In one cable sent by the US Embassy shortly after Myrna's murder, then-Ambassador Thomas Stroock portrayed a government policy of "selective violence" and provided chilling detail on how the killings were covered up. "The sort of hit discussed here is carried out or directed by individuals who are members of the security forces, often military intelligence," wrote Stroock. While the attacks were decided and organized at a "senior level...'Death squad' personnel might often not appear on the official rosters of the security services and do not report for duty to official installations; they wait at home for orders, usually via the phone, or at times are picked up without prior notice to perform a job. They operate in cells so it is difficult to trace the orders up the hierarchy."

These documents exist because of the intimate relationship between the United States and Guatemala from the start of the civil war in 1962 until it ended with the signing of peace accords in 1996. Despite US knowledge of the army's role in nearly 200,000 civilian deaths, military and economic aid and covert intelligence support flowed almost uninterrupted for thirty years. All three of the officers accused of planning Mack's assassination received training in US military schools.

The court accepted Helen's argument that the crime was institutional, but singled out Valencia based on a taped interview with Beteta that identified him as the intellectual author. By convicting Valencia alone, the judges disappointed the prosecution but made an appeal by the colonel that much harder to win.

The courage of Helen Mack, her lawyers and the judges is cause for celebration in Guatemala and around the world, where efforts to prosecute the killers, kidnappers and torturers who once ruled so many nations continue. The Bush Administration has sought to politicize and obstruct the very idea of transnational justice. But this is what international justice is all about: putting murderers in jail. And the United States can play a crucial supporting role, wittingly or not.

  • Share
  • |
  • |
  • StumbleUpon.com
  • |
  • Recommended by 0
  • |
  • Text Size A | A | A

If you like this article, consider making a donation.

Reprint this article. Click here for rights and information.